1 / 25

Prevention Co-production of Levels Eve nt 2 nd April 2012

Prevention Co-production of Levels Eve nt 2 nd April 2012. Councillor Heather Smith. Prevention Consultation July – September 2011. Customers Providers Key stakeholders. What we found. Provider feedback - Opportunities. Customer Feedback Opportunities. Local combined community access

maisie
Télécharger la présentation

Prevention Co-production of Levels Eve nt 2 nd April 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Prevention Co-production of Levels Event2nd April 2012 Councillor Heather Smith

  2. Prevention Consultation July – September 2011 • Customers • Providers • Key stakeholders

  3. What we found Provider feedback - Opportunities Customer Feedback Opportunities • Local combined community access • Holistic approach to whole needs • A flexible and multi-skilled workforce • Improved working • Improvements for customers • Maximising funding and income • Partnership, structure, governance and accountability • Workplace development, learning and growth • Joint efficiencies • Local combined community access • Fear and anxiety about loss or changes to services • Loss of access specialist staff • Consultation process • Impaired customer experience • Loss of skill, knowledge and staff • Pace of change and transition • Partnership working • Anxiety – communities and funding • Anxiety – capacity and commissioning • Concern and hub approach Customer Feedback Risks Provider Feedback - Risks

  4. Summary of Recommendations to Cabinet • Extend Consultation for a further 3 months • Agree and support the development of area based/locality model(s) • Authorise interim contract extensions or variations • Approve the Draft Prevention and Demand Strategy for the County 2012 – 2016 for consultation. • Endorse a Fair and Equitable Funding methodology http://www.northamptonshire.gov.uk/prevention

  5. Prevention ConsultationPhase 2 – Interim results Janet Doran

  6. Prevention Consultation December – February 2012 • Strategy • Fair and Equitable Funding Model • Locality Decision making

  7. Interim Results • Awareness raising • Relating to 12 events • Over 300 participants at events • 1588 internet hits

  8. Outline of Consultation • Three areas • Draft Strategy • Local Governance • Funding methodology

  9. Results • Draft Strategy • 51% agreed with aims • 6% disagreed • 43% unsure/didn’t want to answer • Written responses • 13 responses • 7 agreed • 3 disagreed • 3 didn’t know

  10. Results Local Governance • Diverse responses • Service users & carers • Providers • GP/Health • District and Borough • Police

  11. Results Funding Methodology • 76% of participants understood the methodology • 24% of participants did not understand • 55% felt the methodology was Fair/fair in principle • 11% felt it was not fair • 34% Didn’t know

  12. Proposed Fair and Equitable Resource Allocation Methodology

  13. Domains / Themes Early Years / Children’s Centres Deprivation Community Safety Young People Communities Adults - Vulnerable and Older People Access - Rural Data sets for these Domains, see updated Fair and Equitable Funding Model Domains and Datasets document.

  14. The information from each dataset will contribute to the ranking for that Lower Level Super Output Area. • With rank 407 being the most in need and 1 being the least • An area will have a ranking for each Domain/Theme, • (Similar to the IMD Domains) • For Example: Daventry 008D - E01027013

  15. Example of Allocation of Funding per person + + + (AF) (C) (CS) Deprivation (D): (area population X area’s domain rank ) Access to Facilities (AF): (area population X area’s domain rank) (D) + + Communities (C): (area population X area’s domain rank) Community Safety (CS): (area population X area’s domain rank) + + + + + (VAOP) (YP) (EYCC) Adults (VAOP): (area population X area’s domain rank) Young People (YP): (area population X area’s domain rank) + + Early Years (EYCC): (area population X area’s domain rank) Unique LSOA Figure = This figure is created for each of the 407 Lower super output areas.

  16. Total Funding Countywide Unit amount Countywide Unit amount = All 407 of the = Each area’s Funding X Each area’s Funding Unique LSOA Figure Funding per person within that area = That area’s population Unique LSOA Figure

  17. + + + (AF) (C) (CS) (D) + + + (VAOP) (YP) (EYCC) Unique LSOA Figure = Area 1 - 1000 + 2000 + 3000 + 2000 + 2000 + 3000 + 1000 = 14000

  18. All of the 5 Unique LSOA Figures added together The Countywide Unit amount Total Funding = All the unique LSOA figures added is: 47750 Therefore “Countywide” unit amount = £10,000,000 / 47750 £209.42

  19. Each LSOA Funding The Countywide Unit Amount X = For our example Unique LSOA Figure

  20. Each area’s Funding Funding per person within that area = That area’s population

  21. Co-production of Levels

  22. Levels/Tiers Level 5 • Critical (FACS) Level 4 • Greater Substantial (FACS) Adults Intermediate care/reablement • Additional needs regarding SPEC or statutory integrated response inc. Safeguarding (CYP) Edge of Care/Custody Level 3 • Additional needs specialist (CYP) • Lesser substantial (FACS) Adults • Targeted Prevention Services Level 2 • Early Response • Moderate (FACS) Adults • Short Term/low level Level 1 • Universal • Low (FACS) Adults

  23. Co-production of Levels - Workshops Universal Specialist

More Related