1 / 23

Research regarding B&ME Groups, VI and take-up of Services

Our Vision Too – Community Views Mark R D Johnson Mary Seacole Research Centre OPSIS Conference: Focus on the Needs of Vision Impaired People from Black & Minority Ethnic Groups ( looking forward to World Sight Day 2007). Research regarding B&ME Groups, VI and take-up of Services.

lestern
Télécharger la présentation

Research regarding B&ME Groups, VI and take-up of Services

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Our Vision Too – Community ViewsMark R D JohnsonMary Seacole Research Centre OPSIS Conference: Focus on the Needs of Vision Impaired People from Black & Minority Ethnic Groups(looking forward toWorld Sight Day 2007) Research regarding B&ME Groups, VI and take-up of Services

  2. Composition of ‘English’ Health & Social Care Users : 2001 13% from a ‘Minority’ group

  3. The Population of Birmingham

  4. The Visual Impairment Register

  5. The Literature Review • Poor quality evidence base • High levels of diabetes lead to an expectation of worse eye health. • Juvenile inherited eye conditions • Raised levels of glaucoma in African Caribbean populations, • Keloid scarring – hinders surgery • More cataract among South Asian origins

  6. The Research Base: • The ‘visual impairment’ research literature tends to ignore issues of race and ethnicity: • that relating to ‘race relations and ethnic diversity’, largely excludes attention to sight loss.

  7. General Consensus • under-use of services by minority groups • and possibly of under-registration. • low levels of knowledge • failure to recognise needs that can be addressed. • Many short-term, unreported and under-evaluated ‘projects’

  8. Factors Affecting Use of Services • Ethnic Differences in Patterns of Disease • Perceptions of Health, Body and Disease • Cultural and Language differences in Descriptions • Accessibility of Services (time and place) • (Previous experiences of) Encounters with Services • Alternative Treatment Options • Lifestyle, Socio-Economic Status, Religion and Cultural practices • Racism – direct, personal, indirect or institutional • Language, Education and Availability of Information • Attitude, Awareness and Skill of Clinical staff

  9. Improvement in Service Uptake Requires • Assertive Outreach, • Cultural Competence, • Partnership with minority ethnic groups • We would add: • Commitment by management • Resources • Persistence

  10. The Aim of the Project • To examine and develop ways of ensuring that services are more effectively delivered to people from black and minority ethnic (BME) communities with visual impairments (VI). • To raise awareness of sight loss issues and services in black and minority ethnic communities and voluntary sector groups working in those communities • To raise the capacity of (VI) service providers to recognise the specific needs of people from minority ethnic groups, and establish the best ways of meeting these.

  11. Some New & Refreshed Insights • a greater level of housing need • culturally specific lifestyle issues • impact on social and religious life • lack of social and family understanding • low expectations – ‘inevitable aging’ • stigma or “false” pride • ‘learned helplessness’ • Responses have to be community-specific

  12. The ‘Good Practice Model’ • Stage 1: Project Initiation: The Conceptualisation and Initial Planning • Stage 2: Recruit Key Worker(s). • Stage 3: Review Local Services • Stage 4: Create Network of Stakeholders • Stage 5: Recruit Community Facilitators • Stage 6: Develop Project Agenda / Topic Guide

  13. The Model – Part Two • Stage 7: Conduct Interviews • Stage 8: Review, Analyse and Feedback • Stage 9: Devise or Refine Training and/or Information Packs • Stage 10: Take Appropriate Action – Further Intervention • Stage 11: Evaluate • Stage 12: (IF Appropriate) Establish and Integrate Learning into Mainstream Practice And How do we do that?

  14. A Checklist of issues to raise with and within communities and organisations NB: Disability Rights are part of the Law A Toolkit Checklist for Service Providers NB: Race Equality Schemes are now required by Law Two Checklists

  15. Key Recommendations: • Sight Loss support services need to recruit staff from within minority communities • Information must be translated into minority languages • Information needs to be actively promoted through community organisations • Sustained effort may be needed to overcome suspicion based on past experiences • Previous initiatives have foundered because of a lack of continuity – a longer-term perspective is required to bring change and create better relationships

  16. The Outcome!

  17. Community Views • Jasbir Behal • Forum – Community, Statutory, VOs &c. • Sight Loss/Eye Health Information Fairs • Lobbying • Publications • More research and development

  18. One new study • Glaucoma awareness and perceptions of risk among African-Caribbeans in Birmingham, UK • Vinette Cross, Peter Shah, Rustom Bativala, Peter Spurgeon • Diversity in Health and Social Care • Volume 2, Number 2, June 2005 , pp. 81-90(10)

  19. Further reading (or via WWW) • Our Vision Too: Improving the Access of Ethnic Minority Visually Impaired People to appropriate services Seacole Research Paper 4 Leicester: MSRC with Housing Corporation and Thomas Pocklington Trust (Asesha Morjaria-Keval and MRD Johnson), February 2005 • ‘Ethnicity, Sight Loss and Invisibility’ British Journal of Visual Impairment Vol 25,1 :23-33 (Johnson MRD, Morjaria-Keval A) 2006 • Research Findings & Occasional Papers – www. pocklington-trust. org. uk

  20. ‘Co-ordinates’ orContact Details • CEEHD - Mary Seacole Research CentreDe Montfort University266 London Road, Leicester LE2 1RQTel: 0116 201 3906 (fax: 0116 201 3805) • seacole@dmu.ac.uk • website: www.dmu.ac.uk/msrc or www.ethnic-health.org.uk • www.library.nhs.uk/ethnicity • www.pocklington-trust.org.uk • NB: minority-ethnic-health@jiscmail.ac.uk

More Related