1 / 27

Particle production at RHIC

This study explores the freeze-out and production properties of particles in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC, providing insights into the QCD phase diagram and the hadronization process. The analysis technique involves studying the freeze-out temperatures, kinetic properties, chemical properties, baryon/meson production, and strangeness production. The results show scaling properties and provide information on the system size dependence of freeze-out parameters.

lreed
Télécharger la présentation

Particle production at RHIC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Particle production at RHIC Aneta Iordanova for the STAR collaboration

  2. Outline • Motivation • Analysis Technique • Freeze-out • Chemical • Kinetic • Baryon/meson and strangeness production • Scaling properties Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  3. Motivation Identified particle spectra in heavy-ion collisions at different center-of-mass energies and system size provide: a unique tool to explore the QCD phase diagram. system size dependence of the freeze-out parameters at RHIC. Bulk particle production provide: Kinetic freeze-out properties from spectral shapes Tkin at kinetic freeze-out, transverse radial flow (β) Chemical freeze-out properties from particle ratios Tch at chemical freeze-out, strangeness and baryon production Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  4. Experimental Observation: the bulk of produced matter is “soft” (99%) to study the QGP → study hadronization and properties of produced particles species abundances (Chemical freeze-out and equilibration) momentum distributions (Kinetic freeze-out) q q Heavy ion collision evolution the current view Collision Hot, Dense Matter, QGP? Inelastic Scattering Hard Partonic Scattering Hadronization Phase Elastic Scattering time: the system cools and expands Chemical Freeze-out Kinetic Freeze-out Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  5. J.Stachel (Trento 2004) Mapping the QCD Phase Diagram • Lattice QCD predicts critical temperature for QGP phase boundary: • Tc ~ 170 MeV ec ~ 1 GeV/fm3 • Experimentally derived freeze-out parameters from different experiments • Extend the measurements at RHIC over a broad range of • Energy • Centrality • System size Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  6. STAR Experiment Time Projection Chamber Measures charged particle momenta and energy loss within |h|<1 Full azimuthal acceptance Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  7. Exploit the ionization energy loss (dE/dx) Distribution normalized by the theoretical expectation for different particle types. Normalized distribution sliced into dp=50MeV/c for |y|<0.1 (mid-rapidity) 6 centrality bins (60% of the cross-section) Cu+Cu @ √sNN=62.4GeV and 200 GeV. Raw yields: extracted from multi-Gaussian fits. Consistent analysis technique for Different center-of-mass energies Colliding systems. Low-pT particle identification normalized pion kaon electron proton Cu+Cu 200 GeV Minimum Bias Cu+Cu 200 GeV 0-10% central 0.50<pT<0.55 GeV/c STAR Preliminary Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  8. Chemical freeze-out Statistical model approach: particle ratios described by 4 fit parameters: chemical freeze-out temperature,Tch baryon chemical potential, μB strangeness chemical potential, μS strangeness suppression, gS STAR Preliminary 10% central, Cu+Cu @ 62.4 GeV 10% central, Cu+Cu @ 200 GeV Phys.Lett.B465(1999)15, arXiv:nucl-th/0405068 Fits use only data from p, K and p Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  9. Chemical freeze-out • mB decreases with increasing collision energy • Approaching a net baryon free system • Freeze-out temperature independent of initial conditions • Collision energy • Energy density • Net baryon density • Strangeness suppression (gs) approaches unity with increasing Nch Approaching ‘net baryon free’ Universal Tch~160MeV Chemical equilibrium Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  10. Preliminary Transverse momentum spectra Spectra Mass dependence • Pressure build-up in the center, large pressure gradient  collective expansion • Common expansion velocity? Preliminary Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  11. Kinetic freeze-out PRC48 (1993) 2462 • Hydro-dynamically motivated “blast-wave” model fits • Gain insight into the dynamics of the collision. • Model assumes a boosted thermal source in transverse and longitudinal directions. • Can describe the data with a common set of fit parameters • Transverse flow velocity, β • Kinetic freeze-out temperature, Tkin • Studies show that resonance decays (at RHIC energies) do not affect the fit results significantly 10% central, Cu+Cu @ 200 GeV STAR Preliminary Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  12. Freeze-out properties STAR Preliminary • Extracted freeze-out parameters • similar for the same number of produced charged-particles, Nch • For all systems • For all colliding energies Tch Tkin Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  13. Freeze-out properties STAR Preliminary TC • Tkin , ‹b› with centrality • information on system expansion • Explosive system, higher b • higher pressure gradients in central events • Tch insensitive to centrality • Insensitive to expansion and cooling • Close to TC • QCD predicted TC~160-170 MeV • Coincides with hadronization • Thus, chemical freeze-out may probe the phase boundary Tch Tkin Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  14. Probing the phase boundary • Current systematics: • Increasing collision energy • Using different collision systems and centrality • Next step: • RHIC low-energy scan J.Stachel (Trento 2004) Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  15. Baryon/meson production R.Hollis WWND07 Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 152301 Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 112301 • Low-pT • Baryon < meson • Centrality independent • Ratio similar to p+p • Intermediate pT ratio enhanced relative to p+p • Maximal at pT~2GeV/c • Strong centrality dependence • centrality independent for pT>5GeV/c (Cu+Cu) and pT>7GeV/c (Au+Au) Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  16. Baryon/meson production • Energy dependence • Centrality dependence of Anti-proton/p enhancement versus pT is similar in 200 and 62.4GeV Phys. Lett. B 655 (2007) 104 Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  17. L/K0S Baryon/meson production • Enhancement also evident in strangeness sector • L/K0 shows the same systematic dependencies Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  18. Nucl. Phys. A715 (2003) p474 NA49 (SPS/CERN) PR C60 044904 (1999) E802 (AGS/BNL) Strangeness production • Small system versus large system: • Strangeness enhancement reported at the AGS and SPS • Relative to p+p • K/p ratio Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  19. Charged kaon enhancement • Charged kaons are enhanced in the Cu+Cu system compared to the Au+Au • At the same Npart Kaon dN/dy STAR Preliminary Npart Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  20. STAR Preliminary K/p - Cu+Cu versus Au+Au • K-/p- versus Npart • no apparent strangeness enhancement • Relative to the p spectra reference • p are “enhanced” in the same way as kaons • Question: if pions (and perhaps all species) are “enhanced”, is Npart the relevant variable for comparison? • Look at Nch as the comparison variable • Nch ~ p STAR Preliminary Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  21. Systematic study • System size • Center-of-mass energy similar values for all systems vs Nch Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  22. mean-pT vs Nch STAR Preliminary Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  23. mean-pT vs Npart STAR Preliminary Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  24. mean-pT vs Npart STAR Preliminary Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  25. mean-pT vs Nch STAR Preliminary All studied systems and energies are described better when using Nch, Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  26. Summary • STAR has enlarged the variety of hadron spectra measurements at RHIC by providing new results for Cu+Cu at two different center-of-mass energies, √s=200 and 62.4 GeV. • The freeze-out properties (Tch, Tkin, gS, b) at RHIC energies seem to scale by the number of produced charged hadrons at mid-rapidity • determined at the initial stages of the collision and driven by the initial energy density, • Tch coincides with the LGT predicted Tc which is around 160 MeV. • In both Cu+Cu and Au+Au collisions, mid-rapidity baryon production at intermediate pT is enhanced compared to that of mesons indicating the coalescence process for hadronization. Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

  27. High-pT and Nch Phys. Lett. B 655 (2007) 104 STAR Preliminary STAR Preliminary p++p- p++p- Au+Au 200GeV Au+Au 62.4GeV Au+Au 200GeV Au+Au 62.4GeV • similar scaling trends? • Ncoll relevant at higher pT • scaling with Nch (at mid-rapidity) for high-pT data Aneta Iordanova University of Illinois at Chicago

More Related