10 likes | 114 Vues
Dive into Krakauer's recounting of risky adventures that mirror McCandless's, and evaluate its influence on his credibility as a writer. Explore the connection between their experiences and the impact on narrative reliability. Does Krakauer's personal involvement enhance or diminish his ethos in detailing McCandless's story? Reference Section 5 or any section for supporting details.
E N D
Analyzing Rhetorical Appeals: Analyzing Ethos (paragraph): Krakauer begins telling his own story about dangerous adventures that parallel McCandless’. How does this affect the objectivity of his writing? Does it make you trust his depiction of McCandless' story more? Or less? You may want to look in Section 5 for your CD, although you may use details from any section in the article. Begin with: Krakauer’s experiences parallel McCandless’ adventures in several ways, which (enhances/detracts from) his (ethos/credibility) as a writer. One similarity between the two men is, “…