1 / 6

The IfE absolute gravimetry campaigns 2003, 2004, 2005: an epilogue

The IfE absolute gravimetry campaigns 2003, 2004, 2005: an epilogue. Olga Gitlein, Ludger Timmen. Absolute gravity station distribution. Station occupations by IfE in 2003 – 2005 . 25 different stations. Comparison of 2004 and 2005 results. Absolute gravity difference 2005 – 2004.

levia
Télécharger la présentation

The IfE absolute gravimetry campaigns 2003, 2004, 2005: an epilogue

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The IfE absolute gravimetry campaigns 2003, 2004, 2005: an epilogue Olga Gitlein, Ludger Timmen

  2. Absolute gravity station distribution

  3. Station occupations by IfE in 2003 – 2005 25 different stations

  4. Comparison of 2004 and 2005 results Absolute gravity difference 2005 – 2004 • differences due to: • Uplift signal • measurement uncertainty • Local and regional groundwater • residual air mass effect • Soil moisture • Wind driven sea and ocean water flow Absolute gravity results in 2005 are less than in 2004 at nearly all 13 stations.

  5. Instrumental precision • gravity difference at ~120 cm sensor height from absolute and relative gravity measurements between two pillars at Metsähovi, Onsala and Bad Homburg Onsala ±1…±2 µGal • several setups to minimize the instumental uncertainties (Floor-recoil, azimuth (Coriolis/attrition), setup,…)

  6. Summary of IfE campaigns 2003 – 2005 • 25 different stations occupied by IfE • accuracy for one station determination ±2…±4 µGal • several FG5 setups per station • relative gravimetry: vertical gradients (<±1 µGal) • eccentres (national net points) • monitoring of lokal water level (groundwater, lakes) • monitoring of height changes of absolute gravity point •  levelling to height benchmarks • at nearly all stations continuous GPS available • connection to tide gauges

More Related