1 / 11

THE LAW OF HIGHER EDUCATION - EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT

THE LAW OF HIGHER EDUCATION - EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT. Dennis Farrington Ljubljana, March 2014. My introduction. Civil servant 1972-1981, mainly in Northern Ireland University administration UK 1981-2002 Working for SEEU since 2002 Expert, Council of Europe etc since 1994

Télécharger la présentation

THE LAW OF HIGHER EDUCATION - EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. THE LAW OF HIGHER EDUCATION - EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL CONTEXT Dennis Farrington Ljubljana, March 2014

  2. My introduction • Civil servant 1972-1981, mainly in Northern Ireland • University administration UK 1981-2002 • Working for SEEU since 2002 • Expert, Council of Europe etc since 1994 • SEEU project since 2000 • 14 countries, major projects Kosovo, BiH, etc • Recent work Armenia, Moldova, Ukraine (current)

  3. H.E. LAW BASICS 1 • Council of Europe LRP Template 1998/2000 as amended over time • EUA Trends Reports • New issues since 2000: • Bologna Process • Response to new technologies • Academic freedom and autonomy in the ‘wired world’ • Managed HEIs v collegially- run HEIs

  4. BASICS 2 • Ensuring cost-effective use of public funds in the new economic reality • Using external expertise in governance • Optimising the student experience – less emphasis on theory, more on competences • Facilitating flexible HR policies • Diversifying income streams • Commercialisation and exploitation of research

  5. BASICS 3 • Risk assessment and audit • Key Performance Indicators • Depoliticising public higher education • Dealing with reality: private and public-private institutions including branches of foreign institutions

  6. SO: • Any new higher education law in any country has to be simple, flexible, and progressive • Maximum autonomy has to be given to well-governed, well-managed institutions, perhaps through framework agreements • Public funding for highly specialised courses (medicine etc) can continue to be based on state estimates, otherwise the market decides

  7. RECENT WORK • Armenia: improving autonomy, modernisation of Laws of 1999 and 2004 • Moldova: modernisation of Education Code dated 1995-1999 • Ukraine: moving from ‘Soviet’ system to modern European system, modernisation of Laws 1996-2002

  8. THE UNITED KINGDOM • Four increasingly diverse higher education systems (E, S, W, NI) • About 160 universities, all technically private corporations, not all publicly-funded • With at least five different types of foundation: • Royal Charter/Papal Bull/sometimes confirmed by statute (eg Universities of Oxford & Cambridge Act 1571, older Scottish Universities: Acts of Union 1707) • Acts of Parliament, public and private • Higher education corporations • Companies limited by guarantee (non-profit) • Companies limited by shares (usually for profit) • Trusts/religious foundations, e.g. two recent RC universities

  9. CONCENTRATE ON ENGLAND • New types of providers granted power to award degrees (private companies, further education colleges) and ‘university’ does not necessarily have to award PhD (contrast with Scotland) • Most funding for teaching now comes via the Student Loans Company, not the Funding Council • Difficult, actually unlawful, under existing legislation (1992, as amended) to regulate activity not funded by the Funding Council • New concentration on consumers, value for money

  10. PROPOSALS FOR NEW LAW • ‘Level playing field’ for all types of providers • Dealing more effectively with ‘consumers’ • Allowing for new organisational forms • New regulatory framework not reliant on source of funding • But probably not saying anything about the Bologna Process or sorting out the wide variety of qualifications and nomenclature

  11. Q & A • Thanks!

More Related