1 / 15

Design of Engineering Experiments – The 2 k Factorial Design

Design of Engineering Experiments – The 2 k Factorial Design. Text reference, Chapter 6 Special case of the general factorial design; k factors, all at two levels The two levels are usually called low and high (they could be either quantitative or qualitative)

lynch
Télécharger la présentation

Design of Engineering Experiments – The 2 k Factorial Design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Design of Engineering Experiments– The 2k Factorial Design • Text reference, Chapter 6 • Special case of the general factorial design; k factors, all at two levels • The two levels are usually called low and high (they could be either quantitative or qualitative) • Very widely used in industrial experimentation • Form a basic “building block” for other very useful experimental designs • Special (short-cut) methods for analysis

  2. Design of Engineering Experiments– The 2k Factorial Design • Assumptions • The factors are fixed • The designs are completely randomized • Usual normality assumptions are satisfied • It provides the smallest number of runs can be studied in a complete factorial design – used as factor screening experiments • Linear response in the specified range is assumed

  3. The Simplest Case: The 22 “-” and “+” denote the low and high levels of a factor, respectively Low and high are arbitrary terms Geometrically, the four runs form the corners of a square Factors can be quantitative or qualitative, although their treatment in the final model will be different

  4. Chemical Process Example A = reactant concentration, B = catalyst amount, y = recovery

  5. Analysis Procedure for a Factorial Design • Estimate factor effects • Formulate model • With replication, use full model • With an unreplicated design, use normal probability plots • Statistical testing (ANOVA) • Refine the model • Analyze residuals (graphical) • Interpret results

  6. Estimation of Factor Effects See textbook, pg. 206 For manual calculations The effect estimates are: A = 8.33, B = -5.00, AB = 1.67 Practical interpretation

  7. Estimation of Factor Effects • “(1), a, b, ab” – standard order • Used to determine the proper sign for each treatment combination

  8. Statistical Testing - ANOVA Response:Conversion ANOVA for Selected Factorial ModelAnalysis of variance table [Partial sum of squares] Sum ofMeanFSourceSquaresDFSquareValueProb > F Model 291.67 3 97.22 24.82 0.0002A208.331208.3353.19< 0.0001B75.00175.0019.150.0024AB8.3318.332.130.1828 Pure Error 31.33 8 3.92 Cor Total 323.00 11 Std. Dev. 1.98 R-Squared 0.9030 Mean 27.50 Adj R-Squared 0.8666 C.V. 7.20 Pred R-Squared 0.7817 PRESS 70.50 Adeq Precision 11.669 The F-test for the “model” source is testing the significance of the overall model; that is, is either A, B, or AB or some combination of these effects important?

  9. Estimation of Factor EffectsForm Tentative Model Term Effect SumSqr % Contribution Model Intercept Model A 8.33333 208.333 64.4995 Model B -5 75 23.2198 Model AB 1.66667 8.33333 2.57998 Error Lack Of Fit 0 0 Error P Error 31.3333

  10. Regression Model y = bo + b1x1 + b2x2 + b12x1x2 + e or let x3 = x1x2, b3 = b12 y = bo + b1x1 + b2x2 + b3x3 + e A linear regression model. Coded variables are related to natural variables by Therefore,

  11. Statistical Testing - ANOVA CoefficientStandard95% CI95% CI FactorEstimateDFErrorLowHighVIF Intercept 27.50 1 0.57 26.18 28.82 A-Concent 4.17 1 0.57 2.85 5.48 1.00 B-Catalyst -2.50 1 0.57 -3.82 -1.18 1.00 AB 0.83 1 0.57 -0.48 2.15 1.00 General formulas for the standard errors of the model coefficients and the confidence intervals are available. They will be given later.

  12. Refined/reduced Model y = bo + b1x1 + b2x2 + e Response:Conversion ANOVA for Selected Factorial ModelAnalysis of variance table [Partial sum of squares] Sum ofMeanFSourceSquaresDFSquareValueProb > F Model 283.33 2 141.67 32.14 < 0.0001A208.331208.3347.27< 0.0001B75.00175.0017.020.0026 Residual 39.67 9 4.41Lack of Fit8.3318.332.130.1828Pure Error31.3383.92 Cor Total 323.00 11 Std. Dev. 2.10 R-Squared 0.8772 Mean 27.50 Adj R-Squared 0.8499 C.V. 7.63 Pred R-Squared 0.7817 PRESS 70.52 Adeq Precision 12.702 There is now a residual sum of squares, partitioned into a “lack of fit” component (the AB interaction) and a “pure error” component

  13. Regression Model for the Process

  14. Residuals and Diagnostic Checking

  15. The Response Surface Direction of potential improvement for a process (method of steepest ascent)

More Related