1 / 25

Relational Cloud: A Database as a Service for the Cloud

Relational Cloud: A Database as a Service for the Cloud. What we will be discussing today related to relational cloud? 1)Efficient multi tenancy. 2)Scalability 3)Privacy Why cloud computing?. Why cloud?. Attractive for 3 reasons: 1)Lower Hardware and energy costs

lobo
Télécharger la présentation

Relational Cloud: A Database as a Service for the Cloud

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Relational Cloud: A Database as a Service for the Cloud What we will be discussing today related to relational cloud? 1)Efficient multi tenancy. 2)Scalability 3)Privacy Why cloud computing?

  2. Why cloud? • Attractive for 3 reasons: 1)Lower Hardware and energy costs 2)The cost incurred proportional to actual usage-Both to software licensing and administration tools. 3)provides a better(upto 100% utilization) of hardware resources.

  3. Classical Database Architecture Donald Kossmann,Tim Kraska,Simon Loesing:An Evaluation of Alternative Architectures for Transaction Processing in the Cloud.

  4. Distributed System Architecture

  5. Distributed Databases • Database is logically partitioned into each partition and that controlled by a separate database server. • Partitioning, however, has scalability limitations with regard to dealing with a fluctuating workload. • To achieve better scalability and fault tolerance, partitioning +replication.

  6. key technical features of Relational Cloud • A workload-aware approach to multi-tenancy that identifies the workloads • The use of a graph-based data partitioning algorithm to achieve scalability. • An adjustable security scheme that enables SQL queries to run over encrypted data

  7. Efficient multi-tenancy • Multitenancy :a single instance of the software runs on a server, serving multiple client (tenants). • VM approach: pack each individual DB instance into a VM and multiple VMs on a single physical machine • Disadvantage. • Paper uses a single database server on each machine, which hosts multiple logical databases.

  8. Elastic scalability • Whenever a resource is overloaded what will you do? • support scale-out • Data is partitioned amongst multiple nodes to achieve higher throughput. • Workload-aware partitioner uses graph portioning

  9. System Design

  10. System Design • Partition each database into one or more nodes, when the load on a database exceeds the capacity of a single machine. • Place the database partitions on the back-end machines .load the Database ,migrate and replicate the data for availability. • secure the data and process the queries.

  11. Data Partitioning • Two purposes: • to scale a single database to multiple nodes • to enable more granular placement. • Relational Cloud uses a workload-aware partitioning strategy.

  12. Schism • a novel graph-based, datadriven partitioning system for transactional workloads. • a database and its workload using a graph, where tuples nodes and transactions  edges connecting the tuples • Partitioning the graphminimum-cut partitioning of the graph into k partitions.

  13. Graph Representation Schism: A Workload Driven Approach to Database Replication and Partitioning.

  14. Partitioning and replication • Example: consider the tuple (1, carlo, 80k) from Figure. This tuple  3 transactions and is therefore represented by 4 nodes. • This cost is the number of transactions that update the tuple in the workload (2) 

  15. PLACEMENT AND MIGRATION • Resource allocation is a major challenge Problems include: • monitoring the resource requirements of each workload, predicting the load multiple workloads will generate when run together on a server. • Solution: kairos(monitoring and consolidation engine )

  16. PRIVACY • secrecy of data in an SQL database • This paper presents CryptDB, provides provable privacy guarantees without having to trust the DBMS server or the DBAs who maintain and tune the DBMS

  17. CryptDB • data in an encrypted format, and execute SQL queries over encrypted data without having access to the decryption keys. • adjustable query-based encryption in an onion of encryptions, from weaker forms of encryption to stronger forms of encryption that reveal no information

  18. Adjustable query-based encryption • Start out the database with the most secure encryption scheme • Adjust encryption dynamically • Strip off levels of the onions:

  19. Onions of encryptions RND DET RND SEARCH OPE JOIN OPE-JOIN HOM Any value Any value int value Onion 1 Onion 2 Onion 3 CryptDB: A Practical Encrypted Relational DBMS

  20. Different Techniques • randomized encryption (RND)-> maximum security • deterministic encryption (DET)->weaker privacy, however allows server to check for equality • order-preserving encryption (OPE)->even more relaxed in that it enables inequality checks and sorting operations • homomorphic encryption (HOM)->enables operations over encrypted data such as additions,etc.

  21. Implementation SQL Interface Server • No change to the DBMS • Should work on most SQL DBMS CryptDB PK tables Unmodified DBMS Query Encrypted Query Frontend CryptDB UDFs (user-defined functions) Encrypted Results Results

  22. Example RND DET DET emp: SELECT * FROM emp WHERE salary = 100000 SEARCH rank name salary JOIN Any value UPDATE table1 SET col3onion1 = DecryptRND(key, col3onion1) SELECT * FROM table1 WHERE col3onion1 = x5a8c34

  23. Current progress • various components of Relational Cloud and are in the process of integrating them into a single coherent system, prior to offering it as a service on a public cloud. • implemented the distributed transaction coordinator along with the routing, partitioning, replication, and CryptDB components • developed a placement and migration engine that monitors database server statistics, OS statistics, and hardware loads, and uses historic statistics to predict the combined load placed by multiple workloads.

  24. Conclusions • Provided an efficient multi-tenancy system ,a graph-based partitioning method to spread large databases across many machines. For privacy, we developed the notion of adjustable privacy. • Demonstrating an integrated prototype at CIDR 2011.

More Related