1 / 19

“Years wrinkle the skin, but to give up enthusiasm wrinkles the soul.” – Douglas MacArthur

Thought for the Day. “Years wrinkle the skin, but to give up enthusiasm wrinkles the soul.” – Douglas MacArthur. Reminder. Test tomorrow 21 April 7:45am Geology C11 (i.e. here!) Covering: Up to section 8.2, p. 149. Dominant term. Big-O Notation. Or order notation.

lee-winters
Télécharger la présentation

“Years wrinkle the skin, but to give up enthusiasm wrinkles the soul.” – Douglas MacArthur

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Thought for the Day “Years wrinkle the skin, but to give up enthusiasm wrinkles the soul.”– Douglas MacArthur

  2. Reminder • Test tomorrow • 21 April • 7:45am • Geology C11 (i.e. here!) • Covering: • Up to section 8.2, p. 149

  3. Dominant term Big-O Notation • Or order notation • Assume we can find a function giving the number of operations: Order n2 or more simply: O(n2) f(n) = 3.5n2 + 120n + 45

  4. Order Notation • Formal Definition We say that an algorithm is O(f(n)), or that the algorithm is of the order of f(n), if there exist positive constants c and n0 such that the time t required to execute the algorithm is determined by: tcf(n) for all n > n0

  5. Ranking of Common Functions • 1 - Constant Complexity • Unlikely • log n- Logarithmic Complexity • Very good • n- Linear Complexity • Directly related to n • nlog n • Quite common, not bad

  6. Ranking (cont.) • n2- Quadratic Complexity • Getting impractical for large n • nm- Polynomial Complexity • Hierarchy of their own • 2n- Exponential Complexity • Useless except for very small n • n! - Factorial Complexity • Even worse! (e.g. Cramer’s Rule)

  7. A Perspective • Assume computers get 1 000 000 times faster/more powerful • i.e. ± 30 years from now! • How much bigger can we make the dataset? • O(n): 1 000 000 times • O(n2): 1 000 times • O(2n): + 20

  8. Be Aware • Order notation loses information • O(n2) might really be 0.0005n2 + 3000n – 6 • If the constants have extreme values and n is small we may be better off with a simpler, less efficient algorithm

  9. Simple Examples • Very few O(1) algorithms • single sequence of statements, no loops or recursion for (int k = 0; k < 10; k++) // do something • Also O(1) • no dependence on input data

  10. Simple Examples (cont.) for (int k = 0; k < DATA_LENGTH; k++) // do something to the k'th data element • O(n) for (int k = 0; k < DATA_LENGTH; k++) for (int j = 0; j < DATA_LENGTH; j++) // do something to the k'th element and // the j'th element • O(n2)

  11. Simple Examples (cont.) • O(n) • Data is simply arranged in a matrix for (int r = 0; r < NUMBER_OF_ROWS; r++) for (int c = 0; c < NUMBER_OF_COLS; c++) // do something to the (r,c)'th element

  12. Simple Examples (cont.) for (int k = 0; k < DATA_LENGTH; k++) for (int j = 0; j < (DATA_LENGTH-k); j++) // do something to the k'th element and // the j'th element • First time around the outer loop: n iterations • Second time: n-1 • Third time: n-2 • ... • Last time: 1

  13. Example for (int k = 0; k < DATA_LENGTH; k++) for (int j = 0; j < (DATA_LENGTH-k); j++) // do something to the k'th element and // the j'th element • Total number: n + (n-1) + (n-2) + … + 2 + 1 = n(n+1)/2 = n2/2 + n/2 O(n2)

  14. Complexity: A Real Example • Searching through a list for a value • n is the number of elements in the list • Worst case? • The value cannot be found • Need exactly n comparisons: O(n)

  15. Searching (cont.) • Best case? • It’s the first element! • Unlikely! • Needs only 1 comparison: O(1)

  16. Searching (cont.) • Average case? • Need some assumptions about what “average” means • Assume the value is always found • sometimes near the start • sometimes near the end • On average: halfway through the list • Needs n/2 comparisons: O(n)

  17. Searching (cont.) • Assumption: • The value is found only half of the time Half the time we need n comparisons Half the time we need n/2 (on average) Overall: 3n/4 • Still O(n)

  18. Conclusion • Objective, compiler- and computer-independent ways of comparing algorithms are essential • Order notation provides this

More Related