SlideServe
Menu
Préférences
© SlideServe · v2026

Underwater Noise Impacts of Current and Proposed Projects in North and Central Coast

lihua avatar
20 diapositives · 364 Views · Sep 23, 2014

This report discusses the implications of underwater noise generated by present and planned projects along the North and Central Coast of British Columbia. Managed by Mike Ambach from WWF-Canada, it explores key projects such as LNG developments and shipping trends, assessing their potential effects on marine ecosystems. Emphasizing the need for noise mitigation strategies, the report encourages a shared understanding of future scenarios involving vessel traffic and acoustic impacts in a rapidly changing environment.

Underwater Noise Impacts of Current and Proposed Projects in North and Central Coast - slide 1
01 / 20Underwater Noise Impacts of Current and Proposed Projects in North and Central Coast
1 / 17

Télécharger la présentation

Underwater Noise Impacts of Current and Proposed Projects in North and Central Coast
Une image / un lien ci-dessous est fourni (tel quel) pour télécharger la présentation

Politique de téléchargement : le contenu du site vous est fourni TEL QUEL pour votre information et votre usage personnel ; il ne peut être vendu, concédé sous licence ni partagé sur d’autres sites sans l’accord de son auteur.Le contenu vous est fourni TEL QUEL, pour votre information et votre usage personnel uniquement. Téléchargez la présentation en cliquant sur ce lien. Lors du téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à télécharger une présentation, l’éditeur a peut-être supprimé le fichier de son serveur.Pendant le téléchargement, si vous ne parvenez pas à obtenir une présentation, le fichier a peut-être été supprimé par l’éditeur.

F I N

Plus de contenu associé

Transcription de la présentation
  1. Current and proposed projects with underwater noise implications for the North and Central Coast. Mike Ambach North Coast Program Manager WWF-Canada mambach@wwfcanada.org Photo credit: Mike Ambach

  2. Stewart BC’s North Coast DIXON ENTRANCE CHATHAM SOUND HECATE STRAIT DOULGAS CHANNEL CAAMANOSOUND

  3. Sources Thank you. • MCTS data • Prince Rupert LNG Project Description 2013 • Pacific Northwest LNG Project Description 2013 • LNG Canada Project Description 2013 • Transport Canada TERMPOL Assessment for Enbridge Northern Gateway 2012 • Shipping on the British Columbia Coast: Current Status, Projected Trends, Potential Casualties, and Our Ability to Respond: A Briefing Report 2011 • BC Shipping News • Prince Rupert Port Authority Annual Reports • PRPA: Shipping Trends and Future Activity on BC North Coast 2012 • Aleutian Islands Risk Assessment Study 2010 • Southeast Alaska Vessel Traffic Study 2012 • PNCIMA Atlas 2012 • BCMCA Marine Atlas of Pacific Canada 2012 • Port of Kitimat Economic Development Statistics, Major Projects briefs • Origin, Destination & Marine Traffic Volume Survey TERMPOL Surveys and Studies 2010 • District of Kitimat Investment Summary 2013-2015 • Kitimat Modernization Project • Stewart Bulk Terminals Expansion Project • Northwest BC Major Projects, Terrace Economic Development Association 2011 • Adding it All Up Conference Proceedings, 2012 Bulkley Valley Research Institute • Canada LNG Project Description • PRPA Land Use Plan 2020 • Transportation Assessment of the Central and North Coast of British Columbia March 2, 2009

  4. _by region 2006 2013 2018 2024 * Approximations based on multiple data sources

  5. _by vessel class 2006 2013 2018 2024 * Approximations based on multiple data sources

  6. _ by existing and proposed 2006 2013 2018 2024 * Approximations based on multiple data sources

  7. _ existing and proposed 2006 2013 2018 2024 * Approximations based on multiple data sources

  8. Vessel Categories 2012 Prince Rupert Zone Movement, total sector transits (from MCTS data)

  9. Source: Southeast Alaska Vessel Traffic Study 2012

  10. A few caveats… • Does not represent seasonal variation • Does not represent ship presence • Does not reflect variability in ship size • Does not capture tug-related service for construction phases, or operation presence • Resource extraction projects have lifespans Photo credit: Mike Ambach

  11. Non-shipping • Ocean Renewables • Seismic • Construction • Small Vessels Photo credit: Mike Ambach

  12. Typical Timeline: When and how does sound get identified? Source: Pacific Northwest LNG Project Description

  13. Geographic Scope

  14. Sound as a Valued Ecosystem Component?

  15. Gold Rush Mitigation • Baseline? • Seasonal variation? • Geographic range of acoustic impacts? • Masking effect? • Cumulative effects, including “reasonably foreseeable future projects” A common, shared understanding of realistic future scenarios.

  16. Source: Aleutian Islands Risk Assessment, Phase A – Preliminary Risk AssessmentDet Norske Veritas (2010)

  17. Source: Aleutian Islands Risk Assessment, Phase A – Preliminary Risk AssessmentDet Norske Veritas (2010)

  18. Source: Aleutian Islands Risk Assessment, Phase A – Preliminary Risk AssessmentDet Norske Veritas (2010)

  19. Discussion How to plan around (noise) mitigation in a rapidly changing environment? What is essential to know about proposed/new vessel traffic now, and how can that flow of information be facilitated?