1 / 19

ASAS

ASAS TN Workshop. April 2003. Presented by Thomas Fixy Manager Air Traffic Information Management. ASAS. Dream or reality?. ASAS : w hat and why?. A set of applications based on the real time use of broadcasted traffic data (ADS-B)

liuz
Télécharger la présentation

ASAS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ASAS TN Workshop April 2003 Presented by Thomas Fixy Manager Air Traffic Information Management ASAS Dream or reality?

  2. ASAS : what and why? • A set of applications based on the real time use of broadcasted traffic data (ADS-B) • Objective : to enhance flight and ground operations (safety, efficiency, etc) • ASASPackage 1 : presently 12 applications for Situation Awareness and Spacing • 5 applications for ground surveillance (GSA) • 7 applications for airborne applications (ASA)

  3. How? A variety of activities... • The US • SF21 Capstone Alaska (UAT) • CAA Situation awareness CDTI • Not useful for continental radar areas • RTCA MASPS & MOPS. However FAA agreed to joint US/EU work. • ... • Europe • ASAS Trials based on VDL4 • Propose to lead RFG for applications harmonisation • ... • Asia Pacific region • Australian trials for Radar Like Application (separation) • 1090 ADS-B out mandate proposed by Australia for 2006 • ...

  4. Transition • Short term • ADS-B out 1090 Extended Squitters • Cooperate with all stakeholders (Eurocontrol, FAA, airlines, ATS providers) for harmonised applications definition & procedure agreement, interoperability, OSED, safety performance requirements : RFG • Medium term • ATSAW Situation awareness using CDTI • Medium/long term • Manual spacing with minimum automation (guidance cues, etc) • Automatic spacing & rest of Package 1 • Add Nav (RNP) & Com (CPDLC) for global concept of operation

  5. Long Term : Automatic Spacing and P1 • System impact : • Transponder (ADS-B out update) • Traffic computer (surveillance function i.e. fusion, alerting, filtering) • Traffic Display on Navigation Display • MCDU, specific pointing device, ... • ATSU (ASAS automatic exchanges) • Spacing algorithms (FMS) • Guidance control loop (FMS + autopilot) • Procedures & training for ground and onboard

  6. ASAS P1 architecture on Airbus MMR MMR New wiring for ADS-B IN Integrated Traffic Computer Mode S + 1090 XT ADS-B media Mode S 1090 xt ADIRS ADIRS GPS/IRS/GPIRS data ADIRS Selected altitude FCU FMS nav data ATC TCAS Ctl Panel own data Pointing Device GPS/IRS/GPIRS data FMS FMS ASAS Navigation Processing ATSU MCDU LS MCDU Traffic Computer: - 1090RTADS-B media - ASASTraffic data processing - ACASRT & processing - L band Second link capability A.P. A.P. other ADS-B media if requested Display Nav Display DMC Display Navigation Processing Surveillance Processing

  7. Medium/Long term : Manual spacing • System impact : • Transponder (ADS-B out update) • Traffic computer • Traffic Display on Navigation Display • MCDU, specific pointing device, ... • Spacing algorithm (FMS) for manual guidance (flight director) • Procedures & training for ground and onboard

  8. Medium term : ATSAW • System impact : • Traffic computer (ADS-B out/in) • Traffic Display on Navigation Display • MCDU, specific pointing device, ... - optional • Pilot’s need for better awareness of traffic situation is legitimate • especially if traffic increases • benefit : safety and crew education + voice com reduction • ATSAW is an unavoidable (first?) step • ATSAW can provide REAL benefit now • i.e. self-separation in non radar airspace (e.g.Capstone Alaska)

  9. Short term : ADS-B OUT • System impact : • Transponder (ADS-B out update) • ADS-B out can provide REAL benefit now • i.e. separation in non radar airspace (e.g. Australia)

  10. ADS-B Out architecture on Airbus MMR MMR Existing wiring New Wiring Prov for ELS/EHS/1090ES GPS data for MK4 XPDR Mode S + 1090 XT ADS-B media Mode S 1090 xt ADIRS ADC ADIRS ADIRS GPS/IRS/GPIRS data Selected altitude FCU Flight number ATC TCAS Ctl Panel GPS/IRS/GPIRS data FMS FMS LS TCAS Display Nav Display DMC Display

  11. How to start?

  12. Start small • ASAS before 10 years is a DREAM • Airline financial situation, maturation time, deployment (retrofit), standardization process, certification, etc • 1090 : Use existing aircraft installation : Avoid costly modification initially (i.e. FMS). • VDL4 • requires installation of additional new radios for surveillance, additional antennas and location (wiring), requires 6-12MHz guard bands to mitigate interference with essential VHF voice radios • these characteristics make VDL 4 costly to install, and inefficient of spectrum use • L-Band more adapted to aircraft system integration (AEEC Integrated Surveillance System supported by Airbus and Boeing, A380 AESS, etc)

  13. States to mandate ADS-B out • For efficient ASAS, all aircraft must be equipped • except maybe for some specific operations (spacing at HUBs? Night operations?) • If all a/c manufacturers are not committed, ASAS is a DREAM • ADS-B Out is a pre-requisite to all Package 1 applications • ADS-B Out is a REALITY today • Mandate ADS-B Out will accelerate the development & deployment process • Based on DO260A and on existing aircraft installation as first step

  14. Reality: time-to-market life cycle • Operational Concept Validation : 5-7y • Concept definition, feasibility and acceptability • Standardisation (OSED), regional harmonisation • Safety case – global • Benefit assessment • Implementation planning • Industrialisation : 5-7y • Standardisation (Safety, performance, interoperability) • Technological development • Includes systems development, validation and large scale pre-implementation trials, certification process. • Usual development cycle: air and ground harmonisation • Multiple developments for Forward-Fit/ Retro-Fit • Deployment : 3-5y • In both air and ground “fleets” • Voluntary or mandated deployment

  15. Industrial capaciity Decision for ADS-B out  MANDATE with EHS mandate Package 1 implementation 2003 2005 2009 2012 2015 • Mode S ELS/EHS • 1090 Long Squitters • Minimal ADS-B out Certif Certif Mode S update for ADS-B out ADS-B in & CDTI - ATSAW Package 1 Spacing implementation & Applications certification ADS-B in & CDTI certif - Spacing TBC (FMS?) FMS Modified for automation TIS-B Ground Stations FP6 research projects Second link development if needed

  16. ASAS Standards • Urgent need for harmonised definition and need • Airbus needs a unique definition • Regional solutions, maybe inevitable, but are a burden • Guaranteeing world-wide interoperability • Clear need still lacking from stakeholders (Airlines/ATSP) • except Australia & Alaska : Radar Like (ADS-B out) & ATSAW (CDTI) • RFG : harmonised OSED • Today scarce ATSP/Airlines resources to work on OSED!!!! • caution : only DLH & EEC Bretigny, representing Airlines/ATC community • Eurocontrol, FAA, and European ATSP’s have a crucial role • Risk : OSED/SPR/Interop remain a dream • the reality : RTCA MASPs/MOPS

  17. Crucial : Human factors & training • What to present to pilot? What not to present? What range? Which display? How to merge TCAS info with ASAS info? How to process conflict? Procedures? Etc… • This is being worked in research programs, TIM ASAS, etc. • Human Factor validation of the proposed solutions needed • All these aspects must be addressed if we think to transfer tasks or responsibility from controller to pilot. • We are still far. • Important impact on pilot repartition task, then procedures. • Specific qualification (such as cat 3) with recurrent training? Managed at Airline level has important impacts • Today training for CPDLC is an issue for airlines

  18. Conclusion • ASAS is only a tool • ASAS must be integrated in a global concept of operations that will maximize its benefit • Start with pre-requisite: mandate ADS-B Out • The paradigm change will come from the operational use (procedures, ATC/pilot task repartition, etc) and the way ASAS will be integrated into a global concept : Single European Sky (OSED) • Take into account industry capacity • Define the need and ensure harmonisation • Start with simple applications • Ground applications • Airborne applications with minimum system impact • Carry on R&D!

  19. AN EADS JOINT COMPANY WITH BAE SYSTEMS This document and all information contained herein is the sole property of AIRBUS S.A.S. No intellectual property rights are granted by the delivery of this document or the disclosure of its content. This document shall not be reproduced or disclosed to a third party without the express written consent of AIRBUS S.A.S. This document and its content shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied. The statements made herein do not constitute an offer. They are based on the mentioned assumptions and are expressed in good faith. Where the supporting grounds for these statements are not shown, AIRBUS S.A.S. will be pleased to explain the basis thereof.

More Related