Phase III Trial of Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, and Paclitaxel with Trastuzumab for HER-2+ Breast Cancer
110 likes | 227 Vues
The N9831 trial investigates the efficacy of adjuvant treatment with Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by weekly Paclitaxel, with and without Trastuzumab, for women with HER-2 overexpressing, node-positive breast cancer. Central eligibility criteria for HER-2 testing, including HercepTest and FISH methods, were evaluated to ensure reliable patient selection. The trial aims to optimize treatment strategies and enhance outcomes for this patient population.
Phase III Trial of Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, and Paclitaxel with Trastuzumab for HER-2+ Breast Cancer
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Phase III Trial of Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide (AC) Followed by Weekly Paclitaxel With or Without Trastuzumab as Adjuvant Treatment for Women With HER‑2 Overexpressing Node-Positive Breast Cancer Breast Intergroup (N9831) Edith A. Perez, PI
N9831: Intergroup Trial for Node , HER2 Breast Cancer Paclitaxel qw x 12 AC q3w x 4Paclitaxel qw x 12 H qw x 52 (Paclitaxel + H) qw x 12 H qw x 40 RT/Tam H= trastuzumab n= 3000 PI: Perez EA. NCCTG
Her2 Eligibility Criteria for N9831 as Determined by Local Testing • HercepTest = 3+ • Other IHC test = >33% strongly positive (3+) • Vysis FISH = Her2:Cen17 > 2.0 • Oncor FISH = >5 copies Her2 gene
Her2 Central Testing • Confirmatory central testing of first 100 patients by HercepTest and Vysis FISH • If >20% discrepancy between local and central Her2 status, then modify eligibility based on local results
N9831: HER2 TestingResults • Results of central testing for 119 patients • Local testing methods (65 labs) included: • 50% (59/119) HercepTest • 43% (51/119) other IHC tests • 7% (9/119) FISH
Comparison of Local/Central IHC Review • 74% (81/110) 3+ local IHC and 3+ central HercepTest • 75% (44/59) with 3+ by local HercepTest had 3+ by central HercepTest • 72% (37/51) with 3+ by other IHC had 3+ by central HercepTest
Comparison of Local/Central FISH Review • 77% (7/9) with Her2 amp by local FISH had 3+ by central HercepTest • 67% (6/9) with Her2 amp by local FISH had amplification by central FISH
HercepTest/FISH Central Review of 119 Specimens • 66% (79/119) amp by central FISH • 74% (88/119) 3+ by central IHC • 10% (9/88) were 3+ by central IHC and not amplified by central FISH
HercepTest Comparison of Central HercepTest and Vysis FISH
Summary of Central HercepTest and Vysis FISH Results • 90% (79/88) specimens 3+ on central HercepTest were amplified by central FISH • 100% (31/31) specimens 0,1+, 2+ on central HercepTest were not amplified by central FISH • 92% (110/119) concordance for central IHC and central FISH
Proposed Modifications for N9831 • Register on trial if node-positive and 3+ IHC or Her2 amplified by local testing • Prior to completion of AC, central testing of specimen performed • If 3+ or amplified, randomize to 1 of 3 treatment arms • If not 3+ or amplified, cancel from study