1 / 46

Parton energy loss in heavy-ion collisions from RHIC to LHC

Parton energy loss in heavy-ion collisions from RHIC to LHC. Andrea Dainese INFN Legnaro. Layout. The discovery of “jet quenching” at RHIC High- p T particle production in nucleus-nucleus collisions, according to perturbative QCD Calculating parton energy loss (BDMPS framework)

lilika
Télécharger la présentation

Parton energy loss in heavy-ion collisions from RHIC to LHC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Parton energy lossin heavy-ion collisionsfrom RHIC to LHC Andrea Dainese INFN Legnaro Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  2. Layout • The discovery of “jet quenching” at RHIC • High-pT particle production in nucleus-nucleus collisions, according to perturbative QCD • Calculating parton energy loss (BDMPS framework) • Light-flavour hadron suppression in the Parton Quenching Model at RHIC andLHC • Energy loss for heavy quarks • RHIC: electrons RAA vs data • LHC: testing E loss with heavy-to-light ratios • Conclusions Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  3. PHENIX p0 (0-10%) Discovery at RHIC:high-pT suppression • Nuclear modification factor of pT distributions: factor 5 suppression! compilation by D.d’Enterria Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  4. What about jets? pp  2 back-to-back jets Jets via di-hadron correlations: • trigger: highest-pT track, (4--6 GeV) • Df distribution: 2 GeV < pT < pTtrigger near side away side STAR Coll., PRL 90 (2003) 082302. slide courtesy of P.Jacobs Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  5. Discovery at RHIC:no away-side jet in central Au-Au • Quantified via ratio of integrals: ~1 in peripheral AA ~0 in central AA STAR Coll., PRL 90 (2003) 082302. Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  6. Final-state effect Is it final-state energy loss? • … or saturation of the parton densities in the initial nuclei? Control experiment, without medium: d-Au no high-pT suppression the away-side jet is there PHENIX Coll., PRL 91 (2003) 072303. STAR Coll., PRL 91 (2003) 072304. Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  7. figure by D. d’Enterria Final-state effect Is it final-state energy loss? • … or saturation of the parton densities in the initial nuclei? “Control experiment”, with medium-blind probe: g’s in Au-Au no suppression, but Ncoll scaling Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  8. h RAB Au 1 medium formed in the collision q q Au q h q ~2-4 GeV/c pT kLkT fgPb / fgp Q2 = 5 GeV2 Cronin enhancement h p pp  h+X LHCRHICSPS RAA<1~1>1 q p h x High-pT particle prod. in AA collisions • A schematic view: • Ingredients: • pp baseline (pQCD) • initial-state effects: • PDF (anti)shadowing • kT broadening (Cronin) • final-state effects: • energy loss • in-medium hadronization (coalescence) Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  9. … Parton Energy Loss • Partons travel ~4 fm in the high-density medium • Bjorken (`82): energy loss due to elastic scattering Bjorken, FERMILAB-Pub-82/59-THY (1982). Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  10. path length L hard parton Parton QCD Energy Loss • Partons travel ~4 fm in the high colour-density medium • Successive calculations (`92 ): a QCD mechanism dominates, medium-inducedgluon radiation • Coherent wave-function gluon acummulates kT due to multiple inelastic scatterings in the medium  it decoheres and is radiated kT Gyulassy, Pluemer, Wang, Baier, Dokshitzer, Mueller, Peigne’, Schiff, Levai, Vitev, Zhakarov, Salgado, Wiedemann, … Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  11. path length L w kT l Calculating Parton Energy Loss BDMPS-Z formalism STATIC MEDIUM transport coefficient Radiated-gluon energy distrib.: (BDMPS case) Casimir coupling factor: 4/3 for q, 3 for g sets the scale of the radiated energy related to constraint kT <w, controls shape at w << wc Baier, Dokshitzer, Mueller, Peigne‘, Schiff, NPB 483 (1997) 291. Zakharov, JTEPL 63 (1996) 952. Salgado, Wiedemann, PRD 68(2003) 014008. Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  12. Finite parton energy (qualitatively) • If E < wc (e.g. small pT parton with large L): • dependence on parton energy • : smaller sensitivity to density Calculating Parton Energy Loss gluons volume-density and interaction cross section Probe the medium Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  13. pT dN/dpT PYTHIA Fragmentation pT – DE pT Application: Parton Quenching Model • BDMPS + Glauber-based medium geometry and density profile + PYTHIA for parton generation and fragmentation • The procedure in short: • generate parton (q or g) with PYTHIA (or back-to-back pair) • calculate its L and average along the path • use quenching weights (from wdI/dw) to get energy loss • quench parton and then hadronize it (independent fragm.) Dainese, Loizides, Paic, EPJC 38 (2005) 461. Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  14. (Quark Matter 05) matches pT-indepence of suppression at high pT Model vs RHIC “light” data • Density ( ) “tuned” to match RAA in central Au-Au at 200 GeV Similar results by Eskola, Honkanen, Salgado, Wiedemann Dainese, Loizides, Paic, EPJC 38 (2005) 461. Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  15. pT > 4.5 GeV Model vs RHIC dataCentrality dependence of RAA • Centrality evolution according to Glauber-model collision geometry Dainese, Loizides, Paic, EPJC 38 (2005) 461. Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  16. STAR preliminary Charged hadrons Testing L-dependence? RAA for 63Cu-63Cu RAA Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  17. PHENIX p0 v2 v2 from E loss: Dainese, Loizides, Paic, EPJC 38 (2005) 461 Testing L-dependence? v2 at high pT from E loss • The azimuthal asymmetry --v2 or RAA(f)-- of high-pT particle yields in non-central collisions tests the path-length dependence of E loss (almond-shaped medium) Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  18. Extrapolation in c.m.s. energyIntermediate RHIC energy s = 62 GeV • Extrapolation in s: assuming  Ngluons/volume  (s)0.6 (EKRT saturation model) • First test: energy extrapolation works reasonably well EKRT: Eskola, Kajantie, Ruuskanen, Tuominen, NPB 570 (2000) 379. PHENIX Coll., JPG 31 (2005) S473. Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  19. Model prediction for LHC • Extrapolation to LHC according to saturation model gives: • Most partons are absorbed • Already at RHIC, only those from the surface can escape … surface emission dominates Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  20. Model vs RHIC dataDisappearence of the away-side jet near side away side STAR Coll., nucl-ex/0501016. Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  21. Observation of true di-jets in Au-Au STAR Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  22. Di-jets associated yields (IAA) Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  23. Tangential di-jets? Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  24. Putting the pieces together Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  25. ? large  RAA indep. of Limited sensitivity of RAA • Strong suppression requires very large density • Surface emission scenario • RAA determined by geometry rather than by density itself • Limited sensitivity to • Need more differential observables: • massive partons • study of jet shapes • … Eskola, Honkanen, Salgado, Wiedemann, NPA 747 (2005) 511. Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  26. Heavy Quarks Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  27. Gluonsstrahlung probability Dokshitzer Q Lower E loss for heavy quarks ? • In vacuum, gluon radiation suppressed at q < mQ/EQ  “dead cone” effect • Dead cone implies lower energy loss(Dokshitzer-Kharzeev, 2001): • energy distribution wdI/dw of radiated gluons suppressed by angle-dependent factor • suppress high-w tail Dokshitzer, Khoze, Troyan, JPG 17 (1991) 1602. Dokshitzer and Kharzeev, PLB 519 (2001) 199. Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  28. m/E = 0.1 massive massless dead cone Lower E loss for heavy quarks ? • Detailed massive calculation shows that: Medium-induced gluon radiation fills the dead cone Still, kT-integrated radiation is suppressed, but only for quite large m/E (i.e. large m, low pT)* kT R = 105 *Warning: large uncertainties Armesto, Salgado, Wiedemann, PRD 69 (2004) 114003. Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  29. Model for heavy quarks • Initially only charm • Baseline at RHIC: PYTHIA, with EKS98 shadowing, tuned to match pT-shape of D cross section measured in d-Au by STAR (QM04) • Heavy-quark E loss using (m/E)-dependent QW • extracted from p0,hRAA (central) • Thermalize charms that lose all energy dN/dmTmT exp(-mT/T), T = 300 MeV baseline dN/dpT baseline RAA Armesto, Dainese, Salgado, Wiedemann, PRD 71 (2005) 054027. EKS98: Eskola, Kolhinen, Salgado, EPJC 9 (1999) 61. Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  30. other contributions become important larger uncertainties Charm RAA at RHIC (extracted from light-hadron data) effect of the mass thermalized component Small effect of mass for charm (~50% for D, ~30% for e) at low pT [large uncertainties!] Basically no effect in “safe” pT-region Armesto, Dainese, Salgado, Wiedemann, PRD 71 (2005) 054027. Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  31. Large uncertainty on b/c crossing point in pT: from scales/masses variation it changes from 3 to 9 GeV PHENIX hep-ex/0508034 Note: still, electron cross section in pp at 200 GeV underestimated at high pT Charm + beauty + DY electrons at RHIC(pQCD baseline revised, and its uncertainties) FONLL: electron spectrum may be ~50% c + ~50% b for 3 < pT < 8 GeV Drell-Yan component investigated as well: < 10% up to 10 GeV FONLL calculation: Cacciari, Nason, Vogt, PRL95 (2005) 122001 Drell-Yan from: Gavin et al., hep-ph/9502372 Comparison: Armesto, Cacciari, Dainese, Salgado, Wiedemann, hep-ph/0511257 Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  32. Theory predicts e RAA (~0.4)larger than p RAA (~0.2) e spectra in principle sensitive to mass hierarchy Perturbative uncertainty on the pp baseline comparable to model-intrinsic uncertainty in determination of Preliminary STAR data not conclusive for comparison with theory RAA of c and b electrons at RHIC • Due to larger mass of b quark electron RAA increased to ~0.4 • Mass uncertainty (in E loss) and scales uncertainty (in pQCD  b/c crossing) were studied b c+b c Armesto, Cacciari, Dainese, Salgado, Wiedemann, hep-ph/0511257 Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  33. Heavy Quark Energy Loss at LHC • ~100 cc pairs and ~5 bb pairs per central Pb-Pb collision • Experiments will measure with good precision RAA for D and B, and for their decay leptons What can we learn from a comparative quenching study of massive and massless probes at the LHC? Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  34. Heavy Flavour RAA at LHC • Baseline: PYTHIA, with EKS98 shadowing, tuned to reproduce c and b pT distributions from NLO pQCD (MNR) • (m/E)-dep. E loss with • * EKRT Saturation model: Eskola, Kajantie, Ruuskanen, Tuominen, NPB 570 (2000) 379. Armesto, Dainese, Salgado, Wiedemann, PRD 71 (2005) 054027. MNR: Mangano, Nason, Ridolfi, NPB 373 (1992) 295. Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  35. mass effect For 10 < pT < 20 GeV, charm behaves like a m=0 quark, light-flv hadrons come mainly from gluons RD/h enhancement probes colour-charge dep. of E loss RB/h enhancement probes mass dep. of E loss Colour-charge and mass dep. of E loss with Heavy-to-Light ratios at LHC Heavy-to-light ratios: Compare g  h , c  D and b  B Armesto, Dainese, Salgado, Wiedemann, PRD71 (2005) 054027 Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  36. Beauty-to-Charm ratio: RB/D • Compare c and b  same colour charge • Mass effect  Enhancement of factor ~2, independent of (for ) • Challenging from experimental point of view… Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  37. Summary • One of the most exciting discoveries at RHIC ! • We are dealing with energy loss in an extremely opaque medium, but … • theoretically, we are just starting to learn how to probe the medium; still large uncertainties (see also next talk) • experimentally, going to more differential observables • vs system size / azimuthal angle (path-length dependence) • vs quark mass -- c (b) SUPPRESSED at RHIC, but need to disentangle c and b to clarify picture • The LHC will be a `hard / heavy probes machine’ and quenching studies will play a central role • Example: Heavy-to-light ratios as probes of E loss… • … colour-charge dependence (RD/h) • … parton-mass dependence (RB/h, RB/D?) Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  38. EXTRA SLIDES Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  39. NA57 PLB623 (2005) 17 NA49, QM2005 E loss (Wang) Parton energy loss at SPS (s  17 GeV)?RCP(K) vs E loss calculations • Wang calculation: pQCD + Cronin + (anti-)shadowing + energy loss (gluon density scaled by dNch/dh) • Good agreement between data and both Wang and PQM calculations ( ) Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  40. Open points (2): the opacity problem • Can we really probe the medium? • Need to relate extracted to an energy density e • QCD estimate for ideal QGP: • A recent analysis* of RHIC data, similar to that presented, extracts energy density 5 larger than that estimated from produced transverse energy dET/dy (Bjorken estimate) • Opacity problem: the interaction of the hard parton with the medium is much stronger than expected (Baier) Baier, NPA 715 (2003) 209. * Eskola, Honkanen, Salgado, Wiedemann, NPA 747 (2005) 511. Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  41. Collisional energy loss revisited Mustafa and Thoma, Acta Phys.Hung. A22, 93 (2005) Earlier estimates: collisional (elastic) energy loss is negligible relative to radiative effects New estimate: Boltzmann transport + 1-D Bjorken expansion Q(p) = RAA RAA = 0.25-0.4 for reasonable pathlength, similar to radiative E-loss Can we really ignore collisional energy loss? Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  42. 8 < pT(trig) < 15 GeV/c STAR Preliminary pT(assoc) > 5 GeV/c 1/Ntrig dN/dj Reappearance of di-jets:surface emission of tangential partons? Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  43. Medium Expansion • The density of scattering centres is time-dependent: a = 1.5, 1.0, 0.5, 0 • Dynamical scaling law: same spectrum obtained for equivalent static trasport coefficient • Calculations for a static medium apply to expanding systems Salgado and Wiedemann, PRL 89 (2002) 092303 Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  44. Static vs Bjorken Expansion Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  45. Static vs Bjorken: numbers Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

  46. f = p/2 f = 0 Armesto, Cacciari, Dainese, Salgado, Wiedemann, hep-ph/0511257, PLB to appear v2 at high pT from E loss • The azimuthal asymmetry --v2 or RAA(f)-- of D and B mesons in non-central collisions tests: • at low/moderate pT: recombination scenario, v2 of c/b quarks, hence degree of thermalization of medium • at higher pT: path-length dependence of E loss (almond-shaped medium => v2~ 0.05--0.10) STAR results withdrawn; new analysis in progress PHENIX p0 v2 Cole @ Quark Matter 05 v2 from E loss: Dainese, Loizides, Paic, EPJC 38 (2005) 461 Padova, 09.05.2006 Andrea Dainese

More Related