Debbie Eremita, MSN, RN Valerie Herbert, MSN, RN
290 likes | 640 Vues
Debbie Eremita, MSN, RN Valerie Herbert, MSN, RN. “Any replication of a real-life event” Utilized in many professions. PILOTS. HEALTHCARE. Military Training. Aviation Simulation Training. Hudson River Crash. Anesthesia Simulation. Healthcare Simulation. Low, Moderate and High Fidelity
Debbie Eremita, MSN, RN Valerie Herbert, MSN, RN
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Debbie Eremita, MSN, RN Valerie Herbert, MSN, RN
“Any replication of a real-life event” Utilized in many professions PILOTS HEALTHCARE
Aviation Simulation Training Hudson River Crash
Low, Moderate and High Fidelity • Fidelity refers to the degree of simulation realism
Low fidelity ---basic mannequin • CPR training models • Arm model for IV training • Hip model for IM injection training • Moderate fidelity • Heart and lung sounds • No movement
High fidelity has an • Operational airway • Ability to blink and speak • Chest walls visibly expands on inspiration and relax on expiration • Heart, lung and bowel sounds are programmable • Interchangeable gender • IV’s, central lines, chest tubes
Respiratory Treatments Chest Tubes
Use of Simulation in Healthcare and Nursing Education • Teaching strategy • Enhances theory learned from classroom • Psychomotor skills • Practice problem solving • Provides critical thinking • Clinical reasoning skills • Facilitates mastery of clinical skills
Demonstrate competence in nursing skills • Critique assessment techniques • Augment clinical experiences • High-risk, low-frequency events • Safe environment
Husson University Creation of Simulation
Creating the Case Study Simulation • The Case: • Links class concepts to learning objectives • Much like a clinical assignment • Pre-clinical assignments • Pre-clinical Rounds • Divided into sections or scenes • Class of 6-8 students—2 students per scene • Debrief entire case study or Post-clinical Rounds • Evaluation Activities
Husson University • Case Study Simulations • Unfolding Scenarios • High Risk-Low Exposure • Practice in Context—Better • outcomes • Bridge Book Learning to • “Real” Patients • Ethical Concerns and • Patient Safety
Currently utilized at following levels: • Fundamentals • Med-Surg I & II • Pediatrics • Maternal-Child Health • Psych-Mental Health • Capstone Partnership
Learn and practice skills • Scenario testing • Simulated clinical experiences • Fundamentals • Med-Surg • Pediatrics • Obstetrics
Collaborate to complement classroom information • Create learning objectives • Identify cognitive and psychomotor skills • Create an electronic medical record • Schedule the simulation
Receive information prior • Report from RN • Perform simulation activity with assigned role such as: • Staff nurse • Family member • Respiratory therapist • Observer • Debriefing session
Discuss simulation progression • Communication with coworkers, family members, and patient • Performance of technical skills • Patient safety maintained?
Benefits • Learning in a non-threatening environment • Practice, practice, practice • Confidence • Better outcomes • Improved patient safety
Development of EBP and Best Practice Utilization • Current EBP indicates IF designed and utilized effectively • Improved Critical Thinking • Improved Decision Making • Improved Content Mastery • Costs • Process of changing Educational Practices • Passive to Active Learning
WhySimulation???? • Today’s Healthcare Environment • Acuity is Higher • Older Population--multiple co-morbidities • Patient’s are sicker • Length of Stay in Hospital is shorter • ......Yet student’s must learn • …..Staff must be competent
Current Utilization • Maine Simulation Programs • Educational • Healthcare • Evidence Based Practice • Research • Pilot Studies
Future Needs of Simulation Needs for Maine…… • Initial stages of Simulation use with isolated pockets • More collaborative opportunities for all healthcare students/professions • Best-Practice use of Simulation • Integration of EBP models within Simulation • QSEN Competencies embedded within Simulation • State Regulations
Bambini, D., Washburn, J., & Perkins, R. (2009). Outcomes of clinical simulation for novice nursing students: Communication, confidence, clinical judgment. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(2), 79-82. Brannan, J. D., White, A., & Bezanson, J. L. (2008). Simulator effects on cognitive skills and confidence levels. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(1), 495-500. Cant, R. P. & Cooper, S. J. (2009). Simulation-based learning in nurse education: Systemic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(1), 3-15. Dreifuerst, K. T. (2009). The essentials of debriefing in simulation learning: A concept analysis. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(2), 109-114. Fountain, R. & Alfred, D. (2009). Student satisfaction with high-fidelity simulation: Does it correlate with learning style? Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(2), 96-98. Harden, N. (2010). Use of simulation in teaching and learning in health sciences: A systemic review. Journal of Nursing Education, 49(1), 23-28.
Jefferies, P. R., Bambini, D., Hansel. D., Moorman, M. & Washburn, J. (2009). Constructing maternal-child learning experiences using clinical simulations. Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecological and Neonatal Nursing, 38, 613-623. Ravert, P. (2008). Patient simulator sessions and critical thinking. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(12), 557-562. Rush, K. L. Dyches, C. E., Waldrop, S. & Davis, A. (2008). Critical thinking among RN-to- BSN distance students participating in human patient simulation. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(11), 501-507. Sears, K., Goldsworthy, S. & Goodman, W. (2010). The relationship between simulation in nursing education and medication safety. Journal of Nursing Education, 49(1), 52-55. Smith, S. J. & Roehrs, C.J. (2009). High-fidelity simulation: Factors correlated with nursing student satisfaction and self-confidence. Nursing Education Perspectives, 30(2), 74-78. Waxman, K.T. (2010). The development of evidence-based clinical simulation scenarios: Guidelines for nurse educators. Journal of Nursing Education, 49(1), 29-35.