110 likes | 228 Vues
This report by Luke Sibieta, published by the Institute for Fiscal Studies, examines recent poverty trends under the Labour government, comparing them to previous years, particularly during the Thatcher era. The report highlights a significant decrease in pensioner poverty while revealing that non-pensioners, especially working-age non-parents, have seen little improvement. It analyzes poverty definitions and metrics, noting that while overall poverty rates have fallen since the late 1990s, certain groups remain at risk. The report urges deeper understanding of income disparities and poverty dynamics.
E N D
Recent Trends in Poverty Luke Sibieta Institute for Fiscal Studies 13th March 2006
Headlines • Falling levels of relative poverty under Labour • Compared to sharp rise under Thatcher • Rapid falls in pensioner poverty • Non-pensioners now more likely to be in poverty AHC than pensioners • No fall in working-age non-parent poverty • No fall in proportion of individuals with incomes below 40% of the median
Defining Poverty • Relative notion of poverty • Number of individuals in households below 60% of the BHC and AHC median • Income-based • Headcount: no account of depth • Snapshot: no account of length • No account of needs or public perceptions
Why has pensioner poverty fallen? • More recent cohorts of pensioners less likely to be in poverty than earlier cohorts • Poverty falls as more recent cohorts make up a larger proportion of the pensioner population • Falling poverty rates within cohorts • Which effect is bigger?
Why has pensioner poverty fallen? • Pensioner poverty AHC has fallen by 11 percentage points since 1996/97 • 8.3 percentage points from reduced risk of poverty within cohorts • 2.7 percentage points due to increased proportion from more recent cohorts
Summing up • A quarter of the population were in poverty AHC in 1996/97, now it is just under a fifth • Pensioner poverty AHC has fallen from 2.8 million in 1996/97 to 1.8 million in 2004/05 • No falls in poverty amongst working-age non parents, who make up 39% of the population • Little change in the proportion of individuals with incomes below about 40% of the median