1 / 1

Robot -assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience

No. 191. Robot -assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience. Kevin Lah 1 , Devang Desai 1 , Charles Chabert 2 , Troy Gianduzzo 1,2 1 Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Queensland, Australia 2 Wesley Private Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

macy
Télécharger la présentation

Robot -assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. No. 191 Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial experience Kevin Lah1, Devang Desai1, Charles Chabert2, Troy Gianduzzo1,2 1 Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Queensland, Australia 2 Wesley Private Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Posters Proudly Supported by: Results 9 cases , median age 70 years (57 – 74). 5 males and 4 females, 6 left and 3 right sided lesions. Median lesion size was 2.5 cm (1.3 – 5). This included a 5 cm heminephrectomy as the third case of the series (Fig 1). There were 8 exophytic and 1 endophytic lesions. Median operating time was 180 mins (180 – 260). Median warm ischaemia time was 13 mins (8 – 13). There were no intensive care admissions, no transfusions and no open conversions. One patient had a transient, self-limiting neuralgia (ClavienDindo grade 1). Postoperative renal function was within normal limits at 6 months follow up. Introduction The ready transition to robotic prostatectomy for surgeons with an established background in laparoscopic prostatectomy is well described. Similarly international series suggest a short learning curve for surgeons undertaking robotic partial nephrectomy, who are already proficient in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Aim To report the initial robot-assisted partial nephrectomy experience of 2 fellowship-trained surgeons established in laparoscopic partial nephrectomyin an Australian context. • Methods • Prospective database - robot-assisted partial nephrectomy • Placement of an ipsilateral ureteric catheter • Transperitoneal- 4 arm approach - da Vinci S • Renal hilum was dissected, kidney defatted, colonic mobilisation. • Intra-operative ultrasound used to assist tumour margin • Renal artery and vein seperately clamped – Scanlan robotic bulldog clamps • Tumour excised - cold scissor dissection • Collecting system defects repaired - integrity assessed with retrograde instillation of methylene blue • Renorrhaphy- 2/0 V-locsuture • Vascular clamps released - bleeding vessels suture ligated • Cortical reconstruction - single, running horizontal mattress 12 inch 0/0 V-LOC suture. Floseal applied. Conclusions In this series, initial oncological and peri-operative outcomes comparable to mature multi-institutional series were achieved. These outcomes suggest a smooth transition to robotic partial nephrectomy for surgeons who have an established background in advanced, complex laparoscopy. Fig 1. 5 cm renal mass Acknowledgements References Rogers et al. (2008). Robotic partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional analysis. J Robotic Surg 2(3):141-143.

More Related