html5-img
1 / 37

Learning Object Repository

Learning Object Repository. Suzanne Lapointe GTN-Québec Member Cogigraph and Télé-Université. Key for success. Plan. Vision Context keys for Success Case Studies Université du Québec CREPUQ’s Tool Box Francocommunauté virtuelle. … Learning Object repository…. Vision.

marcos
Télécharger la présentation

Learning Object Repository

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Learning Object Repository Suzanne Lapointe GTN-Québec Member Cogigraph and Télé-Université Key for success

  2. Plan • Vision • Context • keys for Success • Case Studies • Université du Québec • CREPUQ’s Tool Box • Francocommunauté virtuelle

  3. … Learning Object repository…. Vision To increase the quality of teaching by giving access to better quality resources. The idea is to stop doing the version 0,1

  4. Promotion • Access requisite (open, limited, pay-per-use) • Interoperability • Quality Control • Reutilisability Create and preserve resources ! Use and Reuse resources Pedagogical integration of those resources How : 3 steps

  5. … Challenges • At the university Level - professor • Increase the faculty member’s interest to diffuse the LO they produced and to reuse the one already done. • Implement intellectual property functionalities that suits their needs • Explain how to produce LO. • At the university Level – Develop internal expertise to support the faculty members

  6. OR’s paradox • Success rely on A) quantity B) quality C) accessibility of the banks D) integration with platform

  7. How to fill the gap? 1 Association with other banks  federation 2 … 3 ….. 4 …… Conclusion

  8. … GLOBE consortium • Merlot  USA (36,000 resources) • Nime  Japan (250,000 resources) • Edna  Australia (260,000 resources) • ARIADNE  EUROPE (50,000 resources) • CANADA LORNET (4,000 resources)

  9. Federation : Key for quantity

  10. How to fill the gap? 1 Association with other banks  federation 2 Metatagging easy for the users 3 ….. 4 …… Conclusion

  11. Metatagging easy for the users

  12. Behind the Scene : LOM

  13. Federated Search

  14. Federated Search

  15. Passport :

  16. How we diffuse expertise • Workshop in 2005 with library experts, content developers and archivist diffusing the expertise of Normetic • Conference in 2006 with CREPUQ – Faculty members and technopedagogical specialists were invited. • Training for users .

  17. How to fill the gap? 1 Association with other banks  federation 2 Metatagging easy for the users 3 Respect Intellectual Property 4 …… Conclusion

  18. Rights by folders

  19. Specify the rights

  20. How to fill the gap? 1 Association with other banks  federation 2 Metatagging easy for the users 3 Respect Intellectual Property 4 Integration to platform Conclusion

  21. … Context - PROCENA • Platform in each university • A large amount of faculty members doing their own resources • Each resource is done for themselves, few shared their resources.

  22. Integration of PALOMA

  23. Other platforms with LOR

  24. Projet 1 : Projet FODAR : UQ • Who’s involved? • Why ? • Technology developed for the project • Plan : Second Phase

  25. Who’s involved ? • The universities member of the Réseau de l’Université du Québec

  26. Funding • FODAR (UQ funding) • 90,000$ first year • Around 90,000$ second year

  27. … Innovation and learning object repository … technical nature Develop an environment web based easy to use with friendly user interface for referencing the objects; doing research; applying rights to the resources. • Giving access to a system easy to use. • Utilize standards for referencing the objects • Being able to connect one repository to another • Avoid the necessity of expertise by the development of an user friendly interface. • . ……

  28. …Innovation and learning object repository First action : encouraging the faculty members to reference their resources in a bank 1. Which resource? 2. How can we insure quality ? 3. Which options of access limitation? 4. Who will be involved in the institution From the organization point of view: Which strategies to implement to encourage the professors referencingtheir object and encouraging reuse ? … editorial nature Facilitate access of the objects descriptions and encouraging reuse!

  29. Technology used • Already developed with research fundings • System complete and operational but difficult to use for non experts • Core of the technology  federated search

  30. What we learned • Involving library experts is a good way • with library experts (4$ per record) • In successful universities (top down approach combined with bottom up) • Specialized Object repositories are easier

  31. Plan for Second Phase • At least, 1 LOR in each institution • System REA.UQ fully operational • Document the experiences • Expertise in metareferencing in each institution • Editorial policy regarding learning objects diffusion in each institution

  32. Project II : Projet CREPUQ • Why ? • Who’s involved ? • Similar experiences

  33. Tool-Team Mandate • Identify the technopedagogical tools developed and used by the universities (forum, portfolio, wikis…). • Implement a learning object repository with those tools and encourage reuse.

  34. Who participate ? • Quebec universities ; coordinate by the CREPUQ

  35. Similar experiences • Similar previous experience (public services) • Knowledge Exchange Service : 15 years • Adullact : French project : 10 years

  36. New Project : still waiting for funding Partners in Francocommunauté virtuelle project • Moncton University • University of Ottawa • Téluq and Cogigraph Create a portal giving access to the OR from different french universities in Canada

  37. Conclusion : grouping isolate experiencesAt the beginning of the implementationThink about quality

More Related