1 / 28

Sudden Oak Death: Is the Sky Falling? (or why I should take INT 256)

Sudden Oak Death: Is the Sky Falling? (or why I should take INT 256) Prepared by: Mike Maguire, April 2003 Updated by: W.H. Livingston, February 2005 Web Sites Pest Alert East: http://www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/pest_al/sodeast/sodeast.pdf Pest AlertWest

libitha
Télécharger la présentation

Sudden Oak Death: Is the Sky Falling? (or why I should take INT 256)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sudden Oak Death:Is the Sky Falling?(or why I should take INT 256) Prepared by: Mike Maguire, April 2003 Updated by: W.H. Livingston, February 2005

  2. Web Sites • Pest Alert East: • http://www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/pest_al/sodeast/sodeast.pdf • Pest AlertWest • http://www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/pest_al/sodwest/pdf/sodwest.pdf • California Oak Mortality Task Force • http://nature.berkeley.edu/comtf/html/about_p__ramorum.html • “Minority Report” • http://phytosphere.com/tanoakobservations/tanoak.html

  3. Sudden Oak Death (SOD) • Recent epidemic (1995 - present) • Northern California, southern Oregon • Dying of oak in urban and forested areas • Tanoak (Lithocarpus densiflorus) • California Black Oak (Quercus Kelloggi)

  4. Might cause widespread mortality “New” fungal pathogen in multiple locations – amount of natural resistance uncertain Large number of susceptible species, especially nursery plants Could spread quickly Unknown vector(s) of disease transmission Difficult to identify On nursery plants >$28 million government funding Why Worry? UC Berkeley

  5. Tanoak Black Oak Management • Natural Regeneration • Wildlife • Fuel wood • Pulp • Shade Trees

  6. Tanoak Adaptations • Range: Native to Oregon and California • Climate: Hot dry summers and cool moist winters • Soils: Prefer deep and well drained soils • Disturbance: Very susceptible to fire • Regeneration: Sprout prolifically after fire or harvest • Shade tolerant • Most common hardwood in CA & OR Coast Ranges • Best adapted to Humboldt & Mendocino Counties (northern CA coast)

  7. Other Susceptible Species • Total of 31 species affected • Rhododendron most important • Two types of hosts: • Bark canker hosts: e.g. California black oak and tanoak • Foliar hosts: e.g. tanoak

  8. Symptoms: Bark Canker • Sunken cankers on mature trees • Produce reddish-brown to tar-black viscous seep • Seeping is the most reliable symptom

  9. Symptom: Oak Death • Canker girdles stem • Sudden simultaneous leaf death on a major stem or entire tree (“Sudden Oak <Leaf> Death”)

  10. Symptom: Leaf & Shoot Blight • Most common symptom, especially on Rhododendron

  11. Impact on Oaks • Oak mortality has reached “unprecedented levels,” but can’t find how much • Distribution is patchy but 40%-80% of a stand can be impacted

  12. Pathogen: Overview of Phytopthora Species • Adapted to areas with high moisture • Reproduce both sexually and asexually • Has spore stages that can survive for extended periods, even in adverse conditions

  13. Pathogen: Phytopthora ramorum • Timeline: • Described in Europe – 1993 • Identified in California – 1999 • Difficult to Identify • Approximately 60 similar species • No single symptom is adequate for diagnosis

  14. Fungal Pathogen Signs • No visible signs • Two methods available to identify P. ramorum • Culture fungus from the border of an active infection • Amplify DNA using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

  15. Where Found, What’s at Risk • Coast of northern California • Potential to spread • Further up west cost • Moderate, moist climates in east USFS Photo

  16. Life Cycle of Phytopthora ramorum

  17. Life Cycle • Zoospores infect host • short lived and motile • asexual • swim several feet • Chlamydospores • Go dormant • Can survive environmental extremes • If land on plant, can germinate and infect

  18. Environment Favoring Phytophthora • Cool temperatures (50-65 F) • High moisture levels, water films on leaf and bark surfaces • Proximity of other hosts: (e.g. California bay laurel, Rhododendron, Madrone,) • Forest edges with broad canopies: greater likelihood of spores intercepting tree crowns

  19. Predisposing Factors Related to Degree of Stress • Fog • Precipitation & temperature • El Nino effects? El Niño And La Niña Years: A Consensus List

  20. Predisposing Factors Related to Tree Species Adaptations to Fungus • Largely unknown • P. ramorum is considered very aggressive; can infect and kill healthy trees. • However, • Symptoms appeared simultaneously over a large area • Most severe on tan oak outside of preferred habitat • “Minority Report” • http://phytosphere.com/tanoakobservations/tanoak.html

  21. Pathogen Movement • P. ramorum has been isolated in firewood, leaves, nursery stock, soil, stream water, and rain splash. • Long distance spread may be due to human movement of infested host materials • Local spread of disease may be due to infested soil and rain splash • Insects and/or birds as vectors?

  22. Tan oak abundance affected by land use history • Stems die easy; roots don’t die: 1000 yr old • Regenerated after widespread cutting (after 1930?) • Now mature • Fire exclusion • Increased density and high competition • Tan oak stands have been predisposed to diseases and secondary pests

  23. Predisposing Factors • Presence of P. ramorum • Presence of vulnerable hosts: Maturing tanoak on disturbed sites • Presence of alternate hosts (e.g. Rhododendron, California bay laurel) • Rain/fog belt: geographic area within 50 miles of coast • Excessive rainfall

  24. Contributing Factors • Beetles: Populations have exploded in recent years, usually attacking severely stressed, dying or dead trees • Western Oak Bark Beetle (Pseudopityophthorus pubipennis)*** • Oak Ambrosia Beetle (Monarthrum scutellare) • Minor Oak Ambrosia Beetle (Monarthrum detinger) • Fungus: Associated with dead oaks and tanoaks • Hypoxylon thourarsianum • Drought: Weakens infected trees further

  25. Control Options: Preemptive • Harvest Layout • Avoid in infected areas, especially during wet periods. • Sanitation • Wash stations • Shoes, vehicles, machinery, etc. • Before and after entering uninfected areas • Education and Communication • Focus on locations of infected areas and possible modes of dispersal

  26. Quarantines

  27. Reactive Measures • Prune infected branches and destroy • Cut and Burn • Chemical Control • Agri-fos • Phosphate based • Inject or spray • Shade trees only • No Action

  28. Conclusions • Sudden oak death • Name is bad science – not descriptive • Great for publicity • The disease is complex • Moisture is key predisposing factor • Stressed trees probably important predisposing factor • Pathogen will spread • Been in forest for years? • Efforts to prevent spread of pathogen should continue • Because of cold climate, doubt that pathogen will get established in Northeast. Lacks fog belt, too.

More Related