1 / 16

Data publishing in the context of the ICSU World Data System (WDS)

Data publishing in the context of the ICSU World Data System (WDS). Michael Diepenbroek MARUM, University Bremen. Geosciences development. William Smith, 1815. Glomar challenger , 1875. Alfred Wegener, 1929. Turin papyrus, ~1160 bChr. Technical development. Magnetometer. ENIAC, 1944.

lyre
Télécharger la présentation

Data publishing in the context of the ICSU World Data System (WDS)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Data publishing in the context of the ICSU World Data System (WDS) Michael Diepenbroek MARUM, University Bremen

  2. Geosciences development William Smith, 1815 Glomarchallenger, 1875 Alfred Wegener, 1929 Turin papyrus,~1160 bChr

  3. Technical development Magnetometer ENIAC, 1944

  4. Data Driven Science

  5. GEOSSGlobal Earth Observation System of Systems knowledge !? orientative knowledge information

  6. Why do we need libraries & publishing systems for scientific data? • Good scientific practice. • Prerequisite for the verification of scientific results. • Good data availability fosters large scale & complex science approaches. • „Data recycling“ is more effective than re-production. • General data availability is low compared to data production. • Available data are often not usable because the quality cannot be estimated. • Benefit to data producers (publications = science currency)

  7. Airglow • Mitaka,Japan • Rockets and Satellites • Obninsk, Russia • Astronomy • Beijing, China • Rotation of the Earth • Obninsk, Russia • Washington DC, USA • Atmospheric Trace Gases • Oak Ridge TN, USA • Satellite Information • Greenbelt MD, USA • Aurora • Tokyo, Japan • Seismology • Denver CO, USA • Beijing, China • Cosmic Rays • Toyokawa, Japan • Soils • Wageningen, The Netherlands • Earth Tides • Brussels, Belgium • Solar Activity • Meudon, France • Geology • Beijing, China • Solar Radio Emission • Nagano, Japan • Geomagnetism • Copenhagen, Denmark • Edinburgh, UK • Kyoto, Japan • Colaba, India • Solar Terrestrial Physics • Boulder CO, USA • Didcot Oxon, UK • Moscow, Russia • Haymarket, Australia • Glaciology • Boulder CO, USA • Cambridge, UK • Lanzhou, China • Solid Earth Geophysics • Beijing, China • Boulder CO, USA • Moscow, Russia • Oceaography • Obninsk, Russia • Silver Spring MD, USA • Tianjin, China • Recent Crustal Movements • Ondrejov, Czech Republic • Human Interactions in the Environment • Palisades NY, USA • Space Science • Beijing, China • Sunspot Index • Brussels, Belgium • Remotely Sensed Land Data • Sioux Falls SD, USA • Ionosphere • Tokyo, Japan • Space Science Satellites • Kanagawa, Japan • Marine Environmental Sciences • Germany, (2001) • Paleoclimatology • Boulder CO, USA • Renewable Resources and Environment • Beijing, China ICSU World Data Centers (WDC)Geophysical Year 1957 • Meteorology • Asheville NC, USA • Beijing, China • Obninsk, Russia • Marine Geology and Geophysics • Boulder CO, USA • Moscow, Russia • Nuclear Radiation • Tokyo, Japan WDC Co-ordination Offices Washington DC, USA Beijing, China

  8. Initial position of WDS Contra • Insufficient funding (of course) • Organisation and quality of data services are not consistent • IT development is fast – no time for legacies • Fragmentation of efforts Pro • Long standing experience & know how & motivation • Good context with science • Open access for all data resources • As a whole a very large global data management capacity • Trans-disciplinary !

  9. ICSU WDS - Roles & relations in a federatedsystem Scientific Communities & Other Stakeholders Related Networks & Programs GEOSS, GMES, WMO-IS, IOC etc Metadata & Data Services web portals, catalogues Visualisation & Analysis computesystems, virtuallabs, GIS systems Publisherscommercial, open access (e.g. ESSD journal),crossreferencing Libraries DOI registryinterdiscipl. catalogues Data Archiving & PublicationFacilitiescertifiedrepositories Education & Outreach Data Collection & Processing FacilitiesQA/QC, dataproducts, also datarescue Research Institutionsuniversities, researchinstitutes Research Facilitiessattelites, vessels, observatories, alert systems etc. Research Projects / Programsnational, EU, international

  10. Publishing workflows - asynchron

  11. Publishing workflow - synchronized

  12. Registration & dissemination

  13. Cross-referencing I

  14. Cross-referencing II

  15. Editorial systems & peer review

  16. WDS - further planning • Survey collecting responses from interested parties • Preliminary results indicate that the consortium will partly change • Active recruitment of new candidates • Certification & accreditation of old & new facilities • Catalogue of criteria, workflows, structures (OAIS) • Certification authority (CA) • Relationships with GEOSS, WMO-IS, DataCite • Web site, service platform (data portal, ticket system) • International Project Office (IPO) by end of 2010 • Operational end of 2011

More Related