1 / 21

Redesign of General Psychology

Redesign of General Psychology. Dr. Megan E. Bradley, Professor of Psychology @ Frostburg State University mbradley@frostburg.edu. Getting Started on Course Redesign NOVA, 10/21/11. Frostburg State University. Psyc150: General Psychology Course characteristics

lilka
Télécharger la présentation

Redesign of General Psychology

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Redesign of General Psychology Dr. Megan E. Bradley, Professor of Psychology @ Frostburg State University mbradley@frostburg.edu Getting Started on Course Redesign NOVA, 10/21/11

  2. Frostburg State University • Psyc150: General Psychology • Course characteristics • Annual enrollment: About 900 • Mostly traditional students and 1st year students • Required course for Psychology Majors and 5 other majors • Academic Issues • Course drift & inefficiency • Financial difficulties at University level

  3. Course Redesign Team • Primary Team (who were also tech savvy): • Coordinator • FT Faculty member who did not teach PSYC 150 at FSU • 1 FT faculty member • Regularly taught PSYC 150 • 1 Adjunct instructor • Instructional Designer & regularly taught PSYC 150 • Administration: • Dean • Associate Provost • Publisher: • Worth

  4. What We Did • Chose Replacement Model • Pilot semester • Comparison: • 2 traditional sections (N=42) • 2 redesign sections (N=99) • ULAs worked with Redesign Instructors via Independent Study • Full Implementation • Tripled capacity (N = 150) • Began ULA course • 2nd semester: Began Netbook Lab

  5. Pilot Comparisons *Significantly different; p = .005 (eta2 = .027), p = .000 (eta2 = .075)

  6. Results • Course drift eliminated • Standard course, syllabus, schedule, grading, etc.

  7. Impact on Student Learning Success in the course

  8. Pilot Results: 50 Question Common Comprehensive Final Exam* Mean Test Scores *Instructors blind to exam content • *A one-way ANOVA of section on final exam percentage grades was significant, F = 23.251, p = .000, eta2 = .090. Also significant with GPA as covariate: F = 29.192, p = .000, eta2 = .11.

  9. Pilot Results: 50 Question Common Comprehensive Final Exam

  10. Pilot Results: 50 Question Common Comprehensive Final Exam • Final exam scores positively correlated with average scores on Mastery Quizzes • r =.523, p = .000

  11. Pilot Redesign Issues & Implementation Solutions • Comprehensive final exam too much • 3 unit exams • Reduced overall coverage • “Deadline Disorder” • 5 different activities reduced to the 3 types that helped students • 2 weeks to complete • Students not ready for blended design • Required computer lab 1x/wk

  12. Full Implementation Results: 43 Common Questions (3 exams)* Mean Test Scores *Instructors blind to exam content • *A one-way ANOVA of section (3 total) on common question percentage was significant, F = 25.852, p = .000, eta2 = .825.

  13. Full Implementation Results: Pre vs. Post Prejudice Essay • Mode • Pre-Essay = 0 or 1 • Post-Essay = 0,1, 2, 3, 4 Mean Test Scores • *A one-way repeated measures ANOVA on essay grades was significant, F = 230.71, p = .000, eta2 = .420.

  14. Impact on Retention DWF rate

  15. DWF Rate • Previous average: 12.5% • 18% prior to pilot • Pilot Semester • Traditional sections: 4% • Redesign sections: 22% • Full Implementation - Fall • 12.8%

  16. Other Impact on Students ULAs

  17. ULA Benefits • “Field Experience” course for top students • Leadership in Psychology Certificate Program • Supplemental Instructor (SI) • Receive additional training based on national SI program • Interning as a ULA • Research experience included

  18. ULA Benefits • Future opportunities • Commencement Speaker • Spring 2010 & Fall 2010 speakers were ULAs • Graduate School • Teaching or Research Assistantship • Prestigious Internships • Most recent: Sloop Institute for Excellence in Leadership

  19. Impact on Cost Savings Formula rating Departmental implication

  20. Cost Savings • NCAT formula: $89 to $26 • Departmental implication: • 1 FT faculty position • Biggest cost effectiveness: • Tripling capacity in class • Staffing

  21. Cost Savings • Use of savings • Realized: • Communication Response System Implementation (“clickers”) • Netbook lab • Yearly support for Tamarin Colony • Support for Coordinator • Payment to lab assistants, SI, intern

More Related