130 likes | 246 Vues
Explore levels of observer participation, historical COPs/CMPs data, Aarhus recommendations, and progress made by SBI34 and SBI36 in engaging stakeholders. The text covers various areas of UNFCCC processes, from national stakeholder engagement to secretariat initiatives, with a focus on enhancing dialogue and participation.
E N D
Observer participation in the UNFCCC process The fourth session of the Meeting of the Parties to the Aarhus Convention Chisinau, Moldova, 29 June 2011
Table of Content • Levels of observer participation in UNFCCC process • Conclusions of the SBI 34 • Aarhus recommendations to UNFCCC • Conclusions
Progress made by SBI 34 Conclusions of SBI 34 June 2011 (→) All Parties: • → National level stakeholder engagement Hosts of future COP/CMP: • Size of venues (2010) → recalled Aarhus recommendation (ii) • → Before and throughout the Presidency term
Progress made by SBI 34 Presiding officers: • Contact Groups (1998) → first and last informal Aarhus recommendation (vi) • Workshops (2002, 2007) → presentations by observers • Briefings (2009) → welcome continuation → observers to better utilize as dialogue platform • Interventions (2004, 2007) → seek opportunities Aarhus recommendation (v)
Progress made by SBI 34 The secretariat where appropriate: • Submissions on web (2004, 2010) → web accessibility • → Background documents The secretariat if resourced: • Technical means of participation (2007, 2010) → welcomed efforts, web redesign • → Name replacement during sessions exceptionally • → More webcast
Progress made by SBI 34 SBI 36: • → Discuss options for new channels to formalize observer inputs Aarhus recommendation (xi)
Progress made by SBI 34 Other issues discussed by SBI: • Guidelines for participation (2005) Aarhus recommendation (vii) • Financial support by interested Parties (2004) Aarhus recommendation (x) • Draft texts on the web Aarhus recommendation (iv) • Aarhus Convention and Almaty Guidelines upheld in UNFCCC’s well established practices (2007)
Other Aarhus recommendations (i) Explicit roles in decision making → Mandates, HCA and ratified legal instruments (iii) Rooms not buildings → Online registration system → Tickets to plenary halls (viii) NGOs on Party delegation → On-going
Other Aarhus recommendations (ix) Increase secretariat budget for observer participation → No increase for observer liaison team (xii) NGOs themselves need to get better organised → Enhanced organization observed (xiii) Interaction between UNFCCC and Aarhus Convention secretariats → UNFCCC in Aarhus workshops and the MOP → Aarhus secretariat’s practices shared → SBI 34 & report on the good practices of other UN processes
Conclusions • Aarhus recommendations discussed and concluded • Up to the Parties, collectively and individually • Visible progress since 2004 discussions • Message from the SBI Chair • Continued exchange with the Aarhus Convention