1 / 9

APTLD Amman Meeting 2010

APTLD Amman Meeting 2010. Delegation, Redelegation and Retirement of ccTLD’s. ICANN ccNSO Working Group. Working Group created July 2009 32 members To investigate if a PDP is required for ccTLD: Delegations Redelegations Retirements Not to develop policies

lindabooker
Télécharger la présentation

APTLD Amman Meeting 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. APTLD Amman Meeting 2010 Delegation, Redelegation and Retirement of ccTLD’s

  2. ICANN ccNSO Working Group • Working Group created July 2009 • 32 members • To investigate if a PDP is required for ccTLD: • Delegations • Redelegations • Retirements • Not to develop policies • Meeting frequently, often weekly

  3. ICANN ccNSO Working Group • Probably the most critical ccNSO decision Noting: • Governments can no longer be un-interested in ccTLD operations • Assertion of Sovereign Rights • Please pay attention to reporting at Cartegena! • And make submissions!!!

  4. Research Phase • Reviewed existing “policies”: • RFC1591 (and earlier RFC’s) • ICP-1 • GAC Principles of 2000 and 2005 • Measured no significant differences between these policies • Reviewed all ICANN Board decisions on: • Delegations • Redelegations • Retirements

  5. Analysis Phase • Categorised all Board decisions as either: • Possibly Interesting • Interesting • Significantly Interesting • Around 800 pages of research results

  6. Research Report • 119 page “Potential Issues” report presented at ICANN Brussels • Highlights “significantly interesting” decisions made by interpretations of the underlying policies, or by decisions outside the policy framework for e.g. • Delegation of .eu • Retirement of .yu • “Un-delegation” of .um • Appointment of “caretaker” ccTLD Manager

  7. Current Tasks • Drafting final report for ICANN Cartegena: • Retirement section complete – recommending PDP • Delegation section complete – multi-choice • Redelegation section drafted in 2 parts: • Uncontested Redelegations • Contested Redelegations

  8. Current Issues • Does the ICANN Board have appropriate mandate? • What else would be appropriate? • What appeal mechanisms should exist? • What alternatives to a ccNSO PDP?

  9. Contact and Links Keith Davidson, Working Group Chair: keith@internetnz.net.nz WG Membership, Charter and links to all documents: http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/drdwg.htm Public consultation: “Potential Issues and their Classification” http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/drd-analysis-report-14jun10-en.pdf Progress Report from Brussels ICANN meeting http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/drd-progress-report-14jun10-en.pdf

More Related