1 / 11

Fostering a Technology Transfer Network in Russia: Insights from the OECD Workshop

This workshop, held in Yekaterinburg on December 10, 2003, highlighted the importance of creating a robust technology transfer (TT) network in Russia. Speaker Paul van Grevenstein shared insights from over 14 years of experience in major US/EU corporations and academia, emphasizing the role of academia in enhancing innovation. Key themes included unlocking the value of publicly funded research, mobilizing research talent, and establishing governance structures for effective TT. The session aimed to inspire participants to adapt international best practices in a Russian context.

luigi
Télécharger la présentation

Fostering a Technology Transfer Network in Russia: Insights from the OECD Workshop

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fostering a TT network in Russia Paul van Grevenstein – STI Mgt OECD-Russian Ministry of Education Workshop Yekaterinburg, 10 December 2003

  2. “Health Warning” • Views speaker: 14 years major listed US/EU “b2b” corporations + 7 years EU academia (Leiden University Med Center) • Experience base: not 1 mere PRO, but ASTP, AUTM, LESa.o. best practices

  3. LUMC • Anno 1575: “Influential beacon of medical learning” • Anno 1996: teaching hospital & MedFac combined • Core: translational biomolecular & genetic (“prominent”) • Ca. 50 MM€ p/y R&D; ca. 40% competitive funding • Ca. 1000 research staff (LUMC total: > 7000) • TT: EU FP consortia, IP, licensing, contracts (MTA’s, CDA, CRA, CTA ao) • Also “science-offs” (total LS Leiden: 50 cy’s/3000 fte)

  4. TT: why ? • Academia plays vital role in “pre-dominant-design phase” of innovation => new strategic goal of Academia: UTILISATION • unlock & leverage value of research (nb taxpayer) • discoveries for innovation pipeline of region/nation • not mere €€€’s, but socio-economic societal benefits • tied to mgt of knowledge, R&D, innovation and HR • access to cutting edge Knowledge, technology and equipment • reward/retain, mobilise and attract research talent • (acquire additional funding for Knowledge development) • Required for succesful utilisation of innovative Knowledge ex publicly funded research: adequate technology transfer

  5. TT network • First step/founding father(s) ? • Private or public initiative ? • Structure ? • Mission ? • Funding ? • Membership base ? • Governance ? • Activities ?

  6. ASTP (1) • Brussels ‘99: although AUTM, UNICO and EARMA/TII: clear unmet needs for true professional TT in EU • => initiative of a few PRO individuals • Non-profit association (e.g. Dutch Law; The Hague) • Mission: promote & professionalise TT at EU science base • Funding: self-sustaining (members, activities & sponsoring only. No EU or other public funding) • Membership base: individuals; true practitioners (“mud”) • Governance: lean Board (6) with broad spectrum (**) • Secretariat & administration outsourced

  7. ASTP (2) • Activities: • Note: cater for experienced, intermediate & novice • CPD: workshops, seminars, conferences, Executive Fora • Networking: face to face, E-group • Information: mailings & membership guide • Surveys: sofar 1 pilot (data !?) • Publications: not yet, but readers/slides • External contacts: e.g. OECD and EU Commission • Collaborations: e.g. AUTM (+ Int’l Federation), LES, MANCEF, EIRMA, (ProTon**)

  8. => Premier pan-European network of academic TT professionals Ca. 325 members/175 PRO’s/30 countries (incl. Russia, Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, Poland) Proven track record & recognised authority (**)

  9. TT(O): a few remarks • TT = dedicated; people’s business; near to bench • TTO: although depending on local circum-stances: arm’s length ! • TTO staff: professionals, i.a. legal, IP & business development + genuine industry experience • TT skillset: not mere research- or patent “administration” type (cf. former SUPA)

  10. => How to “à la Russe” ? • Do by all means form a national association • First step: government initiation = o.k. if no other • But 1: no copy; adapt to your local needs • But 2: clear focus group, active individuals, no research policy/admin persons • Also: do benefit from & work with existing international networks like ASTP

  11. Thank you • PS 1: ASTP Budapest 27/28 May 2004 (%) • PS 2: 2003 EU Report “Guidelines for IP Management in PRO’s”. Cf website: http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/era/pdf/iprmanagementguidelines-report.pdf • PS 3: PvG = pvg@stim.biz

More Related