1 / 14

Pediatric Pain: Assessment and treatment

Pediatric Pain: Assessment and treatment. Cheryl Stohler RN BSN Wolfson Children’s Hospital Children’s Ambulatory Center 2013 . The absolute value of the pain-intensity score is not as important as the changes in scores in each individual child.

lilka
Télécharger la présentation

Pediatric Pain: Assessment and treatment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pediatric Pain:Assessment and treatment Cheryl Stohler RN BSN Wolfson Children’s Hospital Children’s Ambulatory Center 2013

  2. The absolute value of the pain-intensity score is not as important as the changes in scores in each individual child. • Trending is most important to assess progress of pain control • Scoring shows effectiveness of pain interventions

  3. Wong Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale Research suggest that FACES is the preferred method for identifying pain in children ages 3-18. Advantages: Quick and simple to use Minimal instructions required Translated into >10 languages Preferred by children and nurses Available free of charge Can be used in conjunction with VAS Disadvantages: Confuses affect (smiles/tears) with pain intensity Ratings are higher than on scales with a neutral “no-pain” face Limited psychometric testing of translations

  4. VAS = visual analogue scale Rating scale of 0 for no pain and 10 severe pain Best used with school age children with concept of numbers Advantages: Simple and quick to score Avoids imprecise descriptive terms Provides measuring points Can be used in conjunction with faces scale Disadvantages: Require cognitive and linguistic development Need of concentration and coordination (difficult for sedated or neurological disorders)

  5. FLACC Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale F = Face L = Legs A = Activity C= Cry C= Consolability Advantages: Uses for infants and non-verbal children Observational expression Use for children below age 2 months-7years old Calculation of pain score in EMR Disadvantages: Observational expression In older children may contain expressive behavior –not pain

  6. Types of pain Acute – surgical, procedures, accidents/injuries Continuous/Chronic – JA, neurological/neuropathy pains, cancers, osteo’s’ Disease associated (periodic) - sickle cell, CF, MS, asthmas

  7. Types of pain control • Pharmalogical vs. non-pharmalogical • Topical/local • Oral • IV • IM • “Around the clock” dosing • “As needed” dosing • Patient – controlled analgesia

  8. Documentation in EMR • Assessment - what scale was used? What medication would be most appropriate to use? • Treatment – what was done • Re-assessment – was it effective? • Education – was the parent educated on the medication?

  9. LOOK MOM – NO PAIN!!

  10. References Chiaretti, A., Pierri, F., Valentini, P., Russo, I., Gargiullo, L. & Riccardi, R. (2013). Current practice and recent advances in pediatric pain management. European Review for Medical and Pharmacoloical Sciences 17(1), 112-126 Messerer, B., Gutmann, A., Weinber, A. & Sandner-Kiesling, A. (2010) Implementation of a standardized pain management in a pediatric surgery unit. Pediatric Surgery Int. 26, 879-889. doi: 10.1007/s00383-010-2642-1 Tomlinson, D., Baeyer, C., Stinson, J. & Sung, L. (2010) A systematic review of faces scales for the self-report of pain intensity in children. Pediatrics 126(5)

More Related