1 / 21

Miguel Ángel Verdugo, Manuela Crespo y Cristina Jenaro INICO. Universidad de Salamanca (SPAIN)

APPLICATION OF THE SCALE ON QUALITY OF LIFE FROM SCHALOCK AND KEITH (1993) IN ADULTS WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES IN LABOUR CONTEXTS 12 th IASSID World Congress. Miguel Ángel Verdugo, Manuela Crespo y Cristina Jenaro INICO. Universidad de Salamanca (SPAIN). OBJETIVES.

lila-le
Télécharger la présentation

Miguel Ángel Verdugo, Manuela Crespo y Cristina Jenaro INICO. Universidad de Salamanca (SPAIN)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. APPLICATION OF THE SCALE ON QUALITY OF LIFE FROM SCHALOCK AND KEITH (1993) IN ADULTS WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES IN LABOUR CONTEXTS12 th IASSID World Congress Miguel Ángel Verdugo, Manuela Crespo y Cristina Jenaro INICO. Universidad de Salamanca (SPAIN)

  2. OBJETIVES • To determine if different labor situations influence the quality of life. • To determine if some individual characteristic influence the quality of life.

  3. HYPOTHESIS • Higher the labor inclusion, higher the quality of life. • Higher the academic status or training received, higher the quality of life. • Some personal characteristic will be related to a lower quality of life. • Age and sex sociodemographic variables, will not affect to the quality of life. • Some environmental conditions will be related to higher quality of life.

  4. PARTICIPANTS424 workers with intellectual disability, over 18 years

  5. Participants: Spain Regions

  6. Participants: Gender

  7. Participants: other characteristics • 43,9% between 22 and 30 years of age. • More than 80% live in family homes. • Almost half of the sample live in homes with 3 to 4 members. • 38,2% in the Primary Education. • 90,1% have intellectual disability. • 70,8% do not show behavior problems. • 63% work in services, and 38,9% have a contract. • Almost half of the sample need some adaptations.

  8. Participants: Academic background

  9. Participants: Level of disability

  10. SCHALOCK AND KEITH (1993) QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE • Assesses the quality of life perceived by adults with and without intellectual disabilities. • It is composed of 40 items grouped into 4 scales: • Satisfaction Scale • Competence/Productivity Scale • Self-determination/Independence Scale • Social Belonging/Community Integration Scale.

  11. RELIABILITY • Internal consistency was calculated: • Split-half correlation with Spearman-Brown correction: coefficients higher than .80- • Cronbach’s Alpha:  = .83 • Reliability among judges: • Cronbach’s Alpha:  = .97.

  12. Agreement among expert judges • High agreement concerning to the belonging of the items to one or anothercategory : = .95. • Acceptable agreement regarding intensity: = .33. • High agreement in relation to thevalency: = .84. Items of the original Questionnaire are maintained at their corresponding factors

  13. RELIABILITY

  14. VALIDITY • Content validity: • bibliographicalrevision:quality of life includes aspects related to welfare, satisfaction and social integration. • consultation to judges: = .97. • Construct validity: • factor analysis:correct match between items and scales.

  15. PROCEDURE • 1. First appointment and ca´´for participation: • To explain the objectives of the research. • To respond to their questions. • To resolve their doubts. • 2. Application of the Questionnaire: • Members of INICO. • Professionals from the centers. • 3. Analysis of data: ANOVA.

  16. RESULTS (I) **sinificant, with p<0,01;*significant, with p<0,05

  17. RESULTS (I) ** Significant, with p<0,01; * Significant, with p<0,05

  18. RESULTS (II) **significant, with p<0,01;* significant, with p<0,05

  19. RESULTS (II) **Significant, with p<0,01; * Significant, with p<0,05

  20. SUMMARY • The higher the labor inclusion, the higher the global quality of life, competence and self-determination. • Academic background influences the global quality of life, competence and self-determination. • Some individual characteristic are related to lower quality of life, competence and self-determination. • Gender does not affect the quality of life. • Some environmental conditions are related to higher quality of life and greater self-determination.

  21. DISCUSSION • The Quality of Life Scale allows measure the quality of life of Spanish adults with intellectual disability. • Participants are satisfied with their working status and they are interested in learning activities • It is necessary to provide the required supports and adaptations. • It is necessary to promote a change of attitudes in the community.

More Related