1 / 28

ED Risk Stratification for Chest Pain

Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: Risk Stratification Based on the ACC/AHA UA / NSTEMI Guidelines. ED Risk Stratification for Chest Pain. For the past 20 years. In 2002: Does this patient need fibrinolytic therapy?

lumina
Télécharger la présentation

ED Risk Stratification for Chest Pain

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Non-ST-Segment ElevationAcute Coronary Syndromes:Risk Stratification Based on the ACC/AHA UA / NSTEMI Guidelines

  2. ED Risk Stratification for Chest Pain For the past 20 years . . . In 2002: • Does this patient need fibrinolytic therapy? • Should this patient get anti-thrombin and anti-platelet agents? • Can I safely send this patient home? R/O MI

  3. ED  CCU  Cath Lab Risk Stratification for Chest Pain Three levels of risk stratification are pertinent to the ED: • Low, intermediate, orhigh risk that ischemic symptoms are a result of CAD • Low, intermediate, or highrisk of short-term death or nonfatal MI from ACS • Dynamic, ongoing risk-oriented evaluation of low- or intermediate-risk patients for “conversion” to high-risk status that is linked to intensity of treatment

  4. Chest Pain History, Physical EKG Definite Non-Cardiac STEMI UA/NSTEMI/ High Risk Mod Risk Low Risk Initial Risk Stratification Scheme

  5. Risk Stratification Tools in the ED • History and Physical • Standard ECG and Non-standard ECG leads • Cardiac Biomarkers • Troponin I or T, CK-MB, myoglobin • Predictive Indices / Schemes • Non-Invasive Imaging Studies • Echocardiogram • Exercise testing • Technetium-99m-sestamibi: stress and rest

  6. I IIa IIb III Initial EvaluationRisk Stratification (1) Early risk stratification by symptoms, physical findings, ECG, cardiac markers 12-lead ECG within 10 min for ongoing pain, or ASAP if pain has resolved at presentation Cardiac markers, Troponins and CK-MB, for initial assessment Monitoring, repeat ECG and cardiac markers in 6-12 hours, if initial results normal

  7. I IIa IIb III Initial EvaluationRisk Stratification (2) If <6 hours after symptom onset, add early myoglobin or CK-MB to troponin C-reactive protein, other markers of inflammation Total CK, SGOT, HBDH, LDH

  8. Clinical Assessment (1) • Rapid, focused evaluation • Decisions based on this evaluation have substantial clinical and economic consequences • Are the symptoms a manifestation of ACS? • If so, what is the prognosis? • Identify signs of life-threatening instability • Triage to most appropriate area • Typically an ED or chest pain unit

  9. Clinical Assessment (2) • Risk status determined in the ED by: • Assessment of anginal symptoms • Careful physical examination • Electrocardiogram • Cardiac biomarkers • CAD risk factors • Illicit drug use • Initial risk stratification assignment drives pace of subsequent evaluation and treatment

  10. Clinical Assessment (3) • High-risk features apparent in the ED: • Accelerated pattern of angina • Ongoing rest pain > 20 min • Signs of CHF • Hemodynamic instability • Arrhythmias - Atrial or ventricular • Advanced age (> 75 years) • Ischemic ECG changes • Elevated cardiac markers

  11. Electrocardiogram • Carries diagnostic and prognostic value • Especially valuable if captured during pain • ST-segment depression or transient ST-segment elevation are primary ECG markers of UA/NSTEMI • 75% of patients with + CK-MB do not develop Q waves • Differentiation between UA and NSTEMI relies upon positive biomarkers • Inverted T-waves suggestive of ischemia, particularly with good chest pain story

  12. Six-Month Mortality by Baseline ECG Findings -GUSTO-IIb Results 10% ST  8% ST  6% % Mortality 4% NS ST-Ts 2% 0% 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 Days from Randomization Savonitto, JAMA 1999

  13. Biomarkers: CK/CKMB • Until recently the principal serum marker used in evaluation of ACS despite known limitations: • Low levels in healthy persons limits specificity • MB band may be elevated in skeletal muscle damage • Different MB isoforms exist in myocardium (MB2) and in plasma (MB1), and differentiating assay is not widely available

  14. Biomarkers: Troponins • Very useful in diagnosis and prognosis of ACS • Normally not detectable in blood of healthy persons; • cTnI or cTnT can be positive with negative CK-MB = “minor myocardial damage” • Predictive of MI and death when elevated, independent of CK-MB levels • Elevated troponins validated as a predictor of enhanced treatment benefit from aggressive therapies (LMW heparins, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, early invasive strategy)

  15. Troponin as a Marker of Increased Risk in ACS

  16. Long Term Survival and Troponin-T Status GUSTO-IIa Results 1-Year Mortality Rates: Troponin-T Positive: 14% Troponin-T Negative: 5% TnT - p < 0.001 TnT +

  17. Biomarkers: Myoglobin • Utility limited by release kinetics (early) and by lack of cardiac specificity • Isolated elevation of myoglobin 4-8 hours after pain onset with a a non-diagnostic ECG must be supplemented by a more cardiac-specific marker • Sufficiently sensitive that a negative myoglobin 4-8 hours after pain onset is useful in excluding myocardial necrosis

  18. Integration of Biomarkers with Clinical History • Time since symptom onset should be a factor in marker selection and in repeat assay strategy • Elevated serum levels of troponins persist for 7-14 days after initial release • Delta values, as close as 2 hours apart, may be sufficiently sensitive to assist with serial evaluations • Serial cardiac marker strategy not specified

  19. Myoglobin CK-MB (mass) Troponin T Myoglobin CK-MB (mass) Troponin T 100% 100% 75% 75% 50% 50% 25% 25% 0% 0% 3 4 5 6 8 12 3 4 5 6 8 12 Serial Cardiac Markers Serial Testing in 309 Patients with Suspected MI Sensitivity Hours After Symptom Onset Hours After Symptom Onset Hours After Symptom Onset Winter, Circulation, 1995

  20. Biomarkers: Bedside Testing • Consideration of bedside marker assay recommended when hospital lab turnaround time > 30-60 minutes • Ready-for-use availability must be balanced against need for stringent QC and training of ED personnel, CLIA concerns, political hazards, etc • Prognostic value limited because many assays are qualitative, not quantitative

  21. “Vein-to-Brain” Reporting Times for Cardiac Markers - St. Agnes Hospital Bedside Test (mean=15 mins) Laboratory Test (mean=128 mins) 180 160 140 120 100 Reporting Times (mins) "Vein-to Brain" 80 60 40 20 n = 939 SD = 46.74 0 Test Type Christenson R: Md Med 2001 Spring:Suppl:98-103

  22. Distribution of Reporting Times for Cardiac Markers - St. Agnes Hospital 284 mins = Latest Reporting Time (201.3 mins) 95th percentile (147 mins) 75th percentile (Median , 117 mins) 50th percentile Range of Lab Reporting Times (85 mins) 25th percentile (62.6 mins) 5th percentile 40 mins = Earliest Reporting Time Christenson R: Md Med 2001 Spring:Suppl:98-103

  23. Noninvasive Studies • Guidelines do not consider use of these tests in the ED setting, although: • Many EDs now use rest sestamibi scanning in the risk stratification process • Stress testing used after patients have “ruled out” • Reality dictates that appropriate provocative testing often not likely after patient leaves ED • ED is the “first, last, and best shot” at intervening in patients with risk concerns

  24. Predictive Indices - Risk Scores in the ED • Combine clinical history, physical exam findings, ECG signs of ischemia, and cardiac marker results • PURSUIT and TIMI Risk Scores • Therapies such as LMW heparin and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have greater benefit in patients with higher risk scores • Have not been tested prospectively in the ED • Risk scores not specifically recommended by the ACC/AHA Guidelines

  25. I IIa IIb III Immediate Management Classify as non-cardiac, chronic stable angina, possible ACS, or definite ACS Evaluate for immediate reperfusion therapy if definite ACS and ST-segment  present Pharmacological or exercise stress test, if possible ACS and serial biomarkers and ECGs are normal Admit pts with definite ACS, ongoing pain,  biomarkers, new ST  or deep T-wave inversion, abnormal hemodynamics, or (+) stress test

  26. The “Key” to Risk Stratification • Link ongoing evaluation of risk to changes in intensity of therapy • Develop risk stratification schemes that reflect capabilities of ED and needs/preferences of cardiologists • Develop treatment pathways that provide for independent response of emergency physicians to recognition of higher risk levels

  27. The “Rallying Cry” for CRUSADE . . . . . . starts with a successful risk stratification strategy A seamless transition of optimal care—diagnostic and therapeutic—from the ED to the Cardiology Service . . .

More Related