1 / 14

Trolley Case Study Overview: March, 2003 CO 2 Emissions Reduction Potential for Santiago, Chile

Trolley Case Study Overview: March, 2003 CO 2 Emissions Reduction Potential for Santiago, Chile. Center for Clean Air Policy (CCAP) Cambio Climatico y Desarrollo (CC&D) International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Funded by: Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) .

lysandra
Télécharger la présentation

Trolley Case Study Overview: March, 2003 CO 2 Emissions Reduction Potential for Santiago, Chile

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Trolley Case Study Overview: March, 2003CO2 Emissions Reduction Potential for Santiago, Chile Center for Clean Air Policy (CCAP) Cambio Climatico y Desarrollo (CC&D) International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Funded by: Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA)

  2. Why Consider Electric Trolleys? • Recommended by Steering Committee as a potential project in need of further analysis • Benefits vs. diesel buses • No ground-level emissions • Reduced maintenance costs & noise • Potential to reduce CO2 emissions • Santiago has access to clean source of electricity

  3. Range of Key Variables

  4. Key Operational Variables

  5. 1. Cost Comparisons • Step 1: Utilized a spreadsheet tool to compare costs of articulated diesel buses to articulated trolleys • Included capital and operating costs • Annualized all costs

  6. Annual Capital & Operating Costs

  7. 2. Energy Use • Step 2: Calculated energy use • Diesel: based on measurements in Santiago • Assumed articulated buses use 20% more energy • Trolley: based on manufacturer data (SKODA)

  8. 3. CO2 Emissions • Step 3: Calculated CO2 emissions • Electric Trolleys = estimates for Santiago’s electric emissions (SIC grid) • Assumed a range of generation mixes • Calculated emissions based on generation estimates • Diesel Buses = Used standard factor

  9. 2010 Estimated Electricity Emissions for Santiago

  10. 4. Cost per ton CO2 • Step 4: Estimated the Cost per tCO2 • Based upon a range of cost variables for trolleys & diesel buses • Framed a range of potential CO2 reductions from the use of electric trolleys

  11. Range of CO2 Benefits From Electric Trolley

  12. Range of CO2 Benefits From Electric Trolley – 100% Hydro

  13. Conclusions: Electric Trolleys • Low CO2 benefits, high costs • 100% hydro-power increases CO2 benefits, but still expensive • Air quality, health and noise benefits not quantified • Trolley technology may be more attractive to passengers than buses

  14. Fin? Source: http://www.tbus.org.uk/gallery.htm

More Related