1 / 15

Enhancing Subsea Production System Reliability through API RP 17N Revision

The revision of API RP 17N focuses on improving subsea production system reliability, integrating technical risk and integrity management. The agenda includes introducing integrity management into current practices, recognizing synergies with other industry initiatives, and responding to recent experiences. Key components involve detailing progress on design, manufacturing, operation, and technology qualification while adding broader integrity considerations across all stages, from concept to operation. The collaborative effort from notable members aims to set a new tone that emphasizes integrity alongside production maximization.

mallory-berry
Télécharger la présentation

Enhancing Subsea Production System Reliability through API RP 17N Revision

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Revision of API RP 17NSubsea Production System Reliability, Technical Risk & Integrity Management Don Wells (Hess)

  2. Agenda • Introduction • Membership • General Plans / Progress • Detail Progress • Integration 17 Committee/ISO

  3. Introduction • Incorporate Integrity Management into current API 17N …Subsea Reliability and Technical Risk Management • Recognize and incorporate integration with other Industry initiatives • Incorporate updates based on feedback from using existing 17N document • Respond to recent industry experiences

  4. Membership • Organized into subcommittees • Design and Decommission • Manufacture, Assembly, SIT, Installation, Commissioning • Operations • Technology Qualification • Regulations • Room for additional membership • Opportunity to Make a Difference

  5. Membership • Graeme Davies – DNV • John Fassero – ExxonMobil • Karl Woods – Woodside • Martha Viteri – DNV • Michael Taylor – FMC • MzahidMamot – Petronas • Paul Kefford – Chevron • Reza Mostofi – DNV • Ronald Pechacek – NASA – United Space Alliance • Stephen May – Cameron • Mike Theobald – Maersk Oil • Karina Vitale – Chevron • Runar Østebø –Statoil • Jason Strouse – National Coupling • Anibal Dam – BP • John Macneill – Stress Engineering • Chairman 2012 • Don Wells – Hess • Co-Chairman • John Allen - GE • Mark Siegmund – BP • Champion • John Strutt - Astrimar • Record Keeper • Adriana Botto – Wood Group I.M. Membership • Lars Buus - DNV • David Valentine – NASA – United Space Alliance • Denver Roopchand – Atkins • Dane Tipton – National Coupling • Fuad Ahmad – Petronas • James Cencula – GE

  6. Mandate / Goals • Add Integrity Management to Current Document • Incorporate into all existing KPs & Stages from Concept to Installation / Commissioning • Add an Operations Stage / Section • Change Tone from Production to Integrity • Current tine reflects maximizing production • Will add Broader Integrity • Environment, etc. • Decide on Prescriptive vs. Safety Case • Ensure Tie-in with other API documents • i.e. API 17 V

  7. General Progress • 2010 – 2011 • Storming and forming - Complete • Gap Analysis – Mostly Complete • Added Runar Østebø – Statoil & convener of ISO/TC67 WG4 • 2012 - Planned • Define Tone (prescriptive / recommend) • Work the Gaps • Work the Interfaces • Industry Peer Assist Workshop (SURF IM Forum)

  8. Detailed Progress • Define Scope _ • Define Charter _ • Divide and Conquer…..Regular Subcommittee meetings 1. Design and Decommission • New Key Process (KP) for Through Life under development • Does API want Risk Based or Safety Case Approach? (Hybrid?)

  9. Detailed Progress Divide and Conquer – cont. 2. Manufacture, Assembly, SIT, Installation, Commissioning • Matrix Developed • Where & How to test being worked • Does Verification and Validation need new KP? (Rewrite KP06?) • MOC being worked

  10. Detailed Progress Divide and Conquer – cont. 3. Operations • Reviewed and Raised issues with existing 12 KPs • Proposed 3 additional KPs • Field Modifications • Inspection and Monitoring • Remedial Intervention • Added 3 Processes to “Project Phase Guide to Processes”

  11. Detailed Progress Divide and Conquer – cont. 4.Technology Qualification • New Risks Identified – commercial obsolescence • Keep integrated as a section in API 17N • Utilize DNV RP A-203 as much as possible • Completed Activities • Received industry feedback on main challenges with Qualifying Technologies • Strawman created for TQ section • Activities in Progress • Drafting started • Defining the proper use of TRLs • Path Forward • Consolidate and review individual sections

  12. Detailed Progress Divide and Conquer – cont. 5. Regulations • Managing Committees 1-4 Interfaces • Will lead Prescriptive vs. Recommend discussions • On hold until more definition / decisions from other committees

  13. Path Forward • Path Forward • Continue Subcommittee work • Outline of Process to use as QA tool • Common Matrix to combine / review completed work • Work the idea of using SURF IM Forum to discuss with industry and gather additional input • Write • Review • Ballot – still aiming for year end 2012

  14. Integration • API 17A, API Q1 • ISO • 14224 - Collection and exchange of reliability and maintenance data for equipment • 20815 - Production assurance and reliability management • 15663 - Life Cycle Costing • TR 12489 - Reliability modeling and calculation of safety systems • Review committee draft document • Feedback 17N specific comments • DNV RP A203/API RP 17Q?

  15. Questions?

More Related