1 / 19

GEM in the GEWEX Transferability Study

GEM in the GEWEX Transferability Study. Zav Kothavala, Colin Jones, Katja Winger, Bernard Dugas & Ayrton Zadra. Introduction.

linore
Télécharger la présentation

GEM in the GEWEX Transferability Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GEM in the GEWEX Transferability Study Zav Kothavala, Colin Jones, Katja Winger, Bernard Dugas & Ayrton Zadra

  2. Introduction To determine that Regional Climate Models can realistically simulate the climate variability in all regions of the globe, we want to develop parameterizations that are evaluated against observations in all possible climates. Regional atmospheric climate Models from different Continental Scale Experiments (CSE) were transferred from their “native domain” to other continents involved in the Inter-CSE Transferability Study (ICTS) - GEWEX project.

  3. The ICTS Regional Climate Modeling protocol aims to capitalise on the global coverage offered by CEOP observations to assess and improve the global transferability of RCMs Unmodified RCMs were run on a variety of domains around the globe

  4. Participating RCMs RCA3 Rossby Centre (Sweden) CLM GKSS Research Centre (Germany) RSM Scripps Institution of Oceanography (USA) RegCM3 Iowa State University (USA) GEM-LAM RPN Environment Canada (Canada) MRCC Ouranos-UQAM, Montréal (Canada)

  5. GEM-LAM characteristics • Coté et al., MWR (1998); version 3.2.1 • Hydrostatic primitive equations • Rotated grid on lat lon projection (0.5 degree horizontal resolution) • 53 hybrid vertical levels (top at ~10 hPa) • 30 minute timestep - period: 2000/01/01 – 2004/12/31 • Solar constant 1367 kw/Wm2 • Constant GHG concentrations • Deep convection (Kain-Fritsch) & shallow convection • Simple super-saturation based large-scale condensation • ISBA land-surface scheme • Boundary forcing every 6 hours with NCEP2 reanalyses

  6. Barrow, Alaska 71.3N 156.6E

  7. Simulations in Arctic climates (Barrow, Alaska)

  8. Barrow, Alaska: Radiation fluxes SW down SW up LW down LW up

  9. Barrow: Native domain freq. distribution (Surface temperature)

  10. Barrow: Native domain freq. distribution (Precipitation)

  11. Barrow: Native domain freq. distribution (wind speed)

  12. Barrow: Diurnal Cycle 2003-2004 (surface temperature)

  13. Manaus: Brazil - 2.61S 60.21W

  14. Non-native domain (Manaus: Brazil - 2.61S 60.21W)

  15. Manaus: frequency histograms (Surface temperature)

  16. Manaus: frequency histograms (Total daily precipitation)

  17. Manaus: Frequency distribution (wind speed)

  18. Simulations on non-native domain: Equatorial Island

  19. Summary • Goal is to evaluate how RCMs simulate the diurnal cycle of temperature, precipitation and the heat fluxes in non-native domains • In general the temperature and radiation fields are closer to the observations in native domains compared to non-native domains. Precipitation and fluxes differ from the observed in native and non-native doimains. • Ongoing analyses in collaboration with individiual modelling groups to ascertain reasons for variations and possible fixes.

More Related