1 / 17

Study of Low- a p Lattice Options for a Super-PEP HER

Study of Low- a p Lattice Options for a Super-PEP HER. U. Wienands SLAC PEP-II. Context for the Super-PEP HER. Would like to maintain r dipole =165 m ∆E/turn ≈ 2.2 MV at 8.5 GeV, 1/ r 2 every arc-cell filled with a dipole in PEP-II Will likely want a smaller emittance than for PEP-II

liko
Télécharger la présentation

Study of Low- a p Lattice Options for a Super-PEP HER

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Study of Low-ap Lattice Options for a Super-PEP HER U. Wienands SLAC PEP-II U. Wienands, SLAC-PEP-II Super-B Hawaii Apr-05

  2. Context for the Super-PEP HER • Would like to maintain rdipole=165 m • ∆E/turn ≈ 2.2 MV at 8.5 GeV, 1/r2 • every arc-cell filled with a dipole in PEP-II • Will likely want a smaller emittance than for PEP-II • PEP-II HER has 48 nmr nominal • For Super-B, will likely want to reduce this to 40 or even 28 nmr. • Will want a low momentum-compaction factor • PEP-II: 0.00241–>0.00167 • Super-B: 0.0006…0.0001 U. Wienands, SLAC-PEP-II Super-B Hawaii Apr-05

  3. How to Achieve low ap • ap ≈ h => high tune nx • practical limit, acceptance limit • also reduces the beam emittance • Modulate bending or focusing, forcing h down in dipoles • Teng & Ohnuma: ≤360° phase advance/period • Potential to reduce ap < 0 • Potentially increases beam emittance (≈ B2) U. Wienands, SLAC-PEP-II Super-B Hawaii Apr-05

  4. Candidate Superperiods • 90° cells: • LEB-type Period: DOFO with BB00BB bending • high dispersion in empty cells, low/negative in bending cells • dipole packing factor is low • KAON-Factory type cell: FODO, full cells, modulate quads • high packing factor • large dispersion swings for low/negative ap • In either of these, emittance is traded for momentum compaction. U. Wienands, SLAC-PEP-II Super-B Hawaii Apr-05

  5. HER Sextant, 90° cell ap = 0.0006 ex = 50 nmr 4 periods+nsup=16 cells rdipole = 165 m U. Wienands, SLAC-PEP-II Super-B Hawaii Apr-05

  6. What about negative ap? ap = -0.0002/period, but +0.00028/sext. ex = 68 nmr 4 periods+nsup=16 cells rdipole = 165 m U. Wienands, SLAC-PEP-II Super-B Hawaii Apr-05

  7. Can’t get negative ap easily, and ex already too large • It turns out the h suppressors raise ap considerably • ap = (ap(periods)*lperiods+ap(hsup)*lsup)/larc • ap(hsup) is large, therefore have to make these short! • Shorten the dipoles in the high-h cells to lower ex • this lowers the bending radius… U. Wienands, SLAC-PEP-II Super-B Hawaii Apr-05

  8. U. Wienands, SLAC-PEP-II Super-B Hawaii Apr-05

  9. Not promising! • lowest emittance achieved: 56 nmr (empty high-h cells) • sr. energy loss up by more than a factor of 2 U. Wienands, SLAC-PEP-II Super-B Hawaii Apr-05

  10. Half-length Dipoles in High-h cells ap = +0.00025/sext. ex = 61 nmr 4 periods+nsup=16 cells rdipole = 139 m U. Wienands, SLAC-PEP-II Super-B Hawaii Apr-05

  11. Where to go from here? • For our case, shortening the h suppressors only marginally sucessful • overall arc length has to stay due to tunnel geometry • => dipoles get longer, or stronger => emittance  • Need to look into more exotic alternatives • start with stronger focusing • 108°/cell, 135°/cell, … • lower natural emittance, • less modulation needed to lower ap to desired value U. Wienands, SLAC-PEP-II Super-B Hawaii Apr-05

  12. Try 135°/cell • one period = two cells: 270° • should be able to lower ap by quad. modulation • should be able to find 180° locations for sextupoles… U. Wienands, SLAC-PEP-II Super-B Hawaii Apr-05

  13. 135°/cell Period, ap=0 ap = 0/cell ex = 20 nmr 7 periods+nsup=16 cells rdipole = 165 m U. Wienands, SLAC-PEP-II Super-B Hawaii Apr-05

  14. 135° Lattice (cont’d) • Closer inspection of this lattice reveals that • X chromaticity compensation should be easy • Y chromaticity compensation ≈ impossible • high ßy locations have almost no dispersion •  • Can we modify design for vertical chroma. correction • idea: raise ßy at high-dispersion location U. Wienands, SLAC-PEP-II Super-B Hawaii Apr-05

  15. 135° Lattice with Doublet U. Wienands, SLAC-PEP-II Super-B Hawaii Apr-05

  16. Raise ßy/ßx at end to about 3:1 • may be sufficient in principle • But: • xy now up to 7 units in ∂n/(∂p/p), • likely too high for required acceptance U. Wienands, SLAC-PEP-II Super-B Hawaii Apr-05

  17. Conclusion (for now) • As expected, a low-ap lattice for a Super-PEP HER is not easy to find. • For 90°/cell, ap ≈ 0.0006 seems to be about as low as it will go, in the PEP-II context (ex, tunnel, s.r.) • very preliminary tracking suggests chromaticity correction is feasible. • For comparison, the 90° HER lattice for PEP-II will have ap ≈ 0.00167. • For 135°/cell, lower ap is feasible to 1st order, but chromaticity correction will be a major challenge. U. Wienands, SLAC-PEP-II Super-B Hawaii Apr-05

More Related