1 / 32

Optimizing VLT Sky: Proposal Submission Trends & Telescope Allocation Analysis

Analysis of 806 proposals for La Silla and Paranal LPs in 2004, comparing submission methods, arrival trends, country distribution, and telescope time allocation. Insights on pressure prediction across different telescopes and proposal categories.

maja
Télécharger la présentation

Optimizing VLT Sky: Proposal Submission Trends & Telescope Allocation Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. P74: a first view • VISAS - ODG ESO Faculty meeting, 6 April 2004

  2. Call and Proposal submission No more PostScript, PDF only PDF: smaller & searchable

  3. Totals P74 806 proposals received for La Silla and Paranal 14 Large Programs (Paranal 13, La Silla 1) 2 submitted via email!

  4. Proposal arrivals vs. Time (P74) Number Days

  5. Proposal arrivals vs. Time (P74) Number Days

  6. Country distribution (P74) 54% Fellows + students

  7. Paranal vs. La Silla Number

  8. Scientific areas (P74) LS LS LS LS Number P P P P

  9. Optimizing the community: the VLT sky

  10. Optimizing the community: the VLT sky

  11. Optimizing the community: the VLT sky

  12. Optimizing the community: the VLT sky

  13. Total Available vs. Total Requested “Available” in this presentation means always 182 nights!

  14. Predicting trouble: UT1

  15. Real life P74: UT1 For real pressure multiply by ~2 (technical time + ongoing LPs + carryovers)

  16. Predicting trouble: UT2

  17. Real life P74: UT2 For real pressure multiply by ~2 (technical time + ongoing LPs + carryovers)

  18. Predicting trouble: UT3

  19. Real life P74: UT3 For real pressure multiply by ~2 (technical time + ongoing LPs + carryovers)

  20. Real life P74: UT3 DARK TIME ~18 times available time!! For real pressure multiply by ~2 (technical time + ongoing LPs + carryovers)

  21. Predicting trouble: UT4

  22. Real life P74: UT4 For real pressure multiply by ~2 (technical time + ongoing LPs + carryovers)

  23. Real life 3.6: P74 For real pressure multiply by ~2 (technical time + ongoing LPs + carryovers)

  24. Real life NTT: P74 For real pressure multiply by ~2 (technical time + ongoing LPs + carryovers)

  25. Real life 2.2: P74 For real pressure multiply by ~2 (technical time + ongoing LPs + carryovers)

  26. Real life 2.2: P74 DARK TIME MPIA time For real pressure multiply by ~2 (technical time + ongoing LPs + carryovers)

  27. Telescope time allocation

  28. The community UT4 UT3 UT2 UT1 NTT SEST Number of proposals 2.2 m 1.4 Cat 1.5 Dan 0.9 Dut 3.6 m Now 1977

  29. TaToo, the scheduler

  30. TaToo, the scheduler

  31. TaToo, the scheduler

  32. TaToo, the scheduler

More Related