1 / 22

Background

California Ambient Dioxin Air Monitoring Program (CADAMP) Kathy Gill Air Resources Board Monitoring and Laboratory Division California Environmental Protection Agency April 19, 2005. Background. Program initiated in 2000 - funding for two years of ambient monitoring

lita
Télécharger la présentation

Background

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. California Ambient Dioxin Air Monitoring Program (CADAMP)Kathy GillAir Resources BoardMonitoring and Laboratory DivisionCalifornia Environmental Protection AgencyApril 19, 2005

  2. Background • Program initiated in 2000 - funding for two years of ambient monitoring • Sampling began in December 2001 with 10 sites. • Sampling conducted by BAAQMD, SCAQMD and ARB staff • Monitoring for dioxins/furans, dioxin-like PCBs, and PBDEs (flame retardants) • Data will be used to help understand dioxin levels in ambient air and prioritize risk management strategies

  3. U.S. EPA Site Locations • U.S. EPA established a national dioxin air monitoring network (NDAMN) to estimate rural ambient air concentrations of dioxins/furans and PCBs throughout the U.S. Operated from 1998 through 2002 with up to 30 sites. • CADAMP design similar to NDAMN (1/28 days vs. 1/3 months) • NDAMN sites in California located in: - Bay Area (Fort Cronkhite, San Francisco) - Central Valley (Rancho Seco Park)

  4. Sampling • Based on U.S. EPA Method TO-9A • PS-1 type high volume sampler • normally used for 24-hour samples • Each sample • 1 PUF/XAD/PUF sandwich in glass cartridge • 4 Quartz Fiber Filters (QFF) • CADAMP extended sampling periods of 28 days • Four sub-periods (5-6 days on, 1-2 days off) • QFF changed each week to prevent overloading and maintain flow rate • PUF/XAD/PUF remains in place for all 28 days

  5. Sampling Head Chart Recorder Magnehelic Gauge Timer and Flow Controller

  6. Benefits of Long Duration/Large Volume Sampling Collecting 6000 - 8000 L of air • Provides low detection limits (~0.2 fg/m3 for 2,3,7,8-TCDD) • Minimizes the non-detects • Provides comprehensive temporal coverage (representativeness) • Minimizes number of samples collected • Reduces lab costs

  7. 2,3,7,8 -TCDD 2,3,7,8-TCDF 2,2’,4,4’,6-Pentabromodiphenyl Ether 3,3’,4,4’-TeCB Analysis • U.S. EPA Established Procedures • Method TO-9A/1613A for 17 dioxins/furans • Method 1668A for 14 PCBs • Draft Method 1614 for 44 PBDEs • Single sample; extract split 3 ways • Dioxin/Furans • PCBs and PBDEs • Archive portion

  8. Valid Results Extensive field and laboratory validation criteria applied to data • 2002 • 101 valid samples (84% completeness) • 21 valid field blanks (88% completeness) • 2003 • 145 valid samples (93% completeness) • 25 valid field blanks (96% completeness)

  9. Toxicity Equivalence Factors (TEFs) • Concentrations for dioxins expressed as toxicity equivalence (TEQ) • TEFs are numerical factors that express toxicity of each dioxin, furan or PCB relative to the toxicity of 2,3,7,8-TCDD • 1997 WHO TEFs • Adopted by California in 2003 - replaced the I-TEFs • Used in NDAMN, making data comparisons between the two networks possible

  10. Concentration Results • Lab results • reported as picograms/sample • (pg = 10-12) • Calculate air concentration • femtograms/cubic meter • (fg = 10-15) • Convert to Toxicity Equivalence • fg TEQ/cubic meter

  11. 2002/2003 QC • Collocated Samples • Average Field Blank Concentrations • 0.48 fg TEQ/m3 for D/F • 0.04 fg TEQ/m3 for PCBs

  12. San Francisco Bay Area Sampling Period TEQ Averages2002 2003 Includes all valid samples for each sampling period

  13. South Coast Area Sampling Period TEQ Averages2002 2003 Includes all valid samples for each sampling period

  14. CADAMP Averages • PCB contribution to Total TEQ was up to 50%

  15. Comparison of CADAMP Results • Key Factors to Consider in Comparing Data to Other Studies • TEFs (which scheme used?) • Detection limits (DL) • factored as DL, 1/2 DL or zero for TEQ calculation • if elevated (due to volume collected or analytical technique) can impact TEQ • Blank corrections • Short vs. long duration sampling • CADAMP annual averages vs. few data points • Remote - rural - urban - source impacted?

  16. 2004/2005 Monitoring • 2004 continued as 2003 with 10 sites and 2 collocated samplers • 2005 - Retained one Bay Area site (Livermore) and one South Coast site (Rubidoux) • Installed sampler in San Joaquin Valley at Fresno in January 2005 • Will add rural San Joaquin Valley site to conduct high population urban vs. rural comparison and obtain rural PBDE data • Continue for 13 sampling moments

  17. ARB Web Pageswww.arb.ca.gov/aaqm/qmosopas/dioxins/dioxins.htm • Web pages contain: • Maps and site histories • QAPP, FOP, methods, sampling schedules • Individual congener concentrations and TEQ for both D/F and PCB at each site • Quarterly and annual averages for each site • Regional and statewide averages • Downloadable data - Excel format • 2003 PBDE and all 2004 data expected to be released and on web in near future

  18. ARB Dioxin Web Site www.arb.ca.gov/aaqm/qmosopas/dioxins/dioxins.htm

More Related