1 / 4

South Dakota V. Dole

South Dakota V. Dole. Emily Curley . Background . In 1984, the legal drinking age in the United States was raised to 21 for the entire nation.

liliha
Télécharger la présentation

South Dakota V. Dole

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. South Dakota V. Dole Emily Curley

  2. Background • In 1984, the legal drinking age in the United States was raised to 21 for the entire nation. • South Dakota did not want to follow this rule, so the government decided to withhold federal funding unless they changed their rules in accordance to federal law. • The state of South Dakota sued Secretary of Transportation Elizabeth Dole because her office was enforcing the legislation.

  3. Ruling • Congress ruled in favor of Dole because they believed that Congress was not overstepping its powers because it was in the state’s best interest and safety. • 5-7 ruling, Judge Rhenquist resided.

  4. Connection to Federalism • This case is very closely related to federalism as the federal government stepped in to take away the state’s right to make it’s own decision about the minimum drinking age in South Dakota. • In this case, the state’s rights did not prevail

More Related