1 / 14

AN ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL FOR A HIBRID REACTOR (SUB-CRITICAL FACILITY COUPLED WITH AN ACCELERADOR)

AN ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL FOR A HIBRID REACTOR (SUB-CRITICAL FACILITY COUPLED WITH AN ACCELERADOR). Sergio A. Pereira and Adimir dos Santos. Schematic representation of Rubbia’s Energy Amplifier. RUBIA’S PROPOSAL. a cyclotron like this is not possible nowadays

lucian
Télécharger la présentation

AN ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL FOR A HIBRID REACTOR (SUB-CRITICAL FACILITY COUPLED WITH AN ACCELERADOR)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AN ALTERNATIVE PROPOSAL FOR A HIBRID REACTOR (SUB-CRITICAL FACILITY COUPLED WITH AN ACCELERADOR) Sergio A. Pereira and Adimir dos Santos

  2. Schematic representation of Rubbia’s Energy Amplifier

  3. RUBIA’S PROPOSAL • a cyclotron like this is not possible nowadays • with one spallation point, the central fuel • elements will achieve higher temperature and burn • with higher radial power density • to start the reactor, the lead must be liquid • - aprox. 4 months • Pressure vessel - 30m high • structural problems during earthquakes • the vapor generator and core maintenance is remote • and very difficult, due to the liquid lead

  4. Objectives • more than one point of spallation: • - reduce the requirement of proton energy and current • of the accelerator, • - to make a flatter power density distribution. • the subcritical core is replaced by a concept of a solid lead • calandria with the fuel elements in channels cooled by Helium: • - allows on line refueling or shuffling, • - utilization of a direct thermodynamic cycle (Brayton), • which is more efficient than a vapor cycle • the utilization of He as coolant: • - more realistic, since the gas cooled reactors technology • is well established, • - more efficient from the thermodynamic view, allowing • simplification and the utilization in high temperature • process like hydrogen generation

  5. Calculation LAHET/HETC Heat generated in the spallation region and their products Angular, spatial and energetic distribution of the neutron and photon sources Methodology to be used on simulations Spallation region dimension NJOY TRANSM Cross section and energy deposition KERMA MCNP-4C Power, Power distribution, Keff, Energy deposition, etc ...

  6. First thermal barrier: area- Ael temp - T1 Tel (800-850°C) Second thermal barrier: area - AHe temp. - T2 Fuel Element APb He cooling pipe ( THe ) L (radiation) (conduction) (convection)

  7. Experimental and calculated results of THOR experiment Experimental and calculated results of JEZEBEL experiment

  8. Comparison between EA parameters obtained with FLUKA and LCS Comparison between proton been results obtained with FLUKA and LAHET

  9. Cylindrical fuel element representation with a hexagonal fuel rod distribution Alternative concept with 3 spallation regions

  10. Radial power density distribution of the 3 spallation sources configuration

  11. Final results

  12. CONCLUSION • the methodology utilized reproduces with good accuracy the • benchmark results • in order to keep the lead solid, the solution of using pipes with • helium between the fuel elements guarantees that the temperature • will stay well below the limit (328 C) • the proposed conception possesses a gain of 70. For a 1GeV proton • the gain is 110 which is closer to Rubia ( 120) • using a tree spallation source configuration we achieved a • formfactor smaller than 2, when compared with 7, in the case • with one central spallation source configuration.

  13. FUTURE WORK • Fuel burnup • Nuclear Data for Th-232 and U-233 • Nuclear Data for the Spallation Process • Experimental Support . Closest to the Desirable is MYRRHA . Still in the design stage.

More Related