1 / 6

Comprehensive Evaluation of HILT2: Enhancing Resource Accessibility and User Experience

The HILT2 evaluation encompasses five critical areas: current indexing policies, user needs and information-seeking behavior, identification of relevant collections, vocabulary mapping, and cost-benefit analysis of future terminology servers. It emphasizes the necessity for a centralized, classified catalog that reflects comprehensive indexing to facilitate efficient resource discovery. The report highlights sustainable practices for long-term indexing strategies and the importance of local subject systems to enhance user access. For detailed insights, refer to the full evaluation report at our provided link.

mac
Télécharger la présentation

Comprehensive Evaluation of HILT2: Enhancing Resource Accessibility and User Experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluation of HILT 2 Leonard Will Willpower Information <http://www.willpowerinfo.co.uk>

  2. HILT2 covered five major topics • Indexing policies of existing resources • Users' needs and information-seeking behaviour • Identifying collections and resources relevant to any given topic • Mapping between vocabularies • Cost-benefit analysis of possible future "terminology server" systems.

  3. A central catalogue of resources We need a central classified catalogue of resources (IESR; collections finder; browse tree) The alphabetical index to the classified catalogue should reflect its contents and contain all terms likely to be sought (disambiguation facility; UK Oriented Scheme Modifications Registry; mappings from other thesauri) Sustainability for the long term?

  4. Mapping compound concepts Not “teeth” but “effect of fluoridation of water supplies on tooth decay in children” Many-to-many; pre- and post-coordination Not reversible: A = “(X or Y) and Z” Investigate further before investing in major mapping or terminology service implementation work.

  5. Need to use local subject systems If resource centres use a common scheme, then we can provide direct access to individual items If not, switch enquirers from the central catalogue into the local subject systems of relevant collections Specialist terms and hierarchies cannot be mapped to from a more general scheme

  6. Link to the full evaluation report <http://hilt.cdlr.strath.ac.uk/hilt2web/ finalreport/Kevaluation.doc/>

More Related