html5-img
1 / 20

Sogeti : Promotional Activities 2015-2016

Sogeti : Promotional Activities 2015-2016. Fernando Morente , Tereza Wennerholm , Geoffroy Fisher, David Steffes, and Lucia Alexandroae Sogeti Luxembourg. Working Group "European Statistical Data Support" 21 & 22 April 2016. PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES. OBJECTIVES.

ljoiner
Télécharger la présentation

Sogeti : Promotional Activities 2015-2016

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sogeti: Promotional Activities 2015-2016 Fernando Morente, Tereza Wennerholm, Geoffroy Fisher, David Steffes, and Lucia Alexandroae Sogeti Luxembourg Working Group "European Statistical Data Support" 21 & 22 April 2016

  2. PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES

  3. OBJECTIVES Increase the visibility of Eurostat’s data and related services Increase users’ knowledge in Eurostat data

  4. Type of Promotional Activities Half-day presentations

  5. TOOLS: TRAININGS & PRESENTAION • Power point presentations • Hands-on workshops • Customized workshops

  6. HOW DO WE SELECT THE TARGET GROUP • Pre-selection of top universities in the chosen countries • Selection of the frequent users contacting the User Support • Other connections

  7. WE PREPARE AN OFFER • We try to target… • customize • Be flexible

  8. UNIVERSITIES • KEA. Copenhagen, Danemark. (May 2016) • University of Copenhagen, Danemark (May 2015) • University of Granada, Spain (November 2015) • University College London, UK (February 2016) • University of Manchester, UK October 2015

  9. Other institutions • The Danish Parliament, Copenhagen, DK (October 2015) • FGTB, Brussels, Belgium (March 2016) • FEB, Brussels, Belgium (May 2016) • Royal Statistical Society, UK (october 2016) • EMRA, Dublin, Ireland (March 2016) • IHK,Berlin, Germany (June 2015) • Chamber of Commerce, Vienna, Austria (September 2015)

  10. Companies • CEG, Santiago de Compostela, Spain (April 2016) • STEF, Paris, France (April 2016)

  11. Public administration Research institute • Nordregio, Stockholm, Sweden (February 2016) Government agency • Boverket, Karlskrona, Sweden (March 2016)

  12. QUALITY MEASUREMENT

  13. QUALITY MEASUREMENT • The practical exercises • Evaluation forms • Compliments and general feedback from participants • Multiplier effect

  14. Participants’ evaluation2015-2016

  15. Participants appreciate

  16. Participants expect

  17. Impact on the User Support • Increasingnumber of e-mails received directly • Increasing number of calls/requests after each training course • Mulitiplier effect • Users came back with the request of organising the training for their own university/institute

  18. Fernando, Geoffroy, Lucia, David and Tereza Thank you for your attention!

More Related