C20.0046: Database Management Systems Lecture #26
420 likes | 558 Vues
Join Professor Matthew P. Johnson from NYU's Stern School of Business for an in-depth lecture on advanced concepts in Database Management Systems (DBMS), focusing on B-Trees, indices, and data structures. This session covers the mechanics of clustered and unclustered B-Trees, their efficiency in searching, and their practical applications in prevalent database systems. Explore failure recovery, data warehousing, and the intricacies of concurrency control. Perfect for students aiming to enhance their understanding of modern DBMS architecture.
C20.0046: Database Management Systems Lecture #26
E N D
Presentation Transcript
C20.0046: Database Management SystemsLecture #26 Matthew P. Johnson Stern School of Business, NYU Spring, 2004 M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Agenda • Previously: Indices • Next: • Finish Indices, advanced indices • Failure/recovery • Data warehousing & mining • Websearch • Hw3 due today • no extensions! • 1-minute responses • Review: clustered, dense, primary, #/tbl, syntax M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Let’s get physical Query update User/ Application Query compiler/optimizer Query execution plan Transaction commands Record, index requests Execution engine Index/record mgr. • Transaction manager: • Concurrency control • Logging/recovery Page commands Buffer manager Read/write pages Storage manager storage M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
BSTs • Very simple data structure in CS: BSTs • Binary Search Trees • Keep balanced • Each node ~ one item • Each node has two children: • Left subtree: < • Right subtree: >= • Can search, insert, delete in log time • log2(1MB = 220) = 20 M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Search for DBMS • Big improvement: log2(1MB) = 20 • Each op divides remaining range in half! • But recall: all that matters is #disk accesses • 20 is better than 220 but: Can we do better? M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
BSTs B-trees • Like BSTs except each node ~ one block • Branching factor is >> 2 • Each access divides remaining range by, say, 300 • B-trees = BSTs + blocks • B+ trees are a variant of B-trees • Data stored only in leaves • Leaves form a (sorted) linked list • Better supports range queries • Consequences: • Much shorter depth Many fewer disk reads • Must find element within node • Trades CPU/RAM time for disk time M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
B+ Trees • Parameter n branching factor is n+1 • Largest number s.t. one block can contain n search-key values and n+1 pointers • Each node (except root) has at least n/2 keys Keys k < 30 Keys 120<=k<240 Keys 240<=k Keys 30<=k<120 Next leaf 40 50 60 M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Searching a B+ Tree Select name From people Where age = 25 • Exact key values: • Start at the root • If we’re in leaf, walk through its key values; • If not, look at keys K1..Kn • If Ki <= K <= Ki+1, look in child i • Range queries: • As above • Then walk left until test fails Select name From people Where 20 <= age and age <= 30 M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
B+ Tree Example Find the key 40 n = 4 40 80 20 < 40 60 30 < 40 40 10 15 18 20 30 40 50 60 65 80 85 90 NB: Leaf keys are sorted; data pointed to is only if clustered M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Clustered & unclustered B-trees Data entries Dataentries (Index File) (Data file) DataRecords Data Records CLUSTERED UNCLUSTERED
B+ trees, and, or • Assume index on a,b,c • Intuition: phone book • WHERE a = ‘x’ and b = ‘y’ • WHERE b = ‘y’ and c = ‘z’ • WHERE a = ‘a’ and c = ‘z’ • WHERE a = ‘x’ or b = ‘y’ or c = ‘z’ M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
B+ trees and LIKE • Supports only hard-coded prefix LIKE checks • Intuition: phone book • Select * from T where a like ‘xyz%’ • Select * from T where a like ‘%xyz’ • Select * from T where a like ‘xyz%zyx%’ M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
B-tree search efficiency • With params: • block=4k • integer = 4b, • pointer = 8b • the largest n satisfying 4n+8(n+1) <= 4096 is n=340 • Each node has 170..340 keys • assume on avg has (170+340)/2=255 • Then: • 255 rows depth = 1 • 2552 = 64k rows depth = 2 • 2553 = 16M rows depth = 3 • 2554 = 4G rows depth = 4 M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
B-trees in practice • Most DBMSs use B-trees for most indices • Default in MySQL • Default in Oracle • Speeds up • where clauses • Some like checks • Min or max functions • joins • Limitation: fields used must • Be a prefix of indexed fields • Be ANDed together M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Next topic: Advanced types of indices • Spatial indices based on R-trees (R = region) • Support multi-dimensional searches on “geometry” fields • 2-d not 1-d ranges • Oracle: • MySQL: CREATE INDEX geology_rtree_idx ON geology_tab(geometry) INDEXTYPE IS MDSYS.SPATIAL_INDEX; CREATE TABLE geom (g GEOMETRY NOT NULL, SPATIAL INDEX(g)); M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Advanced types of indices • Inverted indices for web doc search • First, think of each webpage as a tuple • One column for every possible word • True means the word appears on the page • Index on all columns • Now can search: you’re fired • select * from T where youre=T and fired=T M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Advanced types of indices • Can simplify somewhat: • For each field index, delete False entries • True entries for each index become a bucket • Create “inverted index”: • One entry for each search word • Search word entry points to corresponding bucket • Bucket points to pages with its word • Amazon M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Advanced types of indices • Function-based indices • Speeds up WHERE upper(name)=‘BUSH’, etc. • Now supported in Oracle 8, not MySQL • Bitmap indices • Speeds up arbitrary combination of reqs • Not limited to prefixes or conjunctions • Now supported in Oracle 9, not MySQL create index on T(my_soundex(name)); create index on T(substr(DOB),4,5)); M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Bitmap indices • Assume table has n records • Assume F is a field with m different values • Bitmap index on F: m length-n bitstrings • One bitstring for each value of F • Each one says which rows have that value for F • Example: • n = , mF = , mG = • Q: find rows where F=50 or (F=30 and G=‘Baz’) M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Bitmap index search • Larger example: (age,salary) of jewelry buyers: • Bitmaps for age: • 25:100000001000, 30:000000010000, 45:01000000100, 50:001110000010, 60:000000000001, 70:000001000000, 85:000000100000 • Bitmaps for salary: • 60:110000000000, 75:001000000000, 100:000100000000, 110:000001000000, 120:000010000000, 140:000000100000, 260:000000010001, 275:000000000010, 350:000000000100, 400:000000001000 M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Bitmap index search • Query: find buyers of age 45-55 with salary 100-200 • Age range: 010000000100 (45) | 001110000010 (50) = 011110000110 • Bitwise or of Salary range: 000111100000 • AND together: 011110000110 & 000111100000 = 000110000000 • What does this mean? M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Bitmap index search • Once we have row numbers, then what? • Get rows with those numbers (How?) • Bitmap indices in Oracle: • Best for low-cardinality fields • Boolean, enum, gender • lots of 0s in our bitmaps • Compress: 000000100001 6141 • “run-length encoding” CREATE BITMAP INDEX ON T(F,G); M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
New topic: Recovery M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
System Failures • Each transaction has internal state • When system crashes, internal state is lost • Don’t know which parts executed and which didn’t • Remedy: use a log • A file that records each action of each xact • Trail of breadcrumbs M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Media Failures • Rule of thumb: Pr(hard drive has head crash within 10 years) = 50% • Simpler rule of thumb: Pr(hard drive has head crash within 1 years) = 10% • Serious problem • Soln: different RAID strategies • RAID: Redundant Arrays of Independent Disks M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
RAID levels • RAID level 1: each disk gets a mirror • RAID level 4: one disk is xor of all others • Each bit is sum mod 2 of corresponding bits • E.g.: • Disk 1: 11110000 • Disk 2: 10101010 • Disk 3: 00111000 • Disk 4: • How to recover? M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Transactions • Transaction: unit of code to be executed atomically • In ad-hoc SQL • one command = one transaction • In embedded SQL • Transaction starts = first SQL command issued • Transaction ends = • COMMIT • ROLLBACK (=abort) • Can turn off/on autocommit M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Primitive operations of transactions • Each xact reads/writes rows or blocks: elms • INPUT(X) • read element X to memory buffer • READ(X,t) • copy element X to transaction local variable t • WRITE(X,t) • copy transaction local variable t to element X • OUTPUT(X) • write element X to disk • LOG RECORD M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Transaction example • Xact: Transfer $100 from savings to checking • A = A+100; • B = B-100; • READ(A,t); • t := t+100; • WRITE(A,t); • READ(B,t); • t := t-100; • WRITE(B,t) M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Transaction example • READ(A,t); t := t+100;WRITE(A,t); READ(B,t); t := t-100;WRITE(B,t) M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
The log • An append-only file containing log records • Note: multiple transactions run concurrently, log records are interleaved • After a system crash, use log to: • Redo some transaction that didn’t commit • Undo other transactions that didn’t commit • Three kinds of logs: undo, redo, undo/redo • We’ll discuss only Undo M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Undo Logging • Log records • <START T> • transaction T has begun • <COMMIT T> • T has committed • <ABORT T> • T has aborted • <T,X,v> • T has updated element X, and its old value was v M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Undo-Logging Rules • U1: Changes logged (<T,X,v>) before being written to disk • U2: Commits logged (<COMMIT T>) after being written to disk • Results: • May forget we did whole xact (and so wrongly undo) • Will never forget did partial xact (and so leave) • Log-change, change, log-change, change, Commit, log-commit M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Undo-Logging e.g. (inputs omitted) M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Recovery with Undo Log • After system’s crash, run recovery manager • Decide for each xact T whether it was completed • Undo all modifications from incomplete xacts, in reverse order (why?) and abort each <START T>….<COMMIT T> yes <START T>….<ABORT T> yes <START T>…………………… no M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Recovery with Undo Log • Read log from the end; cases: • <COMMIT T>: mark T as completed • <ABORT T>: mark T as completed • <T,X,v>: • <START T>: ignore if T is not completed then write X=v to disk else ignore M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Recovery with Undo Log … … <T2,X2,v2> … … <START T5> <START T4> <T1,X1,v1> <T5,X5,v5> <T4,X4,v4> <COMMIT T5> <T3,X3,v3> <T2,X2,v2> Start: Q: Which updates areundone? Crash! M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Recovery with Undo Log • Note: undo commands are idempotent • No harm done if we repeat them • Q: What if system crashes during recovery? • How far back in the log do we go? • Don’t go all the way back to the start • May be very large • Better idea: use checkpointing M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Checkpointing • Checkpoint the database periodically • Stop accepting new transactions • Wait until all current xacts complete • Flush log to disk • Write a <CKPT> log record, flush log • Resume accepting new xacts M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Undo Recovery with Checkpointing … … <T1,X1,v1> … … (all completed) <CKPT> <START T2> <START T3 <START T5> <START T4> <T4,X4,v4> <T5,X5,v5> <T4,X4,v4> <COMMIT T5> <T3,X3,v3> <T2,X2,v2> other xacts During recovery, can stop at first <CKPT> xacts T2,T3,T4,T5 M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Non-quiescent Checkpointing • Problem: database must freeze during checkpoint • Would like to checkpoint while database is operational • Idea: non-quiescent checkpointing • Quiescent: quiet, still, at rest; inactive M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004
Next time • Next: Data warehousing mining! • For next time: reading online • Proj5 due next Thursday • no extensions! • Now: one-minute responses • Relative weight: warehousing, mining, websearch • Data mining techniques • NNs • GAs • kNN • Decision Trees M.P. Johnson, DBMS, Stern/NYU, Sp2004