1 / 23

‘ Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy’: Cultural- Hisrorical Activity Theory

‘ Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy’: Cultural- Hisrorical Activity Theory. Wollf-Micheal Roth University of Victoria Yew-Jin Lee National Institute of Education, Singapore. ‘ Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy’: Cultural- Hisrorical Activity Theory. Presented by: Fresenay Misker

lindsey
Télécharger la présentation

‘ Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy’: Cultural- Hisrorical Activity Theory

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ‘Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy’:Cultural-Hisrorical Activity Theory Wollf-Micheal Roth University of Victoria Yew-Jin Lee National Institute of Education, Singapore

  2. ‘Vygotsky’s Neglected Legacy’:Cultural-Hisrorical Activity Theory Presented by: FresenayMisker January 25, 2011

  3. What is in A CHAT? • What was wrong in the outlook of Educational Psychology regarding learning theory in Vygotisk’stime? • Is it addressed today?

  4. What is in A CHAT? • In his time Vygotisk’s thought educational Psychology was in a crises due to: • Functionalist model of thought analysis that is separation of intellect and affect. Model of autonomous thought process Isolated from: • The “fullness of life” • Personal need and interest • Inclination and impulses of the thinker

  5. What is in A CHAT? Vygotsk’sapproch to knowing and learning: • Knowing and learning in and out of school and across the life span (holistic approach)

  6. The case of Katherine (Direct Teaching) • 5th grade teacher in rural district • She thought these students previous grade • Some students have difficulty in English language and language of science • They like hands on activity • She is planning Introductory lesson on electrical circuits. • She feels the model lesson plan in teachers guide is ineffective if not a turn off

  7. The case of Katherine • She thought to give them lots of time to explore in small groups to set up the two circuit and learn concept current flow at the same time. But due to increased accountability by the school board • Opt for direct teaching by reasoning: • Economy of instructional time • Assurance of mastery learning • Higher achievement scores

  8. The case of Katherine • Some faces get gloomy • Katherine feels bad as well. • Why is Katherine feels bad? What is lacking? • What can help her situation?

  9. The case of Katherine • The contradiction arising from personal experience and professional sense of what is best with the generic statements about what to achieve and how to best attain it. • She lacks the theoretical tools to help her: • Learning an expansion of one’s possibilities is a by- product of the pursuit of motives and goals. • When children choose the motives of activity the also become emotionally involved.

  10. The case of Katherine • She also lacks the capacity… • Language or the utterance students make is a means to mediate the concrete realization of the goals the children's set for themselves during exploration tasks. She doesn’t have a holistic theory of practical activity consistent with her professional life. She doesn’t know she is a member of Historically situated educational community. Knowing this would have helped her greatly and boost her confidence.

  11. Contradiction observed(for discussion) • Theory-praxis gap. • Tension between epistemological and ontological aspects of human development. • The deference between decontextualized and embodied knowledge. • Apparent disjunction between individual learners and with other learners and their social environments.

  12. Learning by Participating in Legitimate Activity (Environmentalism CHAT Based Curriculum)

  13. Learning by Participating in Legitimate Activity • The teacher introduced the about the state of the their Creek and general understanding of the environment taken from local news paper. • Asked the students what can they do about it? I. Students motivated started brainstorming and came up with ideas such as: • Cleaning up documenting the litter. II. Exploratory field trip accompanied by:

  14. Learning by Participating in Legitimate Activity Parents Environmentalists Biologists Water technicians First Nation elders III. Every field trip every other week (whole afternoon) • students enjoy a relative freedom of design the problem and implementation.

  15. Learning by Participating in Legitimate Activity • Some collected specimens along the River and measured speed of water at the same time. • Some measured depth of the river and speed of the river. • Some collected specimens nearby area of the Creek • Some videotaped and accompanied it by narration.

  16. Learning by Participating in Legitimate Activity IV. School lessons were accompanied by: • Discussion • Analysing data collected in the field trip • One groups problem becomes common topic for the class mediated by the teacher. • V. Open-house event (organized by the environmentalists)

  17. Learning by Participating in Legitimate Activity • V. Open-house event (organized by the environmentalists) consists of: • School children's • Visitors • Parents • community • Activities:

  18. Learning by Participating in Legitimate Activity • Activities: • Students participate in explaining the environmental activity they partook to the visitors of the Open-house show. • They are showing their product distributing their learning and products back to the community.

  19. Learning by Participating in Legitimate Activity • VI. Credits: • Students were credited by the environmentalists for bringing everybody together for the show. • Local news paper documented their contribution to the society. • Also Web site documentation of their learning and acting were posted.

  20. summary (The CHAT approach) • Students chosen their activity. (generating knowledge and saving the Creek) Students chosen the means by which they want to represent it. • They enact on collectively defined activity in their municipality. (doing environmentalism) • Reintroduction of products back in to the community. (actions and learning's)

  21. summary(The CHAT approach) Where they become new social and material resources for furthering the learnings of others including: • environmentalists • Parents and children • Identities of children changed from school students to young citizens enacting concern for the environmental health of their community. VII. Special Case (Davie) ‘knowledge depends on settings not someone's inherent behaviour’.

  22. comparison Direct Teaching • Text book direct teaching • [Individual learning at the heart of it] • [Learning as simply an isolated phenomenon]. Learning by participating in Legitimate Activity(CHAT) • Collective provides opportunity for learning • Out come of the activity cannot be understood without mediating elements. (environmentalism as a whole and each action that contribute to it. • [Cooperative learning is at the heart of it].

  23. Thank you

More Related