1 / 11

Retro Evaluation

Retro Evaluation. Mimi Recker Jim Dorward mimi.recker@usu.edu. Evaluation Objectives. Two contexts: IA and TPD Developmental: Usability and utility Impact on teachers’ knowledge, attitude, beliefs (KAB) (Impact on students).

marcus
Télécharger la présentation

Retro Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Retro Evaluation Mimi Recker Jim Dorward mimi.recker@usu.edu

  2. Evaluation Objectives • Two contexts: IA and TPD • Developmental: Usability and utility • Impact on teachers’ knowledge, attitude, beliefs (KAB) • (Impact on students)

  3. The National Science Digital Library (NSDL) is the nation’s free online library for education and research in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics http://nsdl.org/ Instructional Architect is an NSDL service that allows teachers to easily package online resources from a variety of sources for their students. http://ia.usu.edu/

  4. Teacher Professional Development • Improve PD design elements • Evaluate ‘teachers as designers’ • (Impact on students)

  5. Developmental (iterative) Methods • Lit reviews • Needs assessments • Expert reviews • Focus groups • Case studies • Surveys • Logic model

  6. Evaluation Framework A logic model

  7. Example PD Evaluation

  8. Toward Evaluating Impact

  9. Some Lessons • Importance of theory (for research and evaluation) … but they’re not the same thing. • Conducting evaluation in phases (development, implementation, dissemination) • Importance of mixed-methods, but … • Challenges of informing development,triangulating, and finding complementarity across evaluation activities • Importance of allocating funds and people to evaluation early on (mentor and student)

  10. An Evaluation Culture? • Is it critical NSDL component? • Distinguish between internal and external? • Emphasize rigorous designs? • Sharing or reinvention? • Allocate different funds for different phases? • What % of budget goes to evaluation? 5%? 8%? 20%?

  11. URLs • Instructional Architect • ia.usu.edu • Evaluation materials (surveys, logic model, rubrics) • dlconnect.usu.edu • >> Click on ‘Researchers’

More Related