1 / 25

M. Palutan, T. Spadaro, P. Valente Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati

Status of the analysis of K S semileptonic decays Update on BR ( K S  p - p + )/ BR ( K S  p 0 p 0 ). M. Palutan, T. Spadaro, P. Valente Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati. C. Gatti Università Statale di Pisa  Università di Roma “La Sapienza”. e + p - n H WK  K 0  = a + b

maddock-walters
Télécharger la présentation

M. Palutan, T. Spadaro, P. Valente Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Status of the analysis of KS semileptonic decaysUpdate on BR(KS p-p+)/BR(KS p0p0) M. Palutan, T. Spadaro, P. Valente Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati C. Gatti Università Statale di Pisa  Università di Roma “La Sapienza”

  2. e+p-nHWKK0 = a+b e-p+nHWKK0 = a*-b* e-p+nHWKK0 = c+d e+p-nHWKK0 = c*-d* Physics motivations • Two clean predictions within the Standard Model: • Transition rates: G(KS  pen) = G(KL  pen)  DS=DQ rule • Charge asymmetries: AS = AL CPT symmetry eS = eK+dK eL = eK-dK CPT violation in decay CPT violation in mixing

  3. Test of the DS=DQ rule. The relevant parameter is: e+p-nHWKK0 Re x+ Re c*/a  KLOE statistical error on Re x+ e+p-nHWKK0 KLOE 2000: Phys. Lett. B535 (2002) (assuming d=0) CPLEAR measurement (-1.86.1)10-3 GSsemi = 1 + 4 Re x+ GLsemi BR(KSpen) tL BR(KLpen) tS BR and DS=DQ rule (I) Re x+ can be extracted by measuring the ratio of semileptonic KS and KL decay widths summing up both charge final states 810-3 710-3 110-3

  4. Charge asymmetry (I) G+S,L - G-S,L AS,L = G+S,L + G-S,L AS = 2Re eK + 2Re dK+ 2Re b/a - 2Re d*/a AL = 2Re eK - 2Re dK+ 2Re b/a + 2Re d*/a No measurement CP CPT in mixing CPT in decay DSDQ and CPT AS -AL0 implies CPT (AS +AL  4Re eK) Re dK = (2.9  2.7) 10-4 CPLEARPhys Lett B444 52 (1998)

  5. Charge asymmetry (II) G+S,L - G-S,L AS,L = G+S,L + G-S,L • 3 levels of accuracy can be considered: • In order to test if AS is consistent with 2Re eK , need 2 fb-1 • In order to measure AS with O(30%) significance, need 20 fb-1 • In order to improve limits on dK=(AS – AL)/4 , need 50 fb-1 • + precise measurement ofALe from KTeV ALe = (3322  58stat  47syst ) 10-6 KTeV Phys Rev Lett 88 (2002) KLOE is able to improve on the measurement ofALe, using the whole 500 pb–1 data set

  6. t+ p+0BR+- MK02 tSp+-BR+0 MK+2 1 + 1/ w2 =(1+p+-/ p00R) 1 + w2/2 + w 2 cos(d0-d2 ) R p00/p+- = 1 + 2 w2-w 22 cos(d0-d2 ) KS p+p- and KS p0p0 decays Both the isospin (I=0 and 2) amplitudes and the pp phase-shifts can be estimated from the measured K pp branching ratios: A(K0 p+p-) = A0 eid0+ 2A2 eid2 A(K0 p0p0) = A0 eid0- A2 eid2/2 A(K+ p+p0) = 3/2 A2 eid2

  7. KS p+p- and KS p0p0 decays • Using the PDG values for the branching ratios, one gets: • d0-d2  (56.73.8) (and w=0.045) • This value is inconsistent with the prediction from O(p2) cpT (456), the measurement from pp scattering (45.21.3 1.5), and the estimate from the KL decays • With the KLOE published measurement of • R = G(KS p+p-)/G(KS p0p0)=2.239 based on 17 pb-1 • (R = 2.1857 PDG): • d0-d2  (483)(while w is unchanged) • In pipeline, planned for mid 2003: • Measurement of R with an error of 10-3 • Measurement of both the absolute branching ratios

  8. KS beam KL • A pure KS beam can be selected by identifying the KL in the opposite hemisphere  KS tag • Due to the very different lifetimes lS  0.6 cm, lL 350 cm, a very efficient tag is given by KL’s that reach the calorimeter and interact therein (Kcrash) • ecrash 30% • The Kcrash cluster is cleanly identified by its low velocity, b  0.2, as measured from the time of the e+e- interaction (t0). • This also provides an estimate of the KL direction (s  2) and momentum (s  3MeV) Pf KS

  9. Ks beam KSp0p0 Events tagged by a ‘Kcrash’ cluster KSp+p- Looser cut on b*, from (0.195, 0.2475) to (0.17, 0.28) Higher tagging efficiency, from 0.3 to 0.35 at 100 MeV Lower systematic error in the estimate of the ratio of p+p-/p0p0 and p+p-/pen tagging efficiencies, especially for Kcrash energy cut above 200 MeV

  10. Measurement method ‘Kcrash’ cluster N a BR(KS a) ea =  N b BR(KS b) eb Events tagged by a ‘Kcrash’ cluster p p Selection of KSp+p- events 2 tracks close to the IP, impact on the EmC At least one track associated to an EmC “T0” cluster (0.2% loss) Less than 3 prompt EmC clusters, not associated to any track (0.08% loss)

  11. Measurement method ‘Kcrash’ cluster N a BR(KS a) ea =  KL N b BR(KS b) eb Events tagged by a ‘Kcrash’ cluster e boost p KS Selection of KSpen events 2 tracks and 1 vertex close to the IP, to EmC n Reject events with invariant mass Mpp close to the K0 mass Use time information from calorimeter clusters to perform PID for charged tracks

  12. p/e identification • Time of flight e/p identification (Dt  2 ns) : • dt(m) = tcluster – t.o.f.calculated with mass hypothesis m • Sign of the charge is determined  semileptonic asymmetry accessible e-p+ MC KS  p+p- MC KSpen Data pesignal dt(me1)dt(mp2) dt(me2)dt(mp1) 6 ns e+p-

  13. pen final selection Close the kinematics, by using: KLOE 2000: PLB B535 (2002) 1) e-p identification from t.o.f. 2) KS momentum from KL crash direction and momentum: N(pen) = 627  30 Emiss = ES - Ee- Ep Pmiss = |PS - p1- p2|

  14. Entries 62738 e+p- e-p+ Entries 48917 Data 166 pb-1 (2001) Emiss-Pmiss (MeV) Charge-selected pen spectra Form of signal distribution approximately independent of sign of charge

  15. e+p- e-p+ Data 166 pb-1 (2001) Charge-selected pen spectra Emiss-Pmiss (MeV) Substantial charge dependence of the KSp+p- background spectrum far away from the signal peak

  16. N(p-e+n) = 3854  92  Data 166 pb-1 (2001)  MC fit result c2/n.d.f = 1.5 Event yields by sign of charge Fitting to data unselected by charge gives a result compatible with the sum: N(pen)=7732127 N(p+e-n) = 3863  88  Data 166 pb-1 (2001)  MC fit result c2/n.d.f = 1.1

  17. Efficiency estimates (I) epen = e(fiducial cuts) e(t.c.a) e(t0trigger) e(t.o.f.) 1) “Natural” data control sample: KLpendecays close to the IP • 2) Correction obtained by weighting Monte Carlo kinematics with single-particle efficiencies extracted from data: • KSp +p- (p and m efficiencies) • fp +p- p0 (p and m efficiencies) • Radiative Bhabha (e efficiencies) • KLpen (p, m, and e efficiencies) Pion calorimeter clusters needed for t.o.f PID, correct parametrization of calorimeter response to low-energy (100 MeV) pions is therefore a crucial task

  18. Efficiency estimates (II) 3) Data control sample of KLp+p-p0decays to tag the KS (Rtag) • 4) Data control sample of KSp0p0 and KLpen close to the IP to study vertex efficiency: • The vertex requirement led to the biggest source of systematic error in the 2000 anaysis (1% uncertainty) • Official routine has 2% inefficiency. • A new recovery algorithm has been implemented, which releases the quality cuts of VTXMIN on the c2 (it just looks for a mimimum) • New vertex efficiency practically 100%

  19. Data of year 2000: branching ratio measurement e(fiducial cuts) = (29.70.5)% e(t.c.a.) = (92.50.6)% e(t0trigger) = (92.20.4)% e(t.o.f.) = (82.00.7)% epen= (20.80.4)% N(pen) = 627  30 N(p+p-) = 1.6106 Normalizing to the KS p+p- channel, one gets: BR(KS pen) = (6.910.37)10-4 From the KL semileptonic decay width and assuming Re x+=0,BR(KSpen)=(6.700.07)10-4 Published year 2000 result based on 17 pb-1 is 5 times more accurate than the only existing measurement

  20. Data of year 2001: efficiencies by charge Systematic and statistical uncertainties nearly equally contribute to the error on the pen total selection efficiency

  21. Data of year 2001: branching ratio measurement N(pen) = 7732  127 N(p+p-) = 21.354 106 epen = (23.170.14)% Normalizing to the KS p+p- channel, one gets: BR(KS pen) = (6.610.110.070.040.03)10-4 Statistical Fit syst Effi syst BR(pp) error From the KL semileptonic decay width and assuming Rex+=0, BR(KSpen)=(6.700.07)10-4 Result based on 166 pb-1 of 2001 data

  22. N+ e+-N- e- AS = N+ e++N- e- Charge asymmetry To get the asymmetry, one has to correct the e+p- and e-p+ event yields using the efficiencies for each sign of charge… Present PRELIMINARY result is based on 166 pb-1 AS = 0.012 0.017stat 0.004systwith an overall error of 2% BR(KS p-e+n) = (3.3300.0810.0330.0180.014)10-4 BR(KS p+e-n) = (3.2490.0760.0320.0170.013)10-4

  23. Conclusions and prospects on KSpen Present preliminary result for the branching ratio has an overall error of 2%, allowing an accuracy on Re(x) of 0.5% Present preliminary result (2001 data) for the charge asymmetry has an overall error of 2% and is compatible with 0 Work is needed to improve the MC simulation for the Emiss-Pmiss background spectrum • Full analysis of year 2001-2002 sample will allow measurement of: • Re x with an accuracy better than 5 10-3 • Charge asymmetry to within 1.%

  24. Status of KSp+p- / KSp0p0 • Selection efficiency for KSp+p- is evaluated by folding data/MC tracking, TCA, T0 efficiencies into the MC simulation • Efficiencies have been extracted for the whole 2001 sample and for a selected sample of 60 pb-1 of 2002 • Ratio of tagging efficiency with the new b* window is now stable at 0.1% level throughout the samples • Work is needed to address the selection efficiency for KSp0p0: • Photon efficiencies • Calorimeter response Run over the whole data set to check stability and to measure data/MC corrections over the entire detector • Effect of accidental clusters on the prompt counting

  25. Measurement method ‘Kcrash’ cluster N a BR(KS a) ea =  N b BR(KS b) eb g Events tagged by a ‘Kcrash’ cluster g g Selection of KSp0p0 events At least 3 prompt EmC clusters not associated to any track

More Related