1 / 9

Status of XMM-Newton cross-calibration using SASv10.0 Madrid, 24. March 2010

Status of XMM-Newton cross-calibration using SASv10.0 Madrid, 24. March 2010. Example: 1H0414+009. SW modes without pile-up. Absorbed single power law model. Examples: Recent observations. SW modes with pile-up. PKS2155-304: Absorbed broken power law model.

lyre
Télécharger la présentation

Status of XMM-Newton cross-calibration using SASv10.0 Madrid, 24. March 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status of XMM-Newton cross-calibration using SASv10.0 Madrid, 24. March 2010 M.Stuhlinger, March 2010

  2. Example: 1H0414+009 SW modes without pile-up. Absorbed single power law model. M.Stuhlinger, March 2010

  3. Examples: Recent observations SW modes with pile-up. PKS2155-304: Absorbed broken power law model. 3C273: Absorbed double power law model. M.Stuhlinger, March 2010

  4. Example: Galaxy clusters FF modes. Absorbed plasma model (mekal). A2029: kT ~ 7.2 keV A262: kT ~ 2.2 keV M.Stuhlinger, March 2010

  5. Statistical evaluation: Flux distributions M.Stuhlinger, March 2010 M. Stuhlinger

  6. Statistical evaluation: Time evolution M.Stuhlinger, March 2010

  7. Statistical evaluation: Flux distribution 2XMM MOS1/pn MOS2/pn Matteo Guainazzi M.Stuhlinger, March 2010

  8. Statistical evaluation: Time evolution 2XMM MOS1/pn MOS2/pn Matteo Guainazzi M.Stuhlinger, March 2010

  9. Summary • Statistical analyses of XCAL archive (dominated by piled-up SW observations) • and 2XMM sample (285 pile-up free FF observations) are consistent. • Significant spread between single observations in nearly all energy bands, • both for fluxes and slopes. • EPICs show only weak flux time evolution for higher energies (>0.85 keV), • some evolution is seen at lower energies (<0.85 keV). • RGS and EPIC fluxes diverge with time at low energies. • Nearly no time evolution of EPIC/RGS slopes in any of the energy bands. M.Stuhlinger, March 2010

More Related