1 / 8

Status of VoIP Emergency Services Support in 3GPP2

Status of VoIP Emergency Services Support in 3GPP2. QUALCOMM, 8 September 2006. Summary of Current Status. Requirements (stage 1) Latest version is 3GPP2 S.P0115-0 Version 0.4 ( S.P0115 ) Produced by 3GPP2 TSG-S with input from TSG-X

lula
Télécharger la présentation

Status of VoIP Emergency Services Support in 3GPP2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status of VoIP Emergency Services Support in 3GPP2 QUALCOMM, 8 September 2006

  2. Summary of Current Status • Requirements (stage 1) • Latest version is 3GPP2 S.P0115-0 Version 0.4 (S.P0115) • Produced by 3GPP2 TSG-S with input from TSG-X • Now undergoing V&V with approval expected in the September Xian meeting • Design (stage 2) • Most impacts (e.g. MMD) will concern TSG-X • Some impacts (e.g. HRPD, WLAN) will concern TSG-C • Work has not yet started formally although interested companies have been discussing informally • Signaling (stage 3) • Expected to start some time after the Design starts but possibly before it is complete Note: TSG-S cover Services and Systems Aspects; TSG-C cover the cdma2000 radio interface; TSG-X cover the Core Network

  3. Within Requirements - 1 • PSTN capable PSAPs • IP capable radio interfaces • HRPD (cdma2000-EvDO) • cdma2000-1x • WLAN • Authorized UEs • implies home network subscription and roaming agreement • Voice calls • Support for roaming and non-roaming scenarios • Note that serving and home systems are assumed to be cdma2000 • Routing to a PSAP based on the caller’s location and the required PSAP (e.g. fire, police, ambulance etc.)

  4. Within Requirements - 2 • PSAP callback based on a TEL URI • Inclusion of UE location (cell/sector, civil or geographic) in an emergency call request when available • Provision of accurate initial UE location to a PSAP • Provision of accurate updated UE location to a PSAP during the call • Support handoff between access technologies (same or different) whenever handoff is supported for non-emergency calls • Accurate updated UE location following a handoff • Call Detail Records • Restriction of any supplementary service (e.g. Call Waiting) which would place an emergency call on hold • Priority of emergency calls over other services

  5. Within Requirements - 3 • A UE SHOULD be able to detect an emergency call • Support for local emergency numbers and addresses (TEL URI, SIP URI) • Call control signaling and bearer MAY be handled in the serving network without routing through the home network • Minimizing call setup delay has high priority • Additional essential capabilities (e.g. voice call continuity) may affect the preference for visited versus home network support

  6. Excluded from Requirements • IP (SIP) capable PSAPs • Additional media (e.g. text messages, pictures, video) • Calls from unauthorized UEs (e.g. no UIM) • Note that some of these items may be supported in a later phase

  7. Design Expectations • Likely to maximize use of existing 3GPP2 capabilities – MMD (IMS), HRPD, WLAN, LCS • Based on (e.g.) experience in 3GPP and solutions from NENA, impacts to MMD, HRPD, WLAN, LCS can be expected • New servers likely to be added to the serving network – e.g. specialized SIP server (CSCF or AS) for emergency calls, separate location and routing server(s) • Reference to or inclusion of IETF and NENA capabilities (e.g. Geopriv pidf-lo, LoST, NENA i2)

  8. Design Questions • IP Access • Simple IP versus Mobile IP • For MIP, Home Agent in the home network or allowed in the visited network • IPv4 versus IPv6 • Which combinations should be supported? • Registration in the home network via the serving network (e.g. serving network P-CSCF) or not • Call establishment exclusively via the visited network versus via the home network (and visited network) • Suitable procedures for obtaining an interim location for routing and a more accurate location for PSAP delivery • Support of handoff and voice call continuity (VCC) • Applicability of ongoing solutions in 3GPP, NENA, IETF

More Related