1 / 4

Building Community: Addressing Normative Challenges in NorMAS

Join the NorMAS community for a series of fruitful discussions aimed at enhancing communal dynamics. We introduce a new format that blends presentations with discussions, fostering robust dialogues. Together, we will explore ten key challenges that agents face in recognizing, creating, and communicating norms while preserving autonomy. Key discussion topics will include the identification of normative gaps and conflicts, and the importance of conviviality. Dive into our Wiki to analyze and map current challenges, ensuring no issue is left unaddressed.

london
Télécharger la présentation

Building Community: Addressing Normative Challenges in NorMAS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NorMAS community • Continuation of community building by: • Many fruitful discussions • New form: presentation + discussant + reply and discussion • Discussion groups • Community means not part of a sect • Down with the 10 commandments! • Down with the guru’s! • Let’s be convivial!

  2. Ten challenges for NorMAS (says who?) Ten challenges – tools for: • agents supporting communities in their task of recognizing, creating, and communicating norms to agents. • agents to simplify normative systems, recognize when norms have become redundant, and to remove norms. • agents to enforce norms. • agents to preserve their autonomy. • agents to construct organizations. • agents to create intermediate concepts and normative ontology, for example to decide about normative gaps. • agents to decide about norm conflicts. • agents to voluntarily give up some norm autonomy by allowing automated norm processing in agent acting and decision making • conviviality. • legal responsibility of the agents and their principals.

  3. Discussion “topics” • Tuesday • Have a look at our Wiki and cluster the issues mentioned. • Map them on the 10 challenges. • Are there any challenges not addressed? Issues not addressing one of the challenges? Any challenges missing? How about challenges that are not related to tools? ….. • Wednesday • Take the papers of this years NorMAS. • Map them on the 10 challenges. • Are there any challenges not addressed? Issues not addressing one of the challenges? Any challenges missing? How about challenges that are not related to tools? …. • Thursday • presentation of discussion results

  4. Group 1 Thomas Agotnes Giulia Andrighetto Guillaume Aucher Tina Balke Patrizio Barbini Guido Boella Olivier Boissier Jan M. Broersen Brigitte Burgemeestre Patrice Caire Jose Carmo Group 2 Cristiano Castelfranchi Laurence Cholvy Mehdi Dastani Roberta Ferrario Nicoletta Fornara Dov M. Gabbay Valerio Genovese Guido Governatori Davide Grossi Takashi Hashimoto Joris Hulstijn Group 3 Magnus Johansson Sindhu Joseph Emiliano Lorini Qin Ma Sanjay Modgil Matthias Nickles Pablo Noriega Timothy Norman Xavier Parent Celia Costa Pereira Group 4 Gabriella Pigozzi Henry Prakken Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu Yao-Hua Tan Ingo Timm Viviane Torres da Silva Luca Tummolini Wamberto Vasconcelos Harko Verhagen Serena Villata Leon van der Torre Discussion groups

More Related