1 / 5

How is each center engaging stakeholders?

How is each center engaging stakeholders?. Responses ranged from little engagement with council / stakeholders to a great deal of formal interaction Almost universally there is not a current formal mechanism for uptake of EM-derived advice into management

mardi
Télécharger la présentation

How is each center engaging stakeholders?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. How is each center engaging stakeholders?

  2. Responses ranged from little engagement with council / stakeholders to a great deal of formal interaction • Almost universally there is not a current formal mechanism for uptake of EM-derived advice into management • IEAs and FEPs appear to provide a future mechanism for more formal engagement

  3. Examples of high levels of engagement • --qualitative predictions of flatfish recruitment from biophysical model • --Ecosystem considerations chapter of the SAFE document presented to council as part of the TAC specification process • SWFSC-- in the Antarctic has a lead role in providing advice based on to CCAMLR • --high levels of interaction with council and other stakeholders regarding forecasts of salmon returns as a function of ocean conditions • --performance testing of ecosystem indicators for use by Puget Sound Partnership

  4. Future Opportunities • Forage fish “set asides” • Management strategy evaluation for IEAs • FEPs • Interstate/intrastate agreements leading to increased EBM and EMs (e.g. Chesapeake, Puget Sound, various governors agreements)

  5. Issues raised • Mismatch in scale or type of information between what EMs deliver and what stakeholders want • Are there standard products needed by all councils • IEAs require providing EM products to non-fisheries stakeholders (e.g. coastal zone managers). Not a lot of discussion about engaging the non-fish world (except forage fish issues)

More Related