International Business Entry Strategies: Cultures and Foreign Investment
Explore the intricate relationship between culture and foreign direct investment. Learn about Hofstede's four cultural dimensions, the main foreign entry modes, and factors influencing the choice between them.
International Business Entry Strategies: Cultures and Foreign Investment
E N D
Presentation Transcript
International Business(Entry Strategy – Foreign Direct Investment)Erasmus programmeIILecturer Dr Pavlos Dimitratos pdimitr@aueb.gr
Cultural differences • Culture is of paramount importance to internationalization • The relationship between culture and country can be ambiguous due to possible existence of subcultures • Social systems and values differ between countries also (e.g. the individual vs. the group) • Social strata, social mobility and class consciousness can considerably differ between countries (e.g. USA vs. India)
Cultural differences (cont’d) • Religion affects ethical standards and beliefs towards consumption, business and entrepreneurship in any country • E.g. the protestant work ethic supports the fundamental beliefs of capitalism • Islam is mainly concerned with social justice and is critical of those who earn profit through the exploitation of others
Cultural differences (cont’d) • Spoken and unspoken language are also part of culture • E.g. different interpretations of the word ‘liberal’ • Gestures, symbols and colors around the world
Cultural differences (cont’d) • Culture in the workplace • Hofstede’s four dimensions • Power distance: how a society deals with the fact that people are equal in physical and intellectual capabilities (e.g. Denmark vs. India) • Individualism vs. collectivism: focuses on the relationship between the individual and his/her fellows (e.g. USA vs. Thailand)
Cultural differences (cont’d) Hofstede’s four dimensions (cont’d): • Uncertainty avoidance: the degree to which different cultures socialize their members into accepting ambiguous situations and tolerating uncertainty (e.g. Japan vs. Great Britain) • Masculinity vs. feminity: deals with the relationship between gender and work roles (e.g. Netherlands vs. Mexico)
Two main foreign entry modes • Exports (trade) • Foreign direct investment (FDI) • FDI occurs when a firm invests directly in value-added activities in a foreign country • Once a firm engages in FDI, it becomes a multinational (MNE) • Foreign portfolio investment is investment in foreign financial instruments whereby no significant equity stake in a foreign business entity takes place
Two main foreign entry modes (con’d) • Licensing (franchising) represents a hybrid between exports and FDI • In licensing we have the exporting of intangibles • FDI can be joint ventures (strategic alliances) or wholly owned subsidiaries • FDI can occur through mergers/acquisitions or greenfield investments
Choice between entry modes… • Depends on… • Transportation costs (may dictate the use of FDI) • Market imperfections • Impediments to exporting (tariffs and other trade barriers) • Impediments to the sale of know-how stemming from the firm’s technological, marketing or management know-how. In those cases, the firm will prefer FDI to protect its valuable know-how and/or exert tight control in its foreign activities and/or because of no amenability to licensing • Most useful theory in explaining choice of entry modes
Choice between entry modes… (cont’d) • Depends on… • Following competitors (Knickerbocker) • The evolution of the international product life cycle (Vernon) • The stage of the firm’s international growth (Johanson and Vahlne) • The higher the experience/knowledge the firm acquires abroad, the more likely an FDI mode is • Location-specific advantages (Dunning) • Fit of firm’s resources with foreign country’s advantages • This viewpoint helps explain the direction of FDI
Exporting • Advantages • Low costs • May help a firm achieve experience curve and location economies • Disadvantages • Lack of control • Lack of involvement in the foreign market
Licensing (franchising) • Advantages • No development costs and risks associated with opening a foreign market • Disadvantages • Limited control over value-added activities required for realizing experience curve and location economies • The firm cannot efficiently coordinate strategic moves across countries • Risk associated with licensing know-how
Joint venture (strategic alliance) • Advantages • Benefit from a local partner’s knowledge • Share the development costs and risks of opening a foreign market • Politically acceptable • Disadvantages • Give control over critical competencies to foreign partners • No tight control compared with subsidiaries (lack of global strategic coordination) • May be hard to manage over time
Wholly owned subsidiaries • Advantages • Control and protection of valuable core competencies • Ability to engage in international strategic coordination, and realize location and experience economies • Disadvantages • High cost • Exposure to high risk • Mini-case discussion
FDI • Majority of FDI takes place through Mergers & Acquisitions rather than Greenfield investments - why? • M&A are quicker to execute • M&A may preempt competitors • In M&A firms acquire valuable strategic assets • Internationalized firms believe they can increase the efficiency of the acquired unit and thus may be less risky
FDI (cont’d) • Yet, M&A may fail because • Firms may overpay for the assets of the acquired firm • There can be a clash of cultures between the two firms • Of difficulties in the management of relationship • Of inadequate pre-acquisition screening
Other entry decisions • Which markets/countries to enter (Erasmus programme I) • Timing of entry (first mover vs. late mover) • Scale of entry / strategic commitments
The political economy of FDI • FDI has been viewed in a continuum ranging from an instrument of imperialist domination to an instrument for allocating production to most efficient locations. • Somewhere in the middle lies the view of the ‘pragmatic nationalism’ whereby FDI is viewed as having both benefits and costs (e.g. France in the 1980s) • Mini-case discussion
Benefits of FDI to the host country • Resource transfer effects (capital, technology, management) • Employment effects (direct and indirect) • Balance of payments effects (initial investment, substitution of imports, exports to other countries) • Effect on competition and economic growth
Costs of FDI to the host country • Adverse effects on competition (could monopolize the market) • Adverse effects on balance of payments (repatriation of earnings, imports from home/abroad) • Threat to national sovereignty and autonomy
Benefits of FDI to the home country • Effects on balance of payments (repatriation of earnings, exports from home) • Employment effects (demand for home-country goods) • Learning of valuable skills from foreign market exposure • Economic diplomacy
Costs of FDI to the home country • Effects on balance of payments • Employment effects • Home/ host countries can encourage or discourage FDI through a variety of policies • The WTO (World Trade Organization) has also become involved in regulations governing FDI
Readings • Hill, chapters 3, 6, 7 & 14 Recommended: • Johanson J., and Vahlne J.-E. (1977), “The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments”, Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32. • Root F.R. (1987), Entry Strategies for International Markets, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. • Young S., Hamill J., Wheeler C., and Davies J.R. (1989), International Market Entry and Development, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.