1 / 14

Performance Measures: An International Perspective form the International Transit Studies Program

Performance Measures: An International Perspective form the International Transit Studies Program. Lisa Koch, AICP Public Transit Manager Kansas DOT. ITSP. Started in 1994, the ITSP is focused on broadening the professional development of US transit managers by providing them with

luna
Télécharger la présentation

Performance Measures: An International Perspective form the International Transit Studies Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Performance Measures:An International Perspective form the International Transit Studies Program Lisa Koch, AICP Public Transit Manager Kansas DOT

  2. ITSP Started in 1994, the ITSP is focused on broadening the professional development of US transit managers by providing them with opportunities to visit transit system abroad, returning with insights and knowledge useful to their organizations, the transit industry and their own transit careers.

  3. Spring 09 Mission • Explore how performance measurement is used to achieve organizational goals and enhance quality of service at public transport planning, funding and operating agencies in the following locations: • Hong Kong • Singapore • Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia • Taipei, Taiwan

  4. Agencies Visited • Hong Kong • Kowloon Motor Bus • Transport Dept. HK • MTR Corporation • Singapore • SMRT Corporation • Singapore Government • Kuala Lumpur • Rapid KL • Taipei • Taipei Metro • Taipei City Government Photo: Study Team with Taipei Metro Staff

  5. 6 Step Process of Measurement • Strategy Development: How do agencies determine their organizational strategy? Photo: Hong Kong

  6. 6 Step Process of Measurement 2. Measurement Items: What do agencies measure andhow is measurement tied to strategy? Photo: Singapore

  7. 6 Step Process of Measurement 3. Reporting Structure of Data: How often is data reported and to whom? Photo: Kuala Lumpur

  8. 6 Step Process of Measurement 4. Quality Control: How effectively are the measurement items in providing useful data? Photo: Lunch with Taipei Metro

  9. 6 Step Process of Measurement 5. Course Correction: What does the agency do when targets are not being met or measurement items are not providing appropriate feedback? Photo: Taipei

  10. 6 Step Process of Measurement 6. How Data/Results Alter Policy/Strategy: How do results effect future year’s annual budget, strategic plans and other future policy opportunities? Photo: Hong Kong Transit

  11. Agency Measurement • Frequent use of Balanced Scorecard - method of tying performance measurement to strategic goals • ISO measures • Benchmarking though CoMET and NOVA Photo: Hong Kong

  12. Role of Regulators • Limited subsidy (start-up capital) • Franchisee Agreements for bus and rail • Required regular reporting with set targets • Targets are generally lower than internal measures set by franchisee Photo: Malaysia

  13. Reflections • Most agencies had limited connections between strategy development and performance measurement • Quality control of data was lacking • Results from performance measurement were not tied to future strategic/financial planning Photo: Singapore

  14. Questions for Discussion • Are State DOT’s using performance measurement with subgrantees (other than to determine minimum compliance with FTA/State provisions)? • Are specific targets set? • Is any funding tied to performance? • What data is collected? • How is data collected? • Do State DOT’s encourage/participate in benchmarking of subgrantees?

More Related