1 / 13

Isobaric Analog Resonances

Isobaric Analog Resonances. TORUS Annual Meeting. June 25, 2012. Ian Thompson, LLNL. Isospin Dependence of the nucleon-nucleus Optical Potential. Usual formulation of the optical potential: where t z =1/2 for neutrons, -1/2 for protons

linus
Télécharger la présentation

Isobaric Analog Resonances

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Isobaric Analog Resonances TORUS Annual Meeting • June 25, 2012 • Ian Thompson, LLNL

  2. Isospin Dependence of the nucleon-nucleus Optical Potential • Usual formulation of the optical potential: where tz=1/2 for neutrons, -1/2 for protons • N and Z are neutron and proton numbers in the target, A=N+Z, • V0 ≈ −52 MeV at center is negative, and V1≈ 26 MeV is positive: • (neutrons attract protons more than they do other neutrons) • Define targetisospin operator Tz = ½(N-Z), so

  3. Lane Equations for (p,n) reactions • Generalize to the full tensor product • This has off-diagonal terms: • Couples together the neutron and proton channels • Get direct (n,p) and (p,n) cross sections: eg. • Fermi transitions in which initial and final orbits are the same • eg. DeVito, Khoa, Austin, et al: arXiv:1202.2660v1. Coupled equations! where and Q = energy released in (p,n) = − Coulomb displacement energy

  4. Isobaric Analog RESONANCES Consider 208Pb(p,n)208Bi reaction at low energies • Here, Coulomb energies give Q=−18.9 MeV • Neutron has much less energy than proton • Neutron may be trapped below threshold • If near unoccupied bound state, gives resonance: The Isobaric Analog Resonance

  5. Isobaric Analog RESONANCES (2) Neutron single-particle levels around 208Pb Bn=7.347 MeV Can see resonances when the neutron energy is near a bound state. EnF = Ep + Q + Bn where Bn=7.347 MeV and Q = −18.9 MeV

  6. Measuring IARs: (p,p′γ) ← ← .. ← • The IAR ‘decay’ to the elastic channel gives resonance phase shifts • This is the trapped neutron charge-exchanging back to the elastic proton • But it is difficult to measure proton phase shifts accurately at the required energies (14−18 MeV) • Can the IAR decay by other channels? • Yes: OTHER neutrons could change to protons! • As long as they are in spatial orbital NOT occupied by protons • All of the neutrons in the orbitals 1h9/2 to 3p1/2 are thus allowed to charge-exchange back to continuum protons! • This leaves nucleus with a weakly bound neutron (eg 4s1/2) and a hole at or below the Fermi level (eg 3p1/2): a particle-hole inelastic excitation • Proton has energy reduced by the particle−hole energy difference: inelastic p’ • The ph state will eventually gamma-decay. • Experimentally: measure inelastic protons and gamma decays in coincidence

  7. Measured IAR (p,p′γ) coincidences Left: Resonance at 17 MeV Nearest to 4s1/2 IAR Decays at 5.292 MeV ≈ E(4s1/2) – E(3p1/2) Right: Resonance at 17.5 MeV Nearest to 2g7/2 or3d3/2 IAR Decays at 5.948 MeV ≈ E(2g7/2) – E(3p1/2)

  8. Other contributions to (p,p′γ) • The (p,p′γ) reaction to the (4s1/2)(3p1/2)−1 particle-hole state can also be modeled as: • 208Pb3p1/2(p,p’)208Pb4s1/2 inelastic n* excitation • 208Pb3p1/2+p → d+207Pb 1/2- → p’+208Pb4s1/2 two-step transfer reaction via a deuteron • These are easily modeled in FRESCO • Form a non-resonant background to IAR decay • Note: amplitudes interfere coherently

  9. Coupled channels treatment of charge-exchange (p,p′γ) in FRESCO • Fresco expands in two-body partitions. Here, 4: • p + 208Pbgs KEp=17 MeV n in 3p1/2 in 208Pbgs • p’ + 208Pbph KEp=12 MeV n in 4s1/2 on 207Pb • n + 208Bi KEn=−2 MeV n in 4s1/2 as projectile • d + 207Pb KEd=12 MeV n in deuteron • See the partitions 2. and 3. are NOT orthogonal! • Defined new overlap form in FRESCOfor such non-orthogonal bases

  10. Calculated (p,p′γ) to (4s1/2) (3p1/2)−1inelastic state in 208Pb* Inelastic cross section from overlap of neutron quasi-boundstate (#3) and neutron inelastic state (#2). This calculation used real proton potentials, and a complex deuteron potential

  11. Unresolved issues • This work is a ‘valence nucleon’ account of IAR. • In the longer-term, full structure-model calculations of widths would be good. • Verification of absolute magnitudes for all peaks. • Choosing the correct energy-averaging interval • IARs are too narrow for optical-model averaging! • Thus need (p,p′γ) coincidences to see IARs among the compound-nucleus decays • Effects of energy-dependent optical potentials • Eg. for transitions from 20 MeV to sub-threshold!

  12. Conclusions • IAR reactions probe neutron bound states with proton reactions • Should be useful for unstable isotopes! • But: • need (p,p′γ) coincidences to see IAR among all the compound-nucleus decays

More Related