1 / 13

Observer participation in the UNFCCC process

Observer participation in the UNFCCC process. The fourth session of the Meeting of the Parties to the Aarhus Convention Chisinau, Moldova, 29 June 2011. Table of Content. Levels of observer participation in UNFCCC process Conclusions of the SBI 34 Aarhus recommendations to UNFCCC

madeline-kosta
Télécharger la présentation

Observer participation in the UNFCCC process

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Observer participation in the UNFCCC process The fourth session of the Meeting of the Parties to the Aarhus Convention Chisinau, Moldova, 29 June 2011

  2. Table of Content • Levels of observer participation in UNFCCC process • Conclusions of the SBI 34 • Aarhus recommendations to UNFCCC • Conclusions

  3. Historical Participation levels of COPs/CMPs

  4. Observers only

  5. Cumulative number of admitted organizations

  6. Progress made by SBI 34 Conclusions of SBI 34 June 2011 (→) All Parties: • → National level stakeholder engagement Hosts of future COP/CMP: • Size of venues (2010) → recalled Aarhus recommendation (ii) • → Before and throughout the Presidency term

  7. Progress made by SBI 34 Presiding officers: • Contact Groups (1998) → first and last informal Aarhus recommendation (vi) • Workshops (2002, 2007) → presentations by observers • Briefings (2009) → welcome continuation → observers to better utilize as dialogue platform • Interventions (2004, 2007) → seek opportunities Aarhus recommendation (v)

  8. Progress made by SBI 34 The secretariat where appropriate: • Submissions on web (2004, 2010) → web accessibility • → Background documents The secretariat if resourced: • Technical means of participation (2007, 2010) → welcomed efforts, web redesign • → Name replacement during sessions exceptionally • → More webcast

  9. Progress made by SBI 34 SBI 36: • → Discuss options for new channels to formalize observer inputs Aarhus recommendation (xi)

  10. Progress made by SBI 34 Other issues discussed by SBI: • Guidelines for participation (2005) Aarhus recommendation (vii) • Financial support by interested Parties (2004) Aarhus recommendation (x) • Draft texts on the web Aarhus recommendation (iv) • Aarhus Convention and Almaty Guidelines upheld in UNFCCC’s well established practices (2007)

  11. Other Aarhus recommendations (i) Explicit roles in decision making → Mandates, HCA and ratified legal instruments (iii) Rooms not buildings → Online registration system → Tickets to plenary halls (viii) NGOs on Party delegation → On-going

  12. Other Aarhus recommendations (ix) Increase secretariat budget for observer participation → No increase for observer liaison team (xii) NGOs themselves need to get better organised → Enhanced organization observed (xiii) Interaction between UNFCCC and Aarhus Convention secretariats → UNFCCC in Aarhus workshops and the MOP → Aarhus secretariat’s practices shared → SBI 34 & report on the good practices of other UN processes

  13. Conclusions • Aarhus recommendations discussed and concluded • Up to the Parties, collectively and individually • Visible progress since 2004 discussions • Message from the SBI Chair • Continued exchange with the Aarhus Convention

More Related