220 likes | 325 Vues
In this Biotransport Challenge, you, as a biomedical engineer, are tasked with estimating the time of death in a murder case. The defendant's boyfriend was found dead at 5:30 AM, but the time of death is disputed, with the prosecutor's expert claiming midnight as the time. Using principles of thermal energy balance, body cooling rates, and environmental factors, you must analyze the evidence, refute assumptions made by the prosecution, and propose a new estimate. Key measurements include body and ambient temperatures at various times. Your investigation also encompasses site visits and data requests to gather all necessary information.
E N D
Example of a Challenge Organized Around the Legacy Cycle Course: Biotransport Challenge: Post-mortem Interval
The Challenge: Estimate the Time of Death As a biomedical engineer, you are called to testify as an expert witness on behalf of the defendant, who is accused of murder. The body of her boyfriend was found at 5:30 AM in a creek behind her house. The prosecutor’s expert witness places the time of death at about midnight. The defendant has witnesses that account for her whereabouts before 11 PM and after 2 AM, but she cannot provide an alibi for the period between 11 PM and 2 AM.
Generate Ideas How did the prosecutor’s expert witness arrive at the time of death? What information will you need to challenge the time of death estimate? Discussion Results: How? Rate of Body Cooling. Info? Temperature measurements
Research and Revise Examination of Assumptions
Model and Data used by forensic pathologist to estimate the time of death: • Body temperature at 6 AM (rectal) = 90.5°F • Ambient Temperature = 65°F • Body removed to coroner’s office (65°F) • Body temperature at 8 AM = 88.3°F • Assumed pre-death body temperature = 98.6°F How did the coroner arrive at midnight as the time of death? K = ?
Thermal Energy Balance on Body:Macroscopic Analysis Newton’s Law of Cooling neglect internal resistance to heat transfer: Tcore = Tsurface = T Rate of Accumulation of Thermal Energy Thermal Energy entering body Thermal Energy leaving body Rate of Production of Thermal Energy - + = 0 +0
Are there any assumptions made in deriving the equation used by the pathologist that may be inappropriate for this case?
Your own Investigation • You visit the crime scene. What will you do there? • You visit the coroner’s office. What information do you request? • Any other information you might need?
Investigation determines: • When found, body was almost completely submerged • Body was pulled from the creek when discovered at 5:30 AM • Creek water temperature was 65°F • No detectable footprints other than the victim’s and the person that discovered the body. • Water velocity was nearly zero. • Victim’s body weight = 80 kg • Victim’s body surface area = 1.7 m2 • Cause of death: severe concussion • Medical Records: victim in good health, normal body temperature = 98.6ºF
Your investigation also reveals typical heat transfer coefficients: Heat transfer from a body to a stagnant fluid (W/(m2°C)) • h for air: 2 – 23 • h for water: 100 - 700 • Based on these coefficients, you might expect temperature of a body in stagnant water at 65°F to fall at: • About the same rate as in air at 65°F • At a faster rate than in air at 65°F • At a slower rate than in air at 65°F
New estimate of time of death Provide a procedure that can be used to find the time of death assuming that: • the body was in the creek (h = 100 W/m2ºC) from the time of death until discovered at 5:30 AM. • the body was removed from the creek at 5:30 AM and body temperature measurements made at 6 AM & 8 AM while the body cooled in air (h = 2.46 W/m2ºC).
Summary: Macroscopic Approach (Lumped Parameter Analysis) • Time of death estimated by coroner assuming cooling in air was about midnight (guilty!) • Time of death estimated by your staff assuming initial cooling in water was about 5:22 AM (innocent!). T=98.6°F T(5:30 AM) T=91.1°F T=90.5°F T=88.3°F 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 AM
0 25 of 31 An estimate of Post Mortem Interval (PMI) based on hwater using this method is probably: • Accurate • Too long • Too short
The prosecutor gets wise and hires a biomedical engineer! • Your model prediction is criticized because a lumped analysis (macroscopic) was used. • The witness states that: • internal thermal resistance in the body cannot be neglected. • the body takes longer to cool than you predicted . • body temperature varies with position and time.
(leg) T vs t from different regions Single study
How can we find the ratio of internal to external thermal resistance for heat transfer from a cylinder? T∞ TS = TR R conduction to surface Tc L conduction & convection from surface
Biot Number (Bi) If Bi<0.1, we can neglect internal resistance (5%) If Bi >0.1, we should account for radial variations (low external resistance or high internal resistance) cylinder:
Cooling of Cylindrical Body: Assume Radial Symmetry We wish to find how temperature varies in the solid body as a function of radial position and time. Evaluate equation term by term h R T TR T(r,t) Apply assumptions: Apply boundary & initial conditions:
Cooling of a CylinderCenterline Temperature vs. Time Assuming Centerline Temperature = Rectal Temperature: Design a procedure to find the time of death from this chart x1 = R; = (k/ρCp)body; m = 1/2Bi = kbody/hR
Using the Graphical Solution to Estimate the Time of Death. Core Temperature at 5:30 AM = 91.1°F (Tc-T∞)/(T0-T∞)=(91.1-65)/(98.6-65)=0.777 m=k/hR=0.5/(100 x .15) = 0.033 Fo = 0.12 t = FoR2/ = (.12)(.15m)2/(.54x10-3 m2/hr) = 5 hr Time of death = 12:30 AM +/- Guilty!
Should the Defense Rest? Are there any other confounding factors? Different radius Different h Not a cylinder
Module Summary • Models are valuable for predicting important biomedical phenomena • Models are only as accurate as the information provided and the validity of the assumptions made.