1 / 9

Environmental Policy

Class 26: Toxic & Hazardous Substances CofC Fall 2010. Environmental Policy. Glen Avon Case. Toxic litigation 200 + chemicals in 34m gals of waste dumped into Stringfellow Canyon ‘56-’72 37 yrs after closing $150m on cleanup $96m on settlements 17 acres contaminated land .

lilia
Télécharger la présentation

Environmental Policy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Class 26: Toxic & Hazardous Substances CofC Fall 2010 Environmental Policy

  2. Glen Avon Case • Toxic litigation • 200 + chemicals in 34m gals of waste dumped into Stringfellow Canyon ‘56-’72 • 37 yrs after closing • $150m on cleanup • $96m on settlements • 17 acres contaminated land

  3. Toxic Cases • Large Liability • Yet mounting scientific uncertainty around extent of public risk from exposure to manufactured, stored and abandoned chemical substances • Precautionary principle? • “No other area of enviro regulation has scientific uncertainty about the extent of the risk and identity of hazardous substances been greater or more public.” (p242)

  4. Inheritance of Chemicals • Chemicals • Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals • Chemical Testing • Toxics • Abandoned Wastes

  5. Chemical Facts • Inheritance from the global “chemical revolution” just after WWII • Explosion of synthetic chemicals—more than 4 million had been registered by mid ‘60s • 500-1000 new chemicals created annually • 35,000 are used daily in US Industry • EPA has 10,000 new chems pending review • Although 98% are considered harmless, no requirements to test ~700 new chems introduced every yr. • 1 ton of hazardous waste is created for every American every yr

  6. Hazardous chemicals • Only a small % are actually tested, e.g. • EPA’s “list of toxic concern in air”  16% • Pesticides of concern  13% of total • Chems most in need of testing under Toxic Substance Control Act  2% tested • 24 fed laws and 12 fed agencies designed to regulate the full range of toxic substances • Impeded by disagreements over health risks as well as lack of accurate information on chemicals • Pesticides: 25 used on corn, 24 on apples, 23 on tomatoes, etc.  use fungicides, Insecticides, herbicides and sprout inhibitors

  7. Toxics • Difficult to regulate: • More toxics/chemicals to regulate • Greater mandates by new legislation • Growing number of “hazardous waste sites” • SC: 26 (17th most) • Abandoned Wastes • “Love Canal” led to Superfund law in 1980 which included $1.6b to clean up nation’s worst sites • By 1990, it was evident this wasn’t close to enough—too many, not enough $$ • Superfund works at “glacial pace” and can’t account for new sites added—huge backlog • Liquid waste is dispersed deep into underground cavities or into water systems

  8. Problems with Regulation • Prevalent in our society  increasing use of toxics • Risks: Continued uncertainty around risk to human health  requires more studies and longer term • Costs: exponential cost to research, regulate growing number of toxics and wastes and sites • Complexity: Growing complexity to research, test implement, create stnds, and litigation • BCA (bene/cost): costs are usually tangible and upfront, while benefits intangible, down the road and hard to calculate

  9. Hazardous Waste in SC • SC Superfund Sites (EPA) • Love Canal Part I • Love Canal Part II

More Related