1 / 29

Geometry: An Introduction

Geometry: An Introduction. Sept 11 and 13, 2007. van Hiele Levels. Sequential development (like Piaget) Experience-based (not-like Piaget) Geometric experience = advancement Both instruction and language should be developmentally appropriate

mallorie
Télécharger la présentation

Geometry: An Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Geometry: An Introduction Sept 11 and 13, 2007

  2. van Hiele Levels • Sequential development (like Piaget) • Experience-based (not-like Piaget) • Geometric experience = advancement • Both instruction and language should be developmentally appropriate • Students typically learn algorithms/definitions without experiencing the concept

  3. Level 1: Visualization • Sorting and classifying • Examples • Triangles vs. non-triangles • Shapes with all straight sides vs others • Constructions with… • Geoboards- Virtual geoboard • Tessellations with pattern blocks • Pentominoes

  4. Level 1: Visualization • Shape Hunts • Around the school find as many different two-dimensional shapes as possible • Draw pictures, take photos with a digital camera

  5. Level 1: Visualization • Location bingo • Develops students sense of direction • Every placement is dependent on the previous placement • Put a square under the circle. • Put a triangle to the right of the square. • Put a kite above the triangle. • Fill in the rest of your grid with shapes from auto shapes on the drawing tool bar. • What would clues be for the rest of the shapes?

  6. Level 2: Analysis • Shapes are a collection of properties • Sorting by properties of 2-D or 3-D shapes • Right triangles vs non-right triangles • Quadrilateral sort Squares Rhombus Rectangles Trapezoids Quadrilaterals Kites Parallelogram What similarities do you notice??? What differences?

  7. Level 2: Analysis • Sorting by characteristics of 3-D shapes • Faces, vertices, edges Shapes with 6 faces, 8 vertices and 12 edges Shapes with a circular base

  8. Level 3: Informal Deduction (Abstraction) • MDL’s- “minimal defining lists” • Minimal: if anything is removed the definition is incorrect • Defining- any object with this definition must be that shape • a square= quadrilateral with 4 right angles and 4 congruent sides 1 2 3 triangle with one right angle a right triangle = 1 2 Write an MDL for a rectangle and for a parallelogram.

  9. Level 3: Informal Deduction (Abstraction) • Shape decomposition (Draw lines on the shapes using the Drawing toolbar) • Start with an isosceles triangle • Make two shapes that have 7 total sides • Make three shapes that have 11 total sides • Start with a regular hexagon • Make two shapes that have 8 total sides • Make two shapes that have 9 total sides • Start with a square • Make three triangles- two of the three need to be congruent

  10. Level 3: Informal Deduction (Abstraction) Answer each question with: always, sometimes or never • Triangles have one right angle. • Squares are rectangles. • Quadrilaterals are rectangles. • Parallelograms have a right angle. • Trapezoids have a right angle.

  11. Beyond Level Three • Level Four- Deduction • Students can work through proofs, understand axioms, theories and definitions • Level Five- Rigor • Fluent at proofs, sophisticated geometry- “proofs through the contrapositive”

  12. van Hiele Levels and Cognitively-appropriate Manipulative Levels

  13. Let’s guess…. • What percentage of entering high school geometry students are Level

  14. Data-driven Instruction: An Introduction September 11 and 13, 2007

  15. How would you grade… • A) 30 basic facts problems • B) 10 computational problems involving the use of an algorithm • C) A PWC task that involves computation and drawing a picture • D) A Doing Mathematics task that requires identifying an approach, finding a solution, and explaining the approach and solution

  16. Basic Facts

  17. Computational work

  18. Procedures with Connections

  19. Doing Mathematics

  20. Various Types of Assessment • Norm-referenced • Criterion-referenced • Performance-based

  21. Various Types of Assessment • Norm-referenced • Purpose • Compare students’ performance to other students • Format • Multiple choice • Scoring • Compared to other students’ scores (percentiles) • 99th percentile = scored better than 99% of other students • Can all students score in the 99th percentile? • Examples • Iowa Test of Basic Skills • Stanford 9 Test

  22. Creating Assessments • Norm-referenced • National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) What would you classify this task as? How could you make this PWC or DM?

  23. Variance Types of Assessments • Criterion-referenced • Purpose • Measures students’ mastery of standards and criteria • Format • Typically multiple choice exams • Scoring • Compared to “expected” score • E.g., 400 possible points, >300 = advanced, 200-299 = proficient • Can all students be proficient? • Examples • State assessments • North Carolina End of Grade (EOG) test

  24. Creating Assignments • Criterion-referenced Suggestions for making this PWC or DM?

  25. Various Types of Assessment • Performance-based • Purpose • Assess students’ ability to perform or complete tasks related to concepts and skills • Format • Tasks- multiple-choice, short answer, multi-part • Scoring • Rubric based • Scores are compared: pre-test, post-test; benchmarks • Can all students score above the benchmark? • Examples • Illinois State Mathematics Exam • Balanced Assessment in Mathematics- link

  26. Creating Assessments • Performance-based • Merging between higher-order thinking skills and content • Actions- analyzing, evaluating, explaining, synthesizing • North Carolina levels of thinking- link • How do these levels of thinking align to constructivist beliefs about teaching and learning?

  27. Assessment Questions • Multiple choice • Question (stem) • Answer choices • Typically three to four choices • In numerical or alphabetical order • Wrong answers are plausible (common errors) • Multiple-Multiple Choice • Question • Answer choices • More than one choice can be correct

  28. Can multiple choice questions… • Assess students’ higher-order thinking skills? • Why or why not? • How can you compose multiple choice questions that extend beyond recall of basic knowledge?

  29. Assessing Students’ Work • A brief introduction to rubrics • Within each task select… • Components of the task • For each component criteria of an exemplar answer • Determine point values for each component • Let’s look at some examples…

More Related